writeAtMost.
As far as I can see, the rest of the changes are comment deletions and
indentation changes, right?
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 7:27 AM, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote:
it's actually not just indentation, it's brace placement -- from
while (len 0)
{
int n
Avinash,
You mentioned that you have a new order-preserving hash function that
you think will be more generally useful. Can you post it?
thanks,
-Jonathan
But I do think there is nothing wrong with partitioner-per-namespace.
It should be straightfoward to implement (once we have real namespace
support to begin with) and it might be interesting for some apps to
have that ability.
-Jonathan
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Jonathan Ellis jbel
:32 PM, Jeremy Dunck jdu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 6:53 PM, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com
wrote:
...
that's a really huge if, since (a) you'd add a whole new layer of
complexity, and (b) it's not going to magically take any less space
outside than inside.
Ah, hmm. I
they are completely tested
too in a distributed setting. Over here we do not have detailed test code,
but we test by directing a % of the site traffic to a test cluster before we
sign off on anything.
Avinash
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote:
Say for instance
Someone asked on IRC if there is a roadmap for Cassandra. This is a
good discussion to have. :)
Personally my priority list looks like this:
High priority:
1. range queries [which requires the partitioner changes we've been discussing]
2. make cassandra not allow itself to run out of memory
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Avinash Lakshman
avinash.laksh...@gmail.com wrote:
Another issue with ConcurrentHashMap is that the dude is a memory hog. We
got rid of it over a year ago because of the very same reason.
Re CHM: what do you suggest instead? I assume you are talking about
for
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Sandeep Tata sandeep.t...@gmail.com wrote:
I think it is reasonable that a codebase that has evolved for over two
years has significant opportunity for refactoring when it is opened to
a host of new developers. That said, large scale refactoring *at this
stage*
and
impressive. But the refactoring is still necessary because it would bring
the code quality to a higher layer. But we should take it more seriously and
more cautious, should we?
best regards,
hanzhu
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009
+1
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Johan Oskarsson jo...@oskarsson.nu wrote:
Thanks Sandeep.
Would we all be comfortable adopting this process going forward,
hopefully reducing friction, bugs and problems in general?
I assume +1 from me and Sandeep so far.
/Johan
Sandeep Tata wrote:
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 9:53 PM, Prashant Malik pma...@gmail.com wrote:
The results are a bit counter intuitive here I would have expected it to be
faster with the same FP rate but I am not sure why it is slower if you are
just using a couple of hash functions and using double hashing.
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 12:02 AM, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com
wrote:
I went all Enterprise on our jira and assigned issues to version
0.3
that I'd like to get done in the relatively near future for our first
official release.
The list of issues is here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure
In a bunch of places in the code we wrap a CF in a Row object,
basically a key + multiple CFs. But currently only a single
ColumnFamily will ever be in a Row object. (At least in the Rows
involved in a client read op. Maybe Rows are used internally in other
places with multiple CFs. But I am
Another heads up: I applied Johan's patches moving the human-editable
source to src/java and the antlr-generated stuff to src/gen-java.
-Jonathan
I've done my bikeshedding. +1 :)
-Jonathan
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
The current project site (http://incubator.apache.org/cassandra)
redirects to the wiki, which IMO leaves a lot to be desired. With the
upcoming release, there are bound to be a
I committed the patch for CASSANDRA-131 which (a) enables exception
throwing on the insert methods (so you don't have to explicitly check
return value to see if something worked), and (b) moves the _blocking
method as a flag into the nonblocking ones. so instead of
insert_blocking use insert with
I like the Moin look better.
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
I'd like to draw some attention to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-145 which says:
I believe the project would be better served by Apache's moinmoin
wiki. Here's why:
*
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 5:44 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
Having it under http://incubator.apache.org/cassandra/releases/
clearly crosses that line.
Would downloads/ be better?
