Re: [Catalyst] OT: Use the CPAN, Luke? (was: Catalyst install failure due to Mouse.pm on Debian Etch)

2008-11-28 Thread Lars Balker Rasmussen
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 03:55:54AM +0100, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote: Case in point, Mouse is essentially Moose Light. Since Catalyst itself is becoming Moose-based, is there *any* reason to use Mouse instead? I suppose if it automatically stubs itself into a Moose loader where Moose is

Re: [Catalyst] OT: Use the CPAN, Luke? (was: Catalyst install failure due to Mouse.pm on Debian Etch)

2008-11-27 Thread Zbigniew Lukasiak
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 3:55 AM, Aristotle Pagaltzis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Toby Corkindale [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-11-27 01:55]: The problem is the dependency Mouse (0.11) fails its unit tests there. That's really the sole solid argument against a flamboyant use-the-CPAN attitude: you

[Catalyst] OT: Use the CPAN, Luke? (was: Catalyst install failure due to Mouse.pm on Debian Etch)

2008-11-26 Thread Aristotle Pagaltzis
* Toby Corkindale [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-11-27 01:55]: The problem is the dependency Mouse (0.11) fails its unit tests there. That’s really the sole solid argument against a flamboyant use-the-CPAN attitude: you end up pulling in heaps of bloat because none of the stuff was written to form a