Is this feature planned for the next release ?
___
List: Catalyst@lists.rawmode.org
Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.rawmode.org/
Dev site:
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 06:05:20PM +0400, Oleg Pronin wrote:
Is this feature planned for the next release ?
I'm not sure the 'feature' is really well-defined enough yet to call it
such.
It's going to take somebody with a requirement for something along these
lines to spike the work and see what
Please tell me how could i implement that without making the interface a
complete app ?
2007/5/8, Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 06:58:16PM +0400, Oleg Pronin wrote:
I can test the part related to the subject of this thread with great
pleasure.
I'm currently making
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 06:46:59PM +0400, Oleg Pronin wrote:
2007/5/8, Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 06:58:16PM +0400, Oleg Pronin wrote:
I can test the part related to the subject of this thread with great
pleasure.
I'm currently making full-featured dynamic
This interface is accessible under /folder/. It has its own templates,
static content, DBIC sources and controllers.
What excatly do i need to specify?
So please share your ideas :)
2007/5/8, Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 06:58:16PM +0400, Oleg Pronin wrote:
I can
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 12:20:33PM +0400, Oleg Pronin wrote:
This interface is accessible under /folder/. It has its own templates,
static content, DBIC sources and controllers.
What excatly do i need to specify?
Whether it shares views/models/etc. with the main app, like I asked in my
first
I think it would be better if it does not.
Because AppA don't know and don't want to know the templates and models of
AppB. They communicate through controllers only.
2007/5/8, Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 12:20:33PM +0400, Oleg Pronin wrote:
This interface is
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 06:13:29PM +0400, Oleg Pronin wrote:
I think it would be better if it does not.
Because AppA don't know and don't want to know the templates and models of
AppB. They communicate through controllers only.
How about, after setup_components, injcting AppB's -controllers
A good point to start with.
As a more complex solution later maybe one should try to store a hash of
applications ($c) with all surrounding stuff. And make independent component
which will decide which application (i.e. $c) the request is to be
dispatched to.
Ahh, unfortunately im not familiar
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 08:02:04PM +0400, Oleg Pronin wrote:
You didn't understand what i meant. MyApp::A is not a class. It's a whole
application with all surrounding stuff.
so and MyApp::B.
Ok lets build the question in another manner:
Catalyst scans for all modules under
I can test the part related to the subject of this thread with great
pleasure.
I'm currently making full-featured dynamic admin interface for catalyst (not
so simple as plugin CRUD :) )
And it will have been loaded as plugin into a project (while this interface
is catalyst project itself).
Yes, your right. I just wanted to start with something simple :)
In two worlds, i want the same effect (visual) like this (in apache config):
Location /
PerlHandler Application_A
/Location
Location /folder
PerlHandler Application_B
/Location
But in this way the program code A
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 06:58:16PM +0400, Oleg Pronin wrote:
I can test the part related to the subject of this thread with great
pleasure.
I'm currently making full-featured dynamic admin interface for catalyst (not
so simple as plugin CRUD :) )
And it will have been loaded as plugin into
On Wednesday 02 May 2007 05:30, Oleg Pronin wrote:
Greetings!
I want to make MyApp::B a part of MyApp::A under namespace for example
/folder/
Pretty sure that you can't do this now, although it is a feature planned for
the next release. The app/context split branch in svn might have the
Greetings!
I want to make MyApp::B a part of MyApp::A under namespace for example
/folder/
Both B and A are normal catalyst applications. (both do
'__PACKAGE__-setup()' and etc. and therefore cannot work together).
How to do this with minimal changes to application A (for example, using B
as
Oleg Pronin scribbled on 5/2/07 5:30 AM:
Greetings!
I want to make MyApp::B a part of MyApp::A under namespace for example
/folder/
Both B and A are normal catalyst applications. (both do
'__PACKAGE__-setup()' and etc. and therefore cannot work together).
How to do this with minimal changes
Peter Karman wrote:
Oleg Pronin scribbled on 5/2/07 5:30 AM:
Greetings!
I want to make MyApp::B a part of MyApp::A under namespace for example
/folder/
Both B and A are normal catalyst applications. (both do
'__PACKAGE__-setup()' and etc. and therefore cannot work together).
How to
Oleg Pronin wrote:
You didn't understand what i meant. MyApp::A is not a class. It's a whole
application with all surrounding stuff.
so and MyApp::B.
Ok lets build the question in another manner:
Catalyst scans for all modules under MyApp::Controller to build the list of
url actions.
18 matches
Mail list logo