-Jonathan
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Matthieu Riou matthieu.r...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 3:48 AM, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote:
Do not include any links on the project website that might encourage
non-developers to download and use nightly builds, snapshots, release
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Matthieu Riou matthieu.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Not to mention those who are in another timezone or those who would like to
contribute on their spare time (like a day here and there). If the real
development happens outside the ML, you won't even know those people
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Matthieu Riou matthieu.r...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 7:44 AM, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote:
Do not include any links on the project website that might encourage
non-developers to download and use nightly builds, snapshots, release
.
I don't care either way :)
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Johan Oskarsson jo...@oskarsson.nu wrote:
I guess this time it's my OCD that thinks having a 0.3 and then a 0.3.1
feels wrong, something missing on the first one :)
/Johan
Jonathan Ellis wrote:
There's nothing in 0.3
this marks the ticket as I have a patch available so it shows up
here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truepid=12310865status=10002
let's try to remember to use this since it makes it easier to see what
is ready for review. I know I have been sloppy here in the
, May 14, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote:
this marks the ticket as I have a patch available so it shows up
here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truepid=12310865status=10002
let's try to remember to use this since it makes it easier to see
binary compatibility anyway?
We might be stuck with having to write a tool that migrates from a 0.3
format to a 0.4 format.
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote:
The fix for 208 [1] is fairly invasive. should we
(a) release another RC and do more testing
and rename get_slice_from to get_slice
How does that sound?
-Jonathan
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote:
You are right. Of course, there's no sense in making such a tool
harder to write than it needs to be.
But I don't care that strongly since I won't
- r/m old get_slice and rename get_slice_from to get_slice
How does that sound?
-Jonathan
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote:
You are right. Of course, there's no sense in making such a tool
harder to write than it needs to be.
But I don't care
The consensus was that it's better to release an imperfect-but-stable 0.3 now.
We've resolved all the 0.3 issues in jira, added a BUGS.txt, and
amended our NOTICES to include those of our dependencies.
What's next?
-Jonathan
To keep the bureaucrats happy, can you submit this suggestion to JIRA?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA
thanks,
-Jonathan
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Edward Ribeiroedward.ribe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I've just checked out Cassandra source, and I would like to make a
checking user input is done with explicit if statements; verifying
internal assumptions is done with asserts. Column is not a
user-facing class (that would be column_t).
-Jonathan
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Edward Ribeiroedward.ribe...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear developers,
I saw the
list and let people vote on it?
I guess with the incubator there's extra steps after that, but I assume the
mentors will let us know.
/Johan
Chris Goffinet wrote:
ChangeLog? :)
On Jun 5, 2009, at 1:00 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
The consensus was that it's better to release an imperfect
guess with the incubator there's extra steps after that, but I assume the
mentors will let us know.
/Johan
Chris Goffinet wrote:
ChangeLog? :)
On Jun 5, 2009, at 1:00 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
The consensus was that it's better to release an imperfect-but-stable 0.3
now.
We've resolved
it on the dev list and let people vote on it?
I guess with the incubator there's extra steps after that, but I assume the
mentors will let us know.
/Johan
Chris Goffinet wrote:
ChangeLog? :)
On Jun 5, 2009, at 1:00 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
The consensus was that it's better to release
That's probably what we'll have to do if C# et al don't support
Framed. Which is a shame, because framed makes a lot more sense --
there's really no reason to keep non-framed around. But that's Thrift
for you.
-Jonathan
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 11:44 PM, Ian Holsmani...@holsman.net wrote:
Hey
Since we're proposing things that break stuff this weekend... :)
I think we should rename table to namespace in the config file.
Calling it table confuses people coming from an rdbms background
(i.e. just about everyone).
-Jonathan
namespace might just
be
more confusing.
On Jun 20, 2009, at 6:54 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
Since we're proposing things that break stuff this weekend... :)
I think we should rename table to namespace in the config file.
