On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 11:08:04PM +0200, Paul van Tilburg wrote:
I'd be happy with a 2.1.x release though!
So, what is this numbering after 2.1 about actually? What is the
system?
What are your experiences with AR4 and Camping?
I've made some adjustments (mainly to most queries) in my
Hi,
While I am quite aware that development has pretty much stalled, I
wondered if it would still be possible to have some kind of 2.2 release
out[1]? For me, Camping still works just great with my applications and
also with AR4, so I am still quite happy with it.
I am currently working on the
On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 09:41:00PM +0200, Magnus Holm wrote:
I can easily release a new 2.1.x. Not sure if we need a 2.2 yet?
I am not sure either, especially since the milestone has open issues
but I wonder if they still should all be open.
Are there other 2.2 goals?
I'd be happy with a 2.1.x
Hey,
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 04:55:25PM +0100, Dave Everitt wrote:
just checking if you got a response yet - what's the approximate
deadline date?
I think I have another week, maybe two.
I notice that Camping 2.0 is in Squeeze:
http://packages.debian.org/squeeze/camping
It is, if not for
Hey all,
The new Debian release is freezing soon (about 2 weeks) and I would
really like it to include Camping 2.2 with Mab 0.0.2. Given that
Markaby isn't actually distributable, I have recently uploaded Camping
2.1.498 with a Git snapshot of Mab to test some transitions.
I have adapted
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 10:35:45AM -0700, Trevor Johns wrote:
MIT is marginally simpler to read and is unambiguous, since there's only
one version. For this reason, it's my personal favorite.
Heh. Actually, it is not:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT_license#Various_versions
Or at the vary
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 09:20:18PM +0200, Bartosz Dziewoński wrote:
W dniu 16 kwietnia 2012 20:50 użytkownik Nokan Emiro
uzleep...@gmail.com napisał:
Actually I think it's not logical that you can build HTML by default using
Markaby, but you can't build CSS in the same way.
You never need
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 06:57:51AM -0600, Philippe Monnet wrote:
I think it would be fun too. Love meta stuff.
In general I think the more tutorials / screencasts / posts / sites
on Camping, the merrier.
Although I generally agree, I'd prefer them to be somewhat
organised/structured. For
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 11:01:42PM +0200, Magnus Holm wrote:
Pretty sure this is related to incompatability with the latest Rack
(which suddenly slightly broke the Session-API). It's fixed in
latest master. Maybe we should just do a release soon.
Alright. I will follow with packaging once
Hi!
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 09:19:25AM -0400, David Susco wrote:
On a somewhat related note. How do people handle static content in a
development environment? Is there a way to make the camping server
aware of the public/ directory and serve the files within it?
What about in production? Is
Hello all,
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 05:58:00PM +0100, Jonas Pfenniger wrote:
what do you think of releasing the current trunk as camping-1.6 ?
Nothing much has moved since a while and apart from FastCGI, I believe
most bugs where ironed out.
Yeah, I see in the roadmap that there are two bugs
11 matches
Mail list logo
