What are the advantages/disadvantages for choosing between
Catalyst::Controller::FormBuilder and Catalyst::Controller::HTML:FormFu?
--
Kiffin Gish kiffin.g...@planet.nl
Gouda, The Netherlands
___
List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Listinfo:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Kiffin Gishkiffin.g...@planet.nl wrote:
What are the advantages/disadvantages for choosing between
Catalyst::Controller::FormBuilder and Catalyst::Controller::HTML:FormFu?
Those two are not the only options. Have a look at:
2009/6/10 Kiffin Gish kiffin.g...@planet.nl:
What are the advantages/disadvantages for choosing between
Catalyst::Controller::FormBuilder and Catalyst::Controller::HTML:FormFu?
CGI::FormBuilder, HTML::FormFu and the myriad other form modules each
approach the problem in rather different ways,
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 10:26 PM, Tomas Doran bobtf...@bobtfish.net wrote:
This (and the ugly password box) is why most 'internet' websites implement
auth with a login form - you can be a lot more flexible about the level of
user-authenticity you require at each stage...
Thanks for the
2009/6/9 Francesc Romà i Frigolé
francesc.roma+catal...@gmail.comfrancesc.roma%2bcatal...@gmail.com
I'm trying the new feature $c-req-remote_user introduced in 5.80005. I'd
like to know if it is possible to tell apache, in a .htaccess file, to not
ask authentication for a certain set of URIs
Good evening,
On 10/06/09 at 10:40 AM +0200, Francesc Romà i Frigolé
francesc.roma+catal...@gmail.com wrote:
1) static performance: serving static files directly from apache is much
faster than through catalyst. I find it specially noticeable with big files
like large pictures and pdfs. Some
On 10 Jun 2009, at 06:23, kmx wrote:
Erm, no - $c-authenticate will _always_ succeed if you're using
Credential::Remote, as the web server above you will have always
authenticated you already..
In fact there are some situations where Credential::Remote's
authenticate(..) can fail:
One
On 6 Jun 2009, at 23:57, Bill Moseley wrote:
In other words, it provides a way for users to generate their own
session ids as long as it passes the validate_session_id method,
which doesn't take much.
http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/Catalyst/Catalyst-Plugin-Session/
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Kiffin Gish kiffin.g...@planet.nl wrote:
What are the advantages/disadvantages for choosing between
Catalyst::Controller::FormBuilder and Catalyst::Controller::HTML:FormFu?
FormBuilder is popular because is an older and stable project. It doesn't
seem very
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Charlie Garrison garri...@zeta.org.auwrote:
You might be looking for mod_auth_tkt. There is also x-sendfile but I don't
have experience with that one.
mod_auth_tkt looks interesting but I wonder if it would interrupt the normal
flow of the application in
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Tomas Doran bobtf...@bobtfish.net wrote:
On 10 Jun 2009, at 09:40, Francesc Romà i Frigolé wrote:
1) static performance: serving static files directly from apache is much
faster than through catalyst. I find it specially noticeable with big files
like large
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Tomas Doran bobtf...@bobtfish.net wrote:
On 10 Jun 2009, at 10:04, Francesc Romà i Frigolé wrote:
Also, in the static directory I could leave some things public ( css,
javascript, icons...) but make other private ( uploads, reports, ...) by
placing a
http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/Catalyst/Catalyst-Plugin-Session/0.00/trunk/t/live_session_fixation.t
I specifically wrote a test for this, however it's a test and not
comprehensive, and I can't see without spending time to take a
detailed look again if your case is proved or disproved
2009/6/10 Francesc Romà i Frigolé francesc.roma+catal...@gmail.com:
HTML:FormFu?
FormBuilder is popular because is an older and stable project. It doesn't
seem very active anymore though.
It's my understanding that the developer of FormBuilder does not work
with Perl any more. FormBuilder is
Francesc Romà i Frigolé wrote:
It looks very interesting but I wonder if my shared host provider
(asmallorange) would agree to install it.