Calling it table confuses people coming from an rdbms background
(i.e
For those who don't follow -users,
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Matt Revellemreve...@gmail.com wrote:
Cassandra only supports one table per instance (before today?). However, as
Jonathan mentioned previously, what you consider to be tables are
represented as column families in Cassandra.
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Alexander
Staubomadevilgen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Jonathan Ellisjbel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Matt Revellemreve...@gmail.com wrote:
Cassandra only supports one table per instance (before today?).
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Chris Goffinetc...@chrisgoffinet.com wrote:
But the thing is, BigTable uses 'Tables' as well. Calling it namespaces just
makes it even more confusing.
Well, (a) it's only confusing to people who have actually read the
Bigtable paper, and they can cope. :P
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Alexander Stauboa...@purefiction.net wrote:
If that's your point, you could have made it clearer. You will not
achieve that goal by calling it a namespace. I would argue that
users tend to be more familiar with the idea of a table
That's exactly the problem:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Alexander Stauboa...@purefiction.net wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 7:13 PM, Jonathan Ellisjbel...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually, Cassandra doesn't support multidimensional cells a la Bigtable.
I meant multidimensional in the column sense.
If you mean CFs have
the above potential
problem.
What do people feel?
Jun
IBM Almaden Research Center
K55/B1, 650 Harry Road, San Jose, CA 95120-6099
jun...@almaden.ibm.com
Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com
Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com
06/22/2009 08:14 AM
Please respond to
cassandra-dev
Forgot my footnotes. :)
[1] http://spyced.blogspot.com/2009/06/patch-oriented-development-made-sane.html
[2] http://markmail.org/thread/2vtyrx56jwsloxhn
[3] http://code.google.com/p/gerrit/
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Jonathan Ellisjbel...@gmail.com wrote:
Yesterday I posted about my
RC3 is out at
http://people.apache.org/~jbellis/cassandra/cassandra-0.3.0-rc3.tar.gz
svn tag is
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cassandra/tags/cassandra-0.3.0-rc3
changelog is
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cassandra/tags/cassandra-0.3.0-rc3/CHANGES.txt
Planning to
If we were talking about any other project I would say great idea!
But with Thrift, simple patches can take 6+ weeks to be committed. (I
am not exaggerating.)
So I would vote for making it configurable to avoid screwing over
people on those platforms.
-Jonathan
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 3:32 PM,
I'm interested in Avro as kind of a better Thrift, but that's still
pretty alpha.
I'm not really interested in stuff that's going to be Much Slower like
anything over http (Jay from Voldemort said that's basically a waste
of time and I believe him) or anything that requires hand-writing
clients
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Michael Greenemichael.gre...@gmail.com wrote:
A quick time-to-production could be achieved through distributing
re-packaged client libraries. I like that idea. I brought it up on
IRC at one time, and Jonathan convinced me I was wrong, but now I
can't remember
I propose releasing 0.3.0-rc3 as 0.3.0-final.
We've had some unofficial voting on the rc3 thread but this is the
official one. :)
Voting is open for 72h.
binary build is at
http://people.apache.org/~jbellis/cassandra/cassandra-0.3.0-rc3.tar.gz
svn tag is
Wow, that would definitely make us the leader in website awesomeness. :)
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Daniel Lundind...@eintr.org wrote:
I had some spare time, so I worked on a new design for the project site today.
Check it out: http://cassandra-test.unempty.com/
Let me know what you
is .svg source?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-231
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Evan Weaverewea...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you have the vector source for this? I'd like to fuss with it a bit.
If you want I can even give it to one of our designers to work on briefly.
Evan
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 7:49 AM, Bill de hOrab...@dehora.net wrote:
I've been playing around again with Cassandra recently and I agree Thrift is
a pain point, and that was the case when I looked at the project originally.
But I think it's not so much Thrift as how the data is presented to
, at 12:10 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 12:49 -0500, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
I propose releasing 0.3.0-rc3 as 0.3.0-final.
