before outgrowing it and moving on to several
dedicated servers. Their support cannot be beat and the prices are
very reasonable.
Best,
Brian Kirkbride
___
List: Catalyst@lists.rawmode.org
Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Jason Kohles wrote:
On Jun 26, 2007, at 12:45 PM, Brian Kirkbride wrote:
Jason Kohles wrote:
On Jun 25, 2007, at 1:27 PM, Evaldas Imbrasas wrote:
Yes, that's what I meant, thanks Brian. Please provide a code example
using RenderView action. I think it would also make sense to
incorporate
be the exact path
Catalyst uses or would there be a X-Forwarded-Base header or somesuch?
Best,
Brian Kirkbride
___
List: Catalyst@lists.rawmode.org
Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail
Brian Kirkbride wrote:
Hello all,
I've got an Catalyst webapp that has several areas:
/admin/...
/manage/...
/client/...
All of these are accessible from one site:
mysite.com/admin
mysite.com/manage
mysite.com/client
Now, here's the tricky part. I'd really like to have a proxy or
URL
base controller being released on CPAN?
Best,
Brian Kirkbride
___
List: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
Dev site: http
Perrin Harkins wrote:
On 4/12/07, Brian Kirkbride [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now I'd like to avoid tying up the heavy procs for slow uploads. Many
suggest
to run upload handlers as CGI rather than mod_perl because the 1s
startup time
is negligent compared to the time required to upload. I have
A. Pagaltzis wrote:
Hi Brian,
* Brian Kirkbride [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-04-12 19:25]:
I have a CMS-like application using Catalyst for which about
40-50% of requests contain large file uploads. I'm using a
pretty standard two-tiered setup to avoid tying up heavy
mod_perl procs for slow client
Luis Azevedo wrote:
Hi All,
In Root.pm, auto action I am trying to break the execution of chain of
Actions.
To be more exact, whenever I detect I loose connection to a socket or cookie
session, I want to redirect the user to a login action, not rendering the
action the user is calling.
I
Jason Gottshall wrote:
Brian Kirkbride wrote:
I definitely have Models, but they are a higher-level abstraction than
the ORM
layer. If I understand your argument, you are advocating that data
constraints
imposed by your business logic be enforced by the the DB rather than
the ORM.
That's
Jason Gottshall wrote:
Catalysters:
I'm developing a new app using Catalyst, with DBIC as the db persistence
layer. I intend to build Models that encapsulate the business logic and
that will use DBIC to interact with the database as necessary, instead
of using DBIC as a model itself.
So if I'm
make sense if the Chained attribute is '/'
I've attached a patch implementing this change, comments or criticisms much
appreciated.
Best,
Brian Kirkbride
--- /tmp/Chained.pm 2007-03-22 13:27:35.452477260 -0500
+++ /opt/catalyst/lib/Catalyst/DispatchType/Chained.pm 2007-03-22 13:41
Brian Cassidy wrote:
Perhaps you're looking for PathPrefix (coming to a new Catalyst near you
... eventually -- it's in svn now.). For now, do this:
sub _parse_PathPrefix_attr {
my ( $self, $c, $name, $value ) = @_;
return PathPart = $self-path_prefix;
}
sub get_id : Chained('/')
Alejandro Imass wrote:
Hello,
I wrote a complete backend in HTML::Widget a couple of months ago, and
now I'm adding new functionallity to another part of the site. The
question is:
a - Stick with HTML::Widget and wait for FormFu ?
b - use C::C::FormBuilder ?
I am inclined for option b, but
Thomas Klausner wrote:
Hi!
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 04:47:15PM -0400, Christopher H. Laco wrote:
Or more to the point... have app supplied templates, and be able to user
user customized templates in combination with the app
templates...without have to worry about sources, merging, upgrade,
Christopher H. Laco wrote:
THe only part of that that feels dirty is that it's still an either-or
situation, rather than an base_mine situation. That could be solved by
TT plugins, but that's nasty at some level.
True, but if you get the granularity right this is not a problem. Think of
Michael Reece wrote:
i don't think it's a bug.
snip
have you tried adding :Args(0) to the action?
That was my guess too, I've been bit by this problem before adding Args(0) to my
actions.
- Brian
___
List: Catalyst@lists.rawmode.org
Jeffrey Ng wrote:
I am the coworker of Fayland who posted the topic memory usage of
mod_perl process.
Our company has invested quite some time on migrating our perl code to
catalyst (more than half year of time by 7 programmers). However, I am
starting to worry that moving to catalyst is
Matt S Trout wrote:
On 3 Jan 2007, at 20:21, Brian Kirkbride wrote:
Hello all,
Is there a best practice way to maintain a map of URLs used in a
Catalyst application. To clarify, I need to map actions to URLs
outside of Catalyst (CRON jobs, Emailers, etc) and won't have access
to $c
Fernan Aguero wrote:
[ or perhaps 'is it possible to clone a resultset?' ]
Hi!
I'm building a form whose elements are items taken from the
db. And I need these items to show up in different elements
(fieldsets) of the form. More or less something like this:
With items similar to:
'checkbox'
Hello all,
Is there a best practice way to maintain a map of URLs used in a Catalyst
application. To clarify, I need to map actions to URLs outside of Catalyst
(CRON jobs, Emailers, etc) and won't have access to $c-uri_for or the
$c-dispatcher.
Right now I have a hashref of action_name =
could be reset to the default in the forked child
process to avoid this problem, but didn't have the time to fix it. I only use
system() in 1 or 2 places and the local fix was acceptable for me.
Best,
Brian Kirkbride
___
List: Catalyst@lists.rawmode.org
case that would benefit from the end-time auto feature
that has been discussed before. Since we have begin/end, I would favor an
auto/post_auto as well. Any better name suggestions? :)
Best,
Brian Kirkbride
___
List: Catalyst@lists.rawmode.org
. At
least I know that I can do that later with a simple log4perl.conf config file
change.
Best,
Brian Kirkbride
___
List: Catalyst@lists.rawmode.org
Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail
Jonathan Rockway wrote:
Good find. The whole complicated [% BLOCK %] business that I was
complaining about was actually the problem. I admit to never having
used [% BLOCK %], so that's why I didn't run into the problem.
Regards,
Jonathan Rockway
Ah, that makes sense.
What do you
Mark Blythe wrote:
If the controller truly never sees DBIC stuff, does that mean that
your model logic never returns DBIC objects? For instance, let's say
you have a logic method called findBestFit() that's supposed to return
shoes that fit a given person and activity the best. Would it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 08/18/2006 12:33 PM:
Ek, not at all. The model should encapsulate *all* business logic
and
similar - it should be a model of the domain with which the app
interacts. The
Controller should be as thin a layer as possible
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brian Kirkbride [EMAIL PROTECTED] @ 08/18/2006 01:57 PM:
At this point, if I want code reuse I have two reasonable choices:
A) Create business logic modules, ie. MyApp::Logic::CreateTrial, etc
B) Write my own business logic methods in
MyApp::Schema::Trial
Simon Wilcox wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Christopher H. Laco wrote:
Make it really really easy to get started for people who don't know much
perl.
Here we get into a tricky debate about ease-of-use vs flexibility and
performance. While not mutually exclusive, it is very difficult and
28 matches
Mail list logo
