2007/9/27, why the lucky stiff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Well, case-sensitiveness would be a prob with 1.5 as well. Since
@env.HTTP_HOST will work and @env.http_host will not.
True. So what do you think of the attached patch ? It removes roughly
50 octets to camping.rb and seems to work pretty well,
2007/9/26, why the lucky stiff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hey, campineros. And many good handshakes to zimbatm for getting
some patches applied.
You're welcome !
Markaby's going to take much more work. Part of the issue is: how
does an app tell Camping that it needs to use Markaby without
On Sep 26, 2007, at 4:24 AM, Evan Weaver wrote:
As far as I can tell, sym_tbl is just a regular st_table, so it's an
expanding array similar to the Ruby heap.
Oddly enough, this:
c = 0
loop { c += 1; puts two_symbols_sitting_in_a_tree_#{c}.to_sym }
was a total crasher on 1.8.5 but works on
On Sep 26, 2007, at 12:35 AM, Julian 'Julik' Tarkhanov wrote:
class H (HashWithIndifferentAccess rescue Hash)
To be clear, I'm really for the hash also because I use the obj =
@items.delete paradigm to signify
take this item out because we'll work with it). But you can
optionally
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 11:33:42AM +0200, Jonas Pfenniger wrote:
I suggest that H is a child of Hash. Extensions can extend it to
provide method_missing goodness or anything else. The only concern I
have is about case-sensitiveness. I am not sure if the http headers
are normalized on input or
Minimal HWIA removal patch attached. So far, the examples, file
upload, sessions, all work under mongrel with the patch applied.
_why, is it something like that that you want ?
I'm not even sure if HWIA extension is useful. The method_missing
shortcut is even shorter than the one with :symbols.
On Sep 26, 2007, at 12:26 AM, why the lucky stiff wrote:
class H OpenStruct
How about
class H (HashWithIndifferentAccess rescue Hash)
for the lesser among us (who always include and require)?
--
Julian 'Julik' Tarkhanov
please send all personal mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Regular hashes are good. Would need to make a decision whether to
prefer string or symbol keys.
String is easier to support; Symbol looks prettier in your editor.
Evan
On 9/25/07, Julian 'Julik' Tarkhanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 26, 2007, at 12:26 AM, why the lucky stiff wrote:
On Sep 26, 2007, at 2:05 AM, MenTaLguY wrote:
behind the
scenes, every uniquely named method introduces a symbol.
yep. but then it's _you_ who calls that accessor, not some John Doe
who sends you a POST :-)
--
Julian 'Julik' Tarkhanov
please send all personal mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 9/25/07, Julian 'Julik' Tarkhanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this might already be a server crasher. you know how many unique to_syms you
can do before the table is full?
As far as I can tell, sym_tbl is just a regular st_table, so it's an
expanding array similar to the Ruby heap. So there's
10 matches
Mail list logo
