On Mon, 24 Dec 2007 18:22:13 +
Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You might want to see about ripping out the C::M::DBI connection
management and using a DBIx::Class::Storage::DBI object instead - the
Model::DBI code originates from a copy of the DBIx::Class code but
I'm unaware of
On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 12:21:00AM -0700, Kevin Nathan wrote:
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 15:34:14 +1030
Jon Schutz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems to me you would know about it, one way or another, if you had
3000 apache processes!
It would seem so, wouldn't it? :-) From what I remember,
Just for background, I have inherited a
Catalyst/TT/Postgresql/Apache2/mod_perl web application. The
programmer that was responsible for the design and initial coding left
our company and is unavailable for consults. I am very new to
Catalyst, fair level of experience in TT, Perl and
On Fri, 2007-12-21 at 18:34 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The program seems to be working fine while on the Catalyst test
server, and when on an Apache/mod_perl server when the postgres
database is on the same physical server. The database connections
don't start leaking until we
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 13:32:00 +1030
Jon Schutz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-12-21 at 18:34 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The program seems to be working fine while on the Catalyst test
server, and when on an Apache/mod_perl server when the postgres
database is on the same
On Fri, 2007-12-21 at 21:32 -0700, Kevin Nathan wrote:
I can't check the server right now (need to be at work for that), but I
didn't think to watch for Apache/mod_perl processes. What we were
looking for was port 5432 connections (postgres). When it works, we get
two or three connections
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 15:34:14 +1030
Jon Schutz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems to me you would know about it, one way or another, if you had
3000 apache processes!
It would seem so, wouldn't it? :-) From what I remember, though, we
never saw a real increase in port 443 connections.
I would