You're worrying about the efficiency of pushing bytes around, but you're
using shared hosting.
Surely this is premature optimisation?
Cheers
t0m
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 10:26:36AM +0100, Tomas Doran wrote:
I specifically wrote a test for this, however it's a test and not
comprehensive, and I can't see without spending time to take a detailed
look again if your case is proved or disproved by this test.
This is a problem in our code
wich methods do you use to distribute a catalyst application from on box to
another.
and suposse this box has diferent operating system, i ment one has suse and the
other redhat.
what are you recomendations
Patricio Bruna V.
IT Linux Ltda.
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Tomas Doran bobtf...@bobtfish.net wrote:
You're worrying about the efficiency of pushing bytes around, but you're
using shared hosting.
Surely this is premature optimisation?
t0m,
The applications I'm writing are expected to have a relatively small number
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 07:40:44AM -0700, Bill Moseley wrote:
[1] Yes, it's a store, not a cache.
Ha! Morning post.
It's a cache not a store. But we use it as a store.
--
Bill Moseley.
mose...@hank.org
Sent from my iMutt
___
List:
Francesc Romà i Frigolé wrote:
The applications I'm writing are expected to have a relatively small
number of users. From my experience so far the performance is quite good
on a shared hosting as long as I serve the static content from outside
Catalyst. Otherwise performance degrades
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 5:33 PM, Tomas Doran bobtf...@bobtfish.net wrote:
Francesc Romà i Frigolé wrote:
The applications I'm writing are expected to have a relatively small
number of users. From my experience so far the performance is quite good on
a shared hosting as long as I serve the
Patricio A. Bruna wrote:
wich methods do you use to distribute a catalyst application from on box
to another.
and suposse this box has diferent operating system, i ment one has suse
and the other redhat.
what are you recomendations
Don't do that.
Having an app balanced across two totally
Francesc Romà i Frigolé wrote:
I did my tests some months
ago with smaller files (1-5 MB) and I don't remember the exact results
now, but I clearly remember that it made a very significant difference.
Hmm, well, with smaller files you have tcp slow start, and other effects
that can cloud
Maybe i explain wrong.
I did not mean load balance, i meant deployment.
i develop my app on my box, and then i need to deploy it on the production
server, with the same operating system. downloading all the modules from cpan
is time consuming, are any better way?
Patricio A. Bruna wrote:
Maybe i explain wrong.
I did not mean load balance, i meant deployment.
i develop my app on my box, and then i need to deploy it on the
production server, with the same operating system. downloading all the
modules from cpan is time consuming, are any better way?
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 08:14:10PM +0300, Octavian Râşniţă wrote:
BTW, regarding local::lib, does anyone know how can I force install a
module that gives an error under Windows when I use it?
The same way you force install anything using the CPAN shell.
CPAN force install Some::Module
hdp.
From: Tomas Doran bobtf...@bobtfish.net
Patricio A. Bruna wrote:
Maybe i explain wrong.
I did not mean load balance, i meant deployment.
i develop my app on my box, and then i need to deploy it on the
production server, with the same operating system. downloading all the
modules from cpan is
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Tomas Doran bobtf...@bobtfish.net wrote:
This is neat, but in no way taking advantage of the new Moose code.
I have some code in the CatalystX::DynamicComponent namespace meant to
solve this problem:
From: Stuart Watt
Why would you do that? If the module you're installing fails its tests, you
should file a bug report. What kind of error? IME you shouldn't ever want to or
need to force install a module. This should be a *colossal* red flag to you.
...
/joel
It is very possible
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 10:33:26PM +0300, Octavian Râşniţă wrote:
When using this syntax, where can I specify the local path where I want
to install the Some::Module?
You never do that with local::lib. It sets up the env variables for you
(PERL_MM_OPT and MODULEBUILDRC) -- CPAN.pm doesn't
30 matches
Mail list logo
