On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 11:36 PM, Peter Karmanpe...@peknet.com wrote:
There really is no method called 'storage' in DBIx::Class::ResultSet, so at
least the error message is telling the truth.
- $self-app_class-model( $self-model_name )-storage-sqlt_type
+$self-app_class-model( $self-model_name
Eden Cardim wrote on 07/17/2009 06:51 AM:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 11:36 PM, Peter Karmanpe...@peknet.com wrote:
There really is no method called 'storage' in DBIx::Class::ResultSet, so at
least the error message is telling the truth.
- $self-app_class-model( $self-model_name
Hi,
Am 13.07.2009 um 15:57 schrieb Carl Johnstone:
Look at the +Parent option, which will create additional separate perl
interpreters within the same apache process on a per-virtual-host
basis.
where can I find information about this +Parent option?
matt
--
rainboxx Matthias Dietrich
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 04:33:59PM +0200, Matthias Dietrich wrote:
where can I find information about this +Parent option?
http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/user/config/config.html#C_Parent_
--
Chisel Wright
e: chi...@herlpacker.co.uk
w: http://www.herlpacker.co.uk/
What do you call a chav in
Why not use the same uri and check the Accept header?
Am Donnerstag, den 16.07.2009, 21:22 +0200 schrieb Tomas Doran:
On 16 Jul 2009, at 16:30, Derek Wueppelmann wrote:
sub json : Chained('/') ChainedArgs(0) {
my ($self, $c) = @_;
Is this something that is possible? Should I even
Hi there,
It seems that http://matrix.cpantesters.org/?dist=LWPx-ParanoidAgent+1.05
fails on every front (and if you check the history it wasn't much
better in previous releases). So what you guys use as the LWP agent
for OpenID authentication?
--
Zbigniew Lukasiak
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 20:22 +0100, Tomas Doran wrote:
package MyApp::Controller::JSON;
with 'MyApp::Stuff';
sub root : Chained('/') PathPart('json') CaptureArgs(0) {}
Will give you:
/thingie
and
/json/thingie
This seems to be a decent option. However this will result in a fair
number
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Zbigniew Lukasiak wrote:
It seems that http://matrix.cpantesters.org/?dist=LWPx-ParanoidAgent+1.05
fails on every front (and if you check the history it wasn't much
better in previous releases). So what you guys use as the LWP agent
for OpenID
Yep. Sorry. I am working on a new one. Just keep getting stuck trying
to update the tests to run correctly. I'll commit to getting a new
one out this weekend even if I have to TODO the live tests for now.
The real issue here though is that using LWP::UA instead of
ParanoidAgent is a
I actually applied the same patch against its SVN repository a few
weeks ago. I'll poke Brad to make a new release on CPAN.
http://code.sixapart.com/svn/LWPx-ParanoidAgent/trunk/
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Ashleya...@sedition.com wrote:
Brad Fitzpatrick and friends have done a great job
10 matches
Mail list logo