+1
--
Eric Evans
eev...@racklabs.com
--
Ian Holsman
i...@holsman.net
--
Evan Weaver
Voting is over. That's +3 from committers in favor.
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Jonathan Ellisjbel...@gmail.com wrote:
I propose releasing 0.3.0-rc3 as 0.3.0-final.
We've had some unofficial voting on the rc3 thread but this is the
official one. :)
Voting is open for 72h.
binary
With 0.3.0 voted in (the mentors technically have the last word, but
let's assume it does get approved :), we should think about the future
of the 0.3 branch.
Fundamentally 0.3 has issues (see BUGS.txt) and fixing those issues
would turn it into 0.4, so I see the 0.3 maintenance mission as very
could you submit a patch to JIRA?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA
thanks,
-Jonathan
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Anthony Molinaroantho...@pinkbunny.net wrote:
Hi,
I'm in the process of packaging cassandra into some rpms to deploy at
work and noticed that cassandra-cli
We have already committed to breaking disk format for 0.4 (to fix OOM
conditions). To me 0.3 to 0.4 is major (like with postgresql 8.3 to
8.4) but I guess it's just semantics.
-Jonathan
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Anthony Molinaroantho...@pinkbunny.net wrote:
Hi,
I've been lurking on
you just need to specify the right port, and make sure that's not firewalled.
if you look at bin/cassandra.in.sh,
-Xrunjdwp:transport=dt_socket,server=y,address=,suspend=n \
that option tells the jvm to listen for a remote debugger on port .
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 10:53 AM,
Ant's points over on incubator general.
- there must be a source distribution
- the artifact names must include -incubating
- the distributions must be signed
The confusion here is, I thought we were supposed to get release
approval first, _then_ create and sign the official tarballs. (ant
Please give us some credit. It's obvious that you can modify the
contents of the byte[], but we're not trying to protect against
malicious plugins or... something; we're only concerned with thread
safety. For that, the existing code is fine; it's not worth
introducing extra copies to a
Sure, that's reasonable.
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 3:21 AM, Viktor Klangviktor.kl...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you Jonathan, perhaps there would be a market for a soclet pooling
solution?
-- Viktor
On Jul 8, 2009 11:46 PM, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote:
I've always used socket-per
CQL is (a) very incomplete and (b) about to get more so soon (see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-296).
If anyone wants to step up and say this is important enough that I'm
willing to maintain it, then great, let's talk. Otherwise, we're
leaning towards consigning it to svn
So, for 185, I have a half-assed CQL update that at least keeps it
working for ascii data.
Once that's in, for 296 I propose that we proceed with the remove, and
since it will be a clean remove in svn history it will be easy for
Edward or anyone else to revert and work on locally. When progress
Hi guys,
We're trying to get the data format incompatibilities done with before
we put out a 0.4 beta. There's 3 coming up. In order of when they
are likely to be finished:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-341 -- to fix bugs (today)
Re the index bugs: this is referring to column indexes, not key
indexes. (The former are kept in the SSTable; the latter are in a
separate file. Don't delete your -Index.db files. :)
And a correction: 341 is the only one that the compaction process will
fix, not 332 as well.
-Jonathan
On Tue,
I found the bug: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-341
In 0.3 your best bet is to increase ColumnIndexSizeInKB in your
config file to a value large enough that it never creates indexes.
-Jonathan
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Mark McBridemark.mcbr...@gmail.com wrote:
Has
The default OPP now does comparisons based strictly on byte order, and
is no longer collation aware. This is a better default choice for
those who don't need collation since it's much faster. If you do need
collation, the old partitioner is still available as CollatingOPP:
-
Oops! My fault. I'll just run thrift -gen java one more time, just
in case, I thought... :)
Fix checked in.
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Mark Lewandowskim...@digg.com wrote:
I just checked out the latest from trunk, and can't get it to build.
