Personally? ::Engine::HTTP::Prefork + ::Plugin::Static::Simple.
Then I put a reverse proxy in front (it doesn’t really matter,
I’ve used Apache mod_proxy and Varnish, pick whatever you like),
and teach that to cache the static files for a very, very long
time.
Do you have any performance data
* Kaare Rasmussen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-09-30 08:20]:
Personally? ::Engine::HTTP::Prefork +
::Plugin::Static::Simple. Then I put a reverse proxy in front
(it doesn’t really matter, I’ve used Apache mod_proxy and
Varnish, pick whatever you like), and teach that to cache the
static files for
I thought about this (that passing the string in the path rather than as a
parameter would make a difference). I've tried using a RewriteRule to turn
the path into a query parameter but I get the same behavior. I feel like
the issue is with how perl is passing the string around inside my code
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 09:46:42AM -0400, John Lee wrote:
Matt S Trout wrote:
fcgid is designed for shared hosting. it's basically useless for dedicated
setups.
I ask this, because it seems that it works better than fastcgi, it is
maintained and prefered, but I can't see why.
Shadowcat are looking to start offering training in Catalyst, DBIx::Class
and Moose usage, both introductory sessions and more advanced workshop-style
classes. The intended format would be two-day classes on site in Lancaster
(we'll either arrange accommodation or people can organise their own if
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 6:51 AM, Hugh Hunter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
I've been struggling with this for some time and know there must be an
answer out there.
I'm using URL arguments to pass parameters to my controller. It's a site
about names, so take the url
There's an interesting paper on CSRF mentioned on slashdot today:
http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/sites/default/files/csrf.pdf
It mentions Catalyst along with some other frameworks and suggests a way
to build in CSRF-protection.
Cheers, Dave
___
Dave Howorth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/30/2008 10:23:10 AM:
There's an interesting paper on CSRF mentioned on slashdot today:
http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/sites/default/files/csrf.pdf
It mentions Catalyst along with some other frameworks and suggests a way
to build in
On Sep 30, 2008, at 10:08 AM, Moritz Onken wrote:
attackers can use POST
This is possible due to the fact that flash movies can send any
request to a server.
You can achieve this even with a XMLHTTPRequest.
If scripting is involved that makes it a XSS attack instead, though. No?
-Ashley
Am 30.09.2008 um 19:20 schrieb Ashley:
On Sep 30, 2008, at 10:08 AM, Moritz Onken wrote:
attackers can use POST
This is possible due to the fact that flash movies can send any
request to a server.
You can achieve this even with a XMLHTTPRequest.
If scripting is involved that makes it a
Hi,
is it possible to use ldap to authenticate and dbic (a database) to handle the
user role relation ? So that it works like it resides all in one storage
backend.
If yes how do I configure that in the $application.conf ?
Stephan
___
List:
Not directly... it's not even possible in DBIC to have relationships
between different databases, which is essentially what you're talking
about doing.
You can accomplish the same thing client-side if you write your own user
store module(s), which is not fundamentally difficult. I have done
Moritz Onken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/30/2008 01:08:38 PM:
Am 30.09.2008 um 19:20 schrieb Ashley:
On Sep 30, 2008, at 10:08 AM, Moritz Onken wrote:
attackers can use POST
This is possible due to the fact that flash movies can send any
request to a server.
You can achieve this
Am 30.09.2008 um 21:15 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Moritz Onken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/30/2008 01:08:38 PM:
Am 30.09.2008 um 19:20 schrieb Ashley:
On Sep 30, 2008, at 10:08 AM, Moritz Onken wrote:
attackers can use POST
This is possible due to the fact that flash movies can send
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 08:10:13AM -0700, J. Shirley wrote:
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 6:51 AM, Hugh Hunter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
I've been struggling with this for some time and know there must be an
answer out there.
I'm using URL arguments to pass parameters to my
Hi,
I'm trying to use the UploadProgress plugin.
At the moment it doesn't update the progressbar during the upload, but the
first time it does is when I cancel the upload or it has finished. I think
the problem is that I'm using Mason instead of TT . Could that be the problem
and if yes is
On Sep 30, 2008, at 6:27 PM, Stephan Jennewein wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to use the UploadProgress plugin.
At the moment it doesn't update the progressbar during the upload,
but the
first time it does is when I cancel the upload or it has finished. I
think
the problem is that I'm using Mason
On Wednesday 01 October 2008 12:39:08 am Andy Grundman wrote:
On Sep 30, 2008, at 6:27 PM, Stephan Jennewein wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to use the UploadProgress plugin.
At the moment it doesn't update the progressbar during the upload,
but the
first time it does is when I cancel the
* On Sat, Sep 27 2008, Darren Duncan wrote:
Maybe you're already aware of this, but I've found from experience
that troubleshooting encoding/Unicode problems in a web/db app can be
difficult, especially with multiple conversions at different stages,
but I've come up with a short generic
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 08:58:04PM +0200, Stephan Jennewein wrote:
Hi,
is it possible to use ldap to authenticate and dbic (a database) to handle
the
user role relation ? So that it works like it resides all in one storage
backend.
If yes how do I configure that in the $application.conf
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 02:26:41PM -0500, Jonathan Hall wrote:
Not directly... it's not even possible in DBIC to have relationships
between different databases, which is essentially what you're talking
about doing.
Unless you count mysql as a database in which case -table('otherdb.foo')
On 1 Oct 2008, at 02:05, Matt S Trout wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 08:58:04PM +0200, Stephan Jennewein wrote:
Hi,
is it possible to use ldap to authenticate and dbic (a database)
to handle the
user role relation ? So that it works like it resides all in one
storage
backend.
If yes how
On 1 Oct 2008, at 01:44, Stephan Jennewein wrote:
On Wednesday 01 October 2008 12:39:08 am Andy Grundman wrote:
What Catalyst engine are you using? What you described sounds like
the behavior with the default HTTP engine. If that's what you're
using, try enabling fork mode with -f.
I'm
Tomas Doran wrote on 9/30/08 8:24 PM:
Splitting the current LDAP code so that it could be either a store
and/or credential also wouldn't be hard, and I volunteer to help with
the effort.
yes, that's a good idea. The current LDAP auth plugin is in the Store namespace
but does both Store and
Hello Stephan,
The short answer is yes, it is possible. But you will need to do some
work to make it happen.
The long answer is Yee. Basically, Catalyst authentication
is split into two pieces Credentials and Stores. A Store finds / holds
the users. A credential is responsible for
25 matches
Mail list logo
