lern2putty :D
There's an option to turn on X11 forwarding, and it works :)
Marcello Romani wrote:
A. Pagaltzis ha scritto:
* Marcello Romani [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-01-15 14:15]:
I usually do Cygwin/X, xhost +, then ssh into linux box, export
DISPLAY and type startkde.
You know that you
Perrin Harkins wrote:
On Mon, 2007-01-15 at 11:35 +0100, Robert 'phaylon' Sedlacek wrote:
To summarize (again): The benchmark doesn't benchmark Catalyst, only
it's dispatcher
I think it's a lame benchmark too, but isn't a dispatcher mostly what
Catalyst is? DBIx::Class and TT are not
Like what? And what about those other design options is
benchmarkable?
1. the language. For instance, a key factor against RoR for me was the
fact that Ruby doesn't know where its going w.r.t. unicode. Perl has
mature support for that. There are multiple other reasons why people
like/dislike
so a set of benchmarks would give you the chance to show that
TIMTOWTDI, and the trade offs that exist between them. That would be
pretty interesting to someone trying to compare frameworks.
That's where having simple tests that exercise one aspect of the
framework in isolation, as far as is
On Thursday 11 January 2007 18:24, Matt S Trout wrote:
On 9 Jan 2007, at 17:10, Xavier Robin wrote:
I also tried HTML::Scrubber as proposed by Carl Franks, but
basically it keeps
some tags we chose to allow.
Have a look at the scrubber docs, there are options to select exactly
which tags
Daniel McBrearty wrote:
so a set of benchmarks would give you the chance to show that
TIMTOWTDI, and the trade offs that exist between them. That would be
pretty interesting to someone trying to compare frameworks.
I doubt that this is a simple list of features, but you are free to
prove me
Le 16 janv. 07 à 11:27, Daniel McBrearty a écrit :
Fair enough. So why not try to design a benchmark in such a way that
those techniques can be exploited? What is the simplest set of tests
that has some meaning for you?
I don't know :) I'm thinking benchmarking simple things don't work.
On 13 Jan 2007, at 13:57, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
Hi,
If I do:
perl TranzactiiBursiere.pm
it gives the error below.
However, if I access the application in the browser, it works fine.
Couldn't instantiate component TranzactiiBursiere::Model::Db,
Can't locate object method
On 14 Jan 2007, at 15:26, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
Hi,
Here is ablog I just found. Is it true that Catalyst is so slow
comparing with other frameworks?
http://letsgetdugg.com/category/rails
Is it true that for incredibly trivial applications Catalyst might
serve less rps? Yes.
Have I
On 12 Jan 2007, at 18:59, Jonas Alves wrote:
On 12/01/07, Jonas Alves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying Reaction for the first time. I already got it to work
using
the CRUDController against some tables i have in a database.
Now i'm trying to change the widgets used to display the
On 15 Jan 2007, at 18:56, Jonas Alves wrote:
On 15/01/07, Jonas Alves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On
14/01/07, Ash Berlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jonas Alves wrote:
Hi all,
I was starting to put authentication in a Reaction application
that i'm
developing when I saw that Reaction has
Robert 'phaylon' Sedlacek wrote:
Perrin Harkins wrote:
I think it's a lame benchmark too, but isn't a dispatcher mostly what
Catalyst is? DBIx::Class and TT are not Catalyst, as people often
mention on the list.
I wouldn't say so. You can build applications that only use the
dispatcher of
I looked for that discussion - didn't find it. Do you have a pointer?
In your experience, what is accounting for the other 99.9% fo runtime?
Db access? templates? other?
On 1/16/07, Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 14 Jan 2007, at 15:26, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
Hi,
Here is ablog I
forget that ... found it
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/users/10756?search_string=data%20retrieval;#10756
On 1/16/07, Daniel McBrearty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I looked for that discussion - didn't find it. Do you have a pointer?
In your experience, what is accounting for
Perrin Harkins wrote:
In the context of benchmarks, those things all seem pretty minimal to
me. The model interface is a razor-thin wrapper over calls to your ORM
of choice. There's not much reason to use it that I can see. Same with
the view: very little difference from calling templating
Hi,
I want to create a standalone binary executable for Windows and another one
for Linux using ActiveState perlapp.
Is it possible to make it independent, and distribute only the executable
without the modules from the lib directory of the application?
I have tried creating an executable
From: Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Couldn't instantiate component TranzactiiBursiere::Model::Db,
Can't locate object method compose_namespace via package Db
Don't call your database class 'Db'.
