'Cause I'm outta the loop. That looks quite nice. The doc is a bit terse
(though that might really be all there is to it). Can you clear just a
part of the cache? It's okay if not but I'd like to be able to clear
one document or result_set out when it's updated without messing with
others that hav
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 12:08:29PM -0800, Ashley Pond V wrote:
> I'm having trouble getting Plugin::Cache to handle DBIC objects
> correctly. Past instruction, and recent refresher, from MST shows
> that you have to reset/revive the result source and this works for a
> single object but blows
I'm having trouble getting Plugin::Cache to handle DBIC objects
correctly. Past instruction, and recent refresher, from MST shows
that you have to reset/revive the result source and this works for a
single object but blows up for prefetch.
In this code
my $article = $c->cache->get(
Matt S Trout wrote:
That's because I was bitching about later Ubuntus, not Dead Rat.
Dead Rat == CentOS 5?
I simply don't consider RH distros a deployment platform you'd choose unless
mandated to use them, and prefer to build my own perl if I have to.
CentOS 5's vendor perl will show a 2
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 11:43:33AM +1030, Jon Schutz wrote:
> Personally I would not consider Ubuntu suitable as a production server
> platform as it is too close to the bleading edge.
Because 6.06 is the long-term supported release it's been rather more
conservative.
As I've already said, I don'
When will the Catalyst book be published?
I don't see it on the Packt publishing list
Gerda Shank
___
List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 11:16:54AM +, Richard Jones wrote:
> > Peter Edwards wrote:
> > >Centos 5 == Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.
> > >For production quality, you can expect it to be pretty stable and I
have
> > >corporate customers running it successfully. It's one of our
development
> > >pla