This is what I've gotten so far:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 5:49 AM, ant elderant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 9:44 PM, Jonathan Ellisjbel...@gmail.com wrote:
What do you mean by an unofficial release? A release needs follow
the ASF release procedures and be voted on so needs svn tags, and
distributions to
My brief two cents:
I think terminology + api changes need to be a big improvement to be
worth breaking things at this point, and I don't think this proposal
meets that bar. In fact I'm not sure any proposal could.
On the specifics:
* Keyspace vs Database
Actually the right concept from the
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 7:23 PM, Evan Weaverewea...@gmail.com wrote:
Re. Jonathan on database: oracle/sqlserver/mysql/postgres call it a
database.
No. With a database (ignoring things like user accounts that don't
apply) the difference is that you decide at connection time what
database you
If thrift were sane it would look something like
struct Column {
byte[] name,
optional listColumn subcolumns,
optional int64 timestamp,
optional byte[] value
}
you can either have the subcolumns, or the timestamp and value seems
reasonable to me.
of course in the real world, thrift
I agree with the proposition that the SuperColumn name is weak.
(Although not, as I mentioned, Column or ColumnFamily.) And I could
go with schema over keyspace.
One option to deal with SC would be to excise the term SC (and SCF
from the config) and instead just have Columns, which may or may
see CASSANDRA-195
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:27 AM, Mark Robsonmar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Looking at CASSANDRA-213 I see that there is now a procedure to Bootstrap
a newly added node so it will copy the relevant parts of data from other
nodes in the cluster.
This is a Good Thing.
What I
you're giving garbage as a slice predicate. thrift should error check
that but does not.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-308
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 6:04 AM, Sergio Bossasergio.bo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
the following (client) method call:
client.get_slice(Test1,
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 1:20 AM, ant elderantel...@apache.org wrote:
Ok I wonder if this is just misunderstandings based on naming and
conventions. Could what you're calling here as an unofficial beta
release be the same as what other ASF projects might name a release
candidate? Is the 0.4.0
A row is the data associated with a key in a given CF.
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:17 AM, Arin Sarkissiana...@rspot.net wrote:
Row? What are you guys referring to as a row?
no - this isnt a joke
Arin
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 9:39 PM, Evan Weaverewea...@gmail.com wrote:
PS. How's Avro these
The assumption that within a CF only IColumns of the same type (C or
SC) will be compared is baked in pretty deeply.
-Jonathan
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:23 PM, Evan Weaverewea...@gmail.com wrote:
Incidentally, is there any specific reason the collation has to be
pre-defined at the CF? What if
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Evan Weaverewea...@gmail.com wrote:
What do you see as the benefit of ColumnFamily?
It correctly implies group of columns w/o sounding excessively
generic like ColumnCollection or something, and it means mostly the
same thing as it does in Bigtable, which can be
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Evan Weaverewea...@gmail.com wrote:
I understand the BigTable precedent issue...but it's also a group of
rows, and a group of keys, just as much. Column Family leaves out
the keys
Well, it does, or does not, to the same degree that a Table in a rbd
does or
-6099
jun...@almaden.ibm.com
Jonathan Ellis ---08/14/2009 10:04:11 AM---I thought it best to take a new
vote on making an *official* release of 0.4 beta 1.
From:
Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com
To:
cassandra-dev@incubator.apache.org
Date:
08/14/2009 10:04 AM
Subject:
[re-vote
.
[javac] Note: Recompile with -Xlint:unchecked for details.
[javac] 2 errors
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Jun Raojun...@almaden.ibm.com wrote:
+1.
Jun
IBM Almaden Research Center
K55/B1, 650 Harry Road, San Jose, CA 95120-6099
jun...@almaden.ibm.com
Jonathan Ellis ---08/14
The +1s have it. This vote is closed and we have submitted artifacts
to be reviewed by the incubator PMC (see other thread).
thanks,
-Jonathan
that looks like a log replay bug we had in beta one but is fixed in
current trunk.
