[Capistrano] Re: Editor for Capistrano

2009-01-28 Thread Gerhardus Geldenhuis
Hi Thanks for the replies, I am not yet ready to give up on vi/vim but thought it worth asking. Maybe a bigger problem for me is not the editor but the environment or lack of understanding in how to use it. I got used to pressing F9 or Ctrl+F9 to run/compile code while using Delphi and I really

[Capistrano] Re: Editor for Capistrano

2009-01-28 Thread Gerhardus Geldenhuis
I forgot to mention two other things that I found extremely usefull in Delphi... that I miss in vi an easy way via keyboard shorcut to jump to the function/procedure definition and the ability to dig into the code... if I used a pre-declared function/variable/constant I could jump to the piece of

[Capistrano] Re: Editor for Capistrano

2009-01-28 Thread Jamis Buck
Vim can do that, too. Read the vim help stuff about tags. I don't use it much now, but when I was writing Java code several years ago I used it all the time. - Jamis On 1/28/09 3:39 AM, Gerhardus Geldenhuis wrote: I forgot to mention two other things that I found extremely usefull in

[Capistrano] Re: Editor for Capistrano

2009-01-27 Thread Lee Hambley
Gerardus, Capistrano files are plain Ruby, though in Textmate on the mac you get limited support for intelligently letting you browse at task/namespace level - but this is as much a bug as it is a feature. My advice would be to invest some time in configuring Vim for Ruby, a lot can be done with

[Capistrano] Re: Editor for Capistrano

2009-01-27 Thread Donovan Bray
Netbeans is a capable ruby editor for windows. I primarily use vi and textmate. On Jan 27, 2009, at 5:24 AM, Lee Hambley lee.hamb...@gmail.com wrote: Gerardus, Capistrano files are plain Ruby, though in Textmate on the mac you get limited support for intelligently letting you browse at