Re: Let's get this done, please :-)

2008-10-31 Thread Bluebie, Jenna
Does anyone have any good ideas on how I could hack mongrel_rails to instead bring camping rack app to life via mongrel magic? Do you guys think the best approach is to mod the mongrel_rails code, or to create a rails imposter? On 31/10/2008, at 2:58 AM, Julik Tarkhanov wrote: On Oct 30

Re: Let's get this done, please :-)

2008-10-30 Thread Julik Tarkhanov
On Oct 30, 2008, at 4:01 PM, _why wrote: I don't know, what do most people deploy camping on? My infrastructure is FCGI but except some patches for SCRIPT_NAME and static file delivery I can retrofit it for Rack easily.___ Camping-list mailing lis

Re: Let's get this done, please :-)

2008-10-30 Thread John Beppu
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 8:01 AM, _why <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yes, we need to clear up the rdoc and write howtos for camping with > fastcgi, passenger, and other web servers. I don't know, what do > most people deploy camping on? > I reverse-proxy to mongrel. --beppu

Re: Let's get this done, please :-)

2008-10-30 Thread Josh Schairbaum
I normally use either Thin or Passenger. It's a fairly simple setup for both. I think most shared hosting is going the way of Passenger, Dreamhost, for example. I would say that it might be the most common in the next few months. Just one man's opinion, though. Regards, ch0wda On Thu, Oct 30,

Re: Let's get this done, please :-)

2008-10-30 Thread Bluebie, Jenna
I'm running it on plain old CGI via Apache because my shared hosting environment does not allow for FastCGI. CGI works really well on a modern server... once ruby and all them are cache'd to ram. If my camping app is left disused for about 10 seconds, it gets pushed out of the cache and the

Re: Let's get this done, please :-)

2008-10-30 Thread Aria Stewart
On Oct 30, 2008, at 9:01 AM, _why wrote: On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:09:10PM +0100, Magnus Holm wrote: Documentation is probably what's missing for a release. Both cleaning up some part in the current docs and write some sort of how-to-switch- to-2.0. And the wiki needs some work too! Yes,

Re: Let's get this done, please :-)

2008-10-30 Thread Julik Tarkhanov
On Oct 30, 2008, at 4:01 PM, _why wrote: I don't know, what do most people deploy camping on? Oh yeah to imagine the scale: I have like 6 apps on FCGI now.___ Camping-list mailing list Camping-list@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/

Re: Let's get this done, please :-)

2008-10-30 Thread Fred Phillips
On Thu Oct 30 15:01:50 2008, _why wrote: > I don't know, what do most people deploy camping on? I run it with FastCGI on Apache. Some benchmarks between the different servers would be nice. -- Fred O. Phillips http://fophillips.org BBC7 7572 755F 83E0 3209 504A E4F7 874F 1545 9D41 pgpKbqwnTCF

Re: Let's get this done, please :-)

2008-10-30 Thread Eric Mill
I've deployed a couple Camping apps in a FastCGI environment on shared hosting, and written wiki pages on it. I feel like this must be a pretty common scenario, since shared hosting itself is a common scenario. -- Eric On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 11:01 AM, _why <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, O

Re: Let's get this done, please :-)

2008-10-30 Thread David Gurba
Mongrel ... but then again I think thats so 2005 :/ haha long live camping! On Oct 30, 2008, at 8:01 AM, _why wrote: On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:09:10PM +0100, Magnus Holm wrote: Documentation is probably what's missing for a release. Both cleaning up some part in the current docs and write s

Re: Let's get this done, please :-)

2008-10-30 Thread _why
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:09:10PM +0100, Magnus Holm wrote: > Documentation is probably what's missing for a release. Both cleaning up > some part in the current docs and write some sort of how-to-switch-to-2.0. > And the wiki needs some work too! Yes, we need to clear up the rdoc and write howto