DB is the namespace reserved for the perl debugger.
Windows is case insensitive.
Guess what's
On 16/01/07, Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 15 Jan 2007, at 18:56, Jonas Alves wrote:
On 15/01/07, Jonas Alves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On
14/01/07, Ash Berlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jonas Alves wrote:
Hi all,
I was starting to put authentication in a Reaction application
Can it be done, I keep getting weird results. I want to do
my ($val1,$val2) = $c-forward('test');
sub test : Private {
___
List: Catalyst@lists.rawmode.org
Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive:
From: Chisel Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 05:12:05PM +0200, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
Is it possible to do what I want, using perlapp? If not, is it possible
with PAR?
Is this any help?
http://www.catalystframework.org/calendar/2005/6
I have tried to do that, but it
nmake catalyst_par
...
Writing PAR tranzactiibursiere.par
NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'D:\WINDOWS\system32\cmd.exe' : return code
'0x2'
Stop.
What versions of:
App::Packer
PAR::Packer
PAR
do you have?
But anyway, does this method hide the source code of the application?
Try these:
Octavian Rasnita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 01/16/2007 12:08:13 PM:
From: Chisel Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 05:12:05PM +0200, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
Is it possible to do what I want, using perlapp? If not, is it
possible
with PAR?
Is this any help?
Jonathan Rockway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 01/16/2007 12:22:24 PM:
nmake catalyst_par
...
Writing PAR tranzactiibursiere.par
NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'D:\WINDOWS\system32\cmd.exe' : return code
'0x2'
Stop.
What versions of:
App::Packer
PAR::Packer
PAR
do you have?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I prefer you send me the one packaged with par:crypto -- I like to be able
to read comments and see the original var names when I edit your hidden
code. =)
DMCA violation.
--
package JAPH;use Catalyst qw/-Debug/;($;=JAPH)-config(name = do {
$,.=reverse qw[Jonathan
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No. There is really no way to distribute a perl application in a way to
hide its source. Any attempt you make will be met with false security and
failure. Maybe Perl 6, but that is still unanswered at this point.
Have you found a way of cracking the protection of
Jonathan Rockway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 01/16/2007 12:57:39 PM:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I prefer you send me the one packaged with par:crypto -- I like to be
able
to read comments and see the original var names when I edit your hidden
code. =)
DMCA violation.
=)
But I need
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Take a look at /tmp/pdk/ perlapp exes dump the plaintext while running.
This is not a problem with Catalyst, perl is an interpreted language
not
a compiled one. perlapp is there to make distributing self contained perl
applications easier, not to protect your source.
On 16/01/07, Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 16 Jan 2007, at 00:45, Jim Spath wrote:
Hi,
I am using Catalyst + DBIx::Class for the first time and was
running through the tutorial located here:
http://search.cpan.org/~jrockway/Catalyst-Manual-5.700501/lib/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Installing Catalyst on a Fedora/RedHat system can be a challenge - especially
if you insist on keeping all installed software manageable via RPM. This is
because many of the packages required to run Catalyst are not available from
any common
If a language is interpreted, this doesn't mean that the programs that were
made with it cannot be protected in any way.
It will be fairly easy to crack installed Perl software.
Or, is there another way of protecting the code from a Catalyst app?
Offer an Application Service Provider model. I.e.
Octavian Rasnita wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Take a look at /tmp/pdk/ perlapp exes dump the plaintext while running.
This is not a problem with Catalyst, perl is an interpreted
language not
a compiled one. perlapp is there to make distributing self contained
perl
applications easier,
Hi,
I've been thinking a lot about all the different ways
Catalyst let's you do stuff and wondering what, if
any, thoughts any of you might have regarding some of
the overlapping features of Controllers and
ActionClasses, particularly when thinking about
creating good reusable code.
Before we
From: Peter Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If a language is interpreted, this doesn't mean that the programs that
were
made with it cannot be protected in any way.
It will be fairly easy to crack installed Perl software.
Can you tell me how to find the source code from a perlapp program?
From: Joe Landman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
perlapp doesn't drop the source code in /tmp. It puts there only some
.dll files, and nothing more than that.
(I am using perl Dev Kit 6.02, but now PDK 7 was just released).
The source needs to be obtained somehow and in some state for the Perl
program
Octavian Rasnita wrote:
From: Joe Landman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
perlapp doesn't drop the source code in /tmp. It puts there only some
.dll files, and nothing more than that.
(I am using perl Dev Kit 6.02, but now PDK 7 was just released).
The source needs to be obtained somehow and in some
35 matches
Mail list logo
