Re: [Catalyst] CatalystX::CRUD Storage Error

2009-07-17 Thread Eden Cardim
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 11:36 PM, Peter Karmanpe...@peknet.com wrote: There really is no method called 'storage' in DBIx::Class::ResultSet, so at least the error message is telling the truth. - $self-app_class-model( $self-model_name )-storage-sqlt_type +$self-app_class-model( $self-model_name

Re: [Catalyst] CatalystX::CRUD Storage Error

2009-07-17 Thread Peter Karman
Eden Cardim wrote on 07/17/2009 06:51 AM: On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 11:36 PM, Peter Karmanpe...@peknet.com wrote: There really is no method called 'storage' in DBIx::Class::ResultSet, so at least the error message is telling the truth. - $self-app_class-model( $self-model_name

Re: [Catalyst] Configuration based on hostname

2009-07-17 Thread Matthias Dietrich
Hi, Am 13.07.2009 um 15:57 schrieb Carl Johnstone: Look at the +Parent option, which will create additional separate perl interpreters within the same apache process on a per-virtual-host basis. where can I find information about this +Parent option? matt -- rainboxx Matthias Dietrich

Re: [Catalyst] Configuration based on hostname

2009-07-17 Thread Chisel Wright
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 04:33:59PM +0200, Matthias Dietrich wrote: where can I find information about this +Parent option? http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/user/config/config.html#C_Parent_ -- Chisel Wright e: chi...@herlpacker.co.uk w: http://www.herlpacker.co.uk/ What do you call a chav in

Re: [Catalyst] Multiple Chain Actions

2009-07-17 Thread Alexander Hartmaier
Why not use the same uri and check the Accept header? Am Donnerstag, den 16.07.2009, 21:22 +0200 schrieb Tomas Doran: On 16 Jul 2009, at 16:30, Derek Wueppelmann wrote: sub json : Chained('/') ChainedArgs(0) { my ($self, $c) = @_; Is this something that is possible? Should I even

[Catalyst] OpenID authentication and LWPx-ParanoidAgent

2009-07-17 Thread Zbigniew Lukasiak
Hi there, It seems that http://matrix.cpantesters.org/?dist=LWPx-ParanoidAgent+1.05 fails on every front (and if you check the history it wasn't much better in previous releases). So what you guys use as the LWP agent for OpenID authentication? -- Zbigniew Lukasiak

Re: [Catalyst] Multiple Chain Actions

2009-07-17 Thread Derek Wueppelmann
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 20:22 +0100, Tomas Doran wrote: package MyApp::Controller::JSON; with 'MyApp::Stuff'; sub root : Chained('/') PathPart('json') CaptureArgs(0) {} Will give you: /thingie and /json/thingie This seems to be a decent option. However this will result in a fair number

Re: [Catalyst] OpenID authentication and LWPx-ParanoidAgent

2009-07-17 Thread Bogdan Lucaciu
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Zbigniew Lukasiak wrote: It seems that http://matrix.cpantesters.org/?dist=LWPx-ParanoidAgent+1.05 fails on every front (and if you check the history it wasn't much better in previous releases).   So what you guys use as the LWP agent for OpenID

Re: [Catalyst] OpenID authentication and LWPx-ParanoidAgent

2009-07-17 Thread Ashley
Yep. Sorry. I am working on a new one. Just keep getting stuck trying to update the tests to run correctly. I'll commit to getting a new one out this weekend even if I have to TODO the live tests for now. The real issue here though is that using LWP::UA instead of ParanoidAgent is a

Re: [Catalyst] OpenID authentication and LWPx-ParanoidAgent

2009-07-17 Thread Tatsuhiko Miyagawa
I actually applied the same patch against its SVN repository a few weeks ago. I'll poke Brad to make a new release on CPAN. http://code.sixapart.com/svn/LWPx-ParanoidAgent/trunk/ On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Ashleya...@sedition.com wrote: Brad Fitzpatrick and friends have done a great job