Ok, thanks for the advice.
Franco
On 12/09/17 18:28, John Ford wrote:
Hi Franco.
No, it does not work if you ignore these warnings. It sort of works.
Which is worse, IMO...
You should dither your sampling rate until you find something thta
works and design the system to work with that.
Hi Franco.
No, it does not work if you ignore these warnings. It sort of works.
Which is worse, IMO...
You should dither your sampling rate until you find something thta works
and design the system to work with that.
John
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 2:09 PM, Franco
Interesting, thanks for the info. Do you know if it is safe to operate
the ADC outside does assigned constraints, assuming the model meets
timing closure?
Franco
On 12/09/17 17:34, David MacMahon wrote:
Hi, Franco,
I'm not extensively familiar with the inner workings of the AGC5G yellow
Good day!
I had a simular problem at the beginning of the year with a ROACH1 board.
What are the symptoms of your board? What happens when you hit the power
button?
Kind regards
Heystek
On Tue, 12 Sep 2017 at 6:50 PM pei...@xao.ac.cn wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We have a ROACH2
Hi, Franco,
I'm not extensively familiar with the inner workings of the AGC5G yellow block,
but I suspect the limitation is caused by the somewhat obscure constraints
imposed by the MMCM in the Virtex 6. This limitation also affects the ADC16
yellow block. More details can be found here:
Dear Casperites,
Recently I've been testing adc5g block for different compilation
frequency, I figured that the block can be compiled at [540, 960] U
[1080, 2500] MHz, for every other frequency it gives you a "An optimum
PLL solution is not available!" error. This restrictions come from the
Hi All,
We have a ROACH2 board couldn't boot up, does anyone has experience about how
to update the uboot file for ROACH2?
We found some old memo but we are not sure which macros(mac) file is correct.
Best wishes,
Pei Xin
Xinjiang Astronomical Observatory, CAS
pei...@xao.ac.cn
--
You
7 matches
Mail list logo