On 8/21/09, Anthony Molinaro antho...@alumni.caltech.edu wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to make the transition from 0.3.0 to 0.4.0. I recreated
all my packages, rejiggered my load scripts to load up data, and loaded
, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
no, that should be recent enough.
Was this cl written by the 0.3 install prior to the upgrade?
On 8/21/09, Anthony Molinaro antho...@alumni.caltech.edu wrote:
Maybe not, I'm using trunk (or at least trunk as of yesterday afternoon),
was it fixed today by chance
IMO the window for making this kind of change has passed. We've
talked about finalizing the 0.4 api weeks ago, we got a beta out with
it, and it does the job. The timeline wasn't a surprise to anyone
paying attention to the list. It's time to move on.
-Jonathan
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:36
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Toby DiPasqualecodeslin...@gmail.com wrote:
That feels to me to be a short-sighted point of view. I'd imagine that
its more important for people be able to understand the data model
than meeting some kind of arbitrary timeline. I, too, find the current
naming
-1
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Evan Weaverewea...@gmail.com wrote:
Resolved, that the data model names should be changed in Cassandra 0.5.
Evan
PS. Committers have the most weight, but everyone's voice is heard.
--
Evan Weaver
It goes to -commits (with a reply-to of -dev). Jira generates way
more spam to -commits, so no worries; we're used to it. :)
-Jonathan
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Curt Micolasen...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey Devs,
I am not sure who receives the email mentioned whenever the wiki is
edited,
Yes, definitely +1 thanks for the updates.
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Michael Greenemichael.gre...@gmail.com wrote:
For those thinking, that's some spam I'd like to receive as well! you can
get in on the action at
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-cassandra-commits/
+1 from me.
+1
Hey mentors,
We've had an RC2 vote over on incubator-general and cc'd here for
days. Please vote. This is getting frustrating: we never did finish
the RC1 vote, before it got lapped by RC2.
Remember when I was explaining that the reason I was reluctant to go
through the full release process
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
I am starting to believe it would be helpful if Cassandra adopted a
similar CTR policy for non-code changes on trunk and all branches.
Agreed.
-Jonathan
So it looks like it takes multiple rows, one per column in the rowmutation.
Which is confusing and weird if you ask me.
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, just eyeballing it
ColumnFamilyStore cfStore =
columnFamilyStores_.get
and send
the code across. if there is something which i need to know i will sync
up @ IRC... (hopefully it will starts working for me)...
Regards,
/VJ
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Vijay vijay2...@gmail.com wrote
Hi all,
Rackspace is sponsoring NoSQL East (Oct 29/30 in Atlanta --
https://nosqleast.com/2009/) and we have two extra tickets to give
away to the community. (Tickets for the original venue of 250 seats
sold out, then they found another venue w/ 40 more seats, and it looks
like those will sell
These are spoken for now.
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Rackspace is sponsoring NoSQL East (Oct 29/30 in Atlanta --
https://nosqleast.com/2009/) and we have two extra tickets to give
away to the community. (Tickets for the original venue
+1
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
The 0.4 branch has received a number of important bug fixes[1] since we
released 0.4.0, it feels about time for an 0.4.1.
Shall we? :)
SVN Tag:
+1
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Eric Evans eev...@racklabs.com wrote:
Ok, sorry for the false start, here it is again (as r824462).
The 0.4 branch has received a number of important bug fixes[1] since we
released 0.4.0, it feels about time for an 0.4.1.
Shall we? :)
SVN Tag:
Brandon Williams has been doing some testing on the garbage collector
options we are using, and found that removing the line
-XX:CMSInitiatingOccupancyFraction=1 \
from bin/cassandra.in.sh dramatically increases throughput by reducing
the amount of CPU used by the garbage collector.
1 - 100 of 183 matches
Mail list logo
