No real example. Just some unit tests to test with
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Gabriel Mancini de Campos
gabriel.manc...@gmail.com wrote:
Craig do you have this example ?
WCF+WINDSOR+RESTFULL ???
On 3 fev, 12:20, Craig Neuwirt cneuw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 4:13
if u can, please up this sample...
i realy need start in this subject.
thanks
On 20 mar, 12:31, Craig Neuwirt cneuw...@gmail.com wrote:
No real example. Just some unit tests to test with
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Gabriel Mancini de Campos
gabriel.manc...@gmail.com wrote:
Craig
I believe there are some good examples of using WCF Rest out there. All the
WCF Facility will do is help simplify the configuration of those clients and
services. Is that the area you need help in?
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Gabriel Mancini de Campos
gabriel.manc...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll see if I can add a rest example to the demo in the WCF Facility project
over the weekend.
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Gabriel Mancini de Campos
gabriel.manc...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes,
So i get the code from MIKE HADLOW in
that´s cool,
i can't find nothing like this on web,
i google this, but no success, nothing to reunion WCF+WINDSOR+REST
so thanks, if i build this, i will put here ok?
thanks
On 20 mar, 16:20, Craig Neuwirt cneuw...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll see if I can add a rest example to the demo in the WCF
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Colin Jack colin.j...@gmail.com wrote:
Couple of issues I've observed.
The first was that I had my service class had constructor dependencies
that I'd not registered, this was obviously silly of me but when
debugging all I kept getting was 502s when trying
Couple of issues I've observed.
The first was that I had my service class had constructor dependencies
that I'd not registered, this was obviously silly of me but when
debugging all I kept getting was 502s when trying to contact my REST
resources (programatically or using Fiddler) and it took me
Excellent, thats relaly cool news.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Castle Project Users group.
To post to this group, send email to castle-project-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this
I'm very impressed with the WCF integration facility, great work.
On Jan 17, 7:39 pm, Craig Neuwirt cneuw...@gmail.com wrote:
I am preparing to release the WCF Integration Facility in the next few weeks
and wanted to gather any feedback, requests, wishes that users may have.
thanks,
craig
thanks
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 7:52 AM, Colin Jack colin.j...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm very impressed with the WCF integration facility, great work.
On Jan 17, 7:39 pm, Craig Neuwirt cneuw...@gmail.com wrote:
I am preparing to release the WCF Integration Facility in the next few
weeks
and
One question, I just had a wierd error relating to the WCF Facility. I
found one reference to it from a year ago but I put it down to having
multiple versions of Castle arond so I've just spent the afternoon
getting/building Castle/Rhino/NHibernate/Fluent NHibernate/MVC
Contrib. So my question
Yes Castle is actively in the process of releasing. Individual projects
have different owners and release plans, but they should all be coming soon.
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Colin Jack colin.j...@gmail.com wrote:
One question, I just had a wierd error relating to the WCF Facility. I
Thanks for your feedback. I'll see what I can come up with.
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 2:47 PM, jsimons johnsimons...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
Hi Craig,
There is one thing that I miss. the ability on the client side to pass
parameters to the Resolve method of the container, so that I can do:
Eg.
-- i agree with jsimons, I also needed it for my project.
It should be also interesting if the Binding could be dynamically
resolved. So ABC is covered.
ICore proxy = container.ResolveICore(new { Endpoint =
WcfEndpoint.BoundTo(_binding).At(http://test.com/blah;) });
-- Default binding for
Craig,
I did the original docs...can I help with the new ones? I haven't
looked at the facility for a bit, so it'd be good for me to see how
it's grown.
The doc format for Castle has changed as well now, yes?
On Jan 17, 3:12 pm, Craig Neuwirt cneuw...@gmail.com wrote:
They are very very out
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Ruprict glenn.goodr...@gmail.com wrote:
Craig,
I did the original docs...can I help with the new ones? I haven't
looked at the facility for a bit, so it'd be good for me to see how
it's grown.
That would much appreciated. The unit tests should cover all
The doc format for Castle has changed as well now, yes?
Hmm. I am not sure. What makes you think it changed?
We were looking at docbook a while back, but there has been no progress on
that front. We are still using Anakia, which currently provides us most
things we need.
Cool, that's what I thought. Thanks for confirmation.
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Jonathon Rossi j...@jonorossi.com wrote:
The doc format for Castle has changed as well now, yes?
Hmm. I am not sure. What makes you think it changed?
We were looking at docbook a while back, but
Hi Craig,
I'm using your facility in my current project, and it works great on
the server side(excellent work) but my client side needs to be able to
change the endpoint dynamically based on certain conditions, so my
feature request would be to allow the WcfFacility on the client side
support
I am preparing to release the WCF Integration Facility in the next few weeks
and wanted to gather any feedback, requests, wishes that users may have.
thanks,
craig
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Are the docs here
http://www.castleproject.org/container/facilities/trunk/wcf/index.html
complete and actual?
-Markus
2009/1/17 Craig Neuwirt cneuw...@gmail.com:
I am preparing to release the WCF Integration Facility in the next few weeks
and wanted to gather any feedback, requests, wishes
21 matches
Mail list logo
