Re: [Catalyst] New Apress book shipping now from Amazon.com

2009-07-28 Thread Ali M.
The extra one is mine! Regards, Ali On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 11:06 PM, Darren Duncandar...@darrenduncan.net wrote: Darren Duncan wrote: Ari Constancio wrote: For those interested, Amazon.com is shipping now pre-orders for The Definitive Guide to Catalyst. Not sure about new orders, though.

Re: [Catalyst] New Apress book shipping now from Amazon.com

2009-07-28 Thread Darren Duncan
If you want it, you'll have to come here in person to pick it up. -- Darren Duncan Ali M. wrote: The extra one is mine! Regards, Ali On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 11:06 PM, Darren Duncandar...@darrenduncan.net wrote: Darren Duncan wrote: Ari Constancio wrote: For those interested, Amazon.com is

[Catalyst] RFC: no make install on catalyst apps

2009-07-28 Thread Devin Austin
Hi gang, There's been some discord as to whether or not Catalyst applications should/should not have the option of make install. Personally, I'm not really partial either way. Especially with the advent of tools like Dist::Zilla that allow you to keep track of the modules you need and build a

[Catalyst] RFC: Makefile warning in catalyst apps

2009-07-28 Thread Devin Austin
okay, I got this right this time. What are everyone's thoughts on including a warning and forced confirmation when a user goes to make install an application, be it downloaded from cpan or elsewhere? Something like, you are running make install, are you REALLY sure you want to install this

Re: [Catalyst] RFC: Makefile warning in catalyst apps

2009-07-28 Thread Ben Vinnerd
On 28/07/2009 09:27, Devin Austin wrote: okay, I got this right this time. What are everyone's thoughts on including a warning and forced confirmation when a user goes to make install an application, be it downloaded from cpan or elsewhere? Something like, you are running make install, are

Re: [Catalyst] RFC: Makefile warning in catalyst apps

2009-07-28 Thread Ash Berlin
On 28 Jul 2009, at 09:27, Devin Austin wrote: okay, I got this right this time. What are everyone's thoughts on including a warning and forced confirmation when a user goes to make install an application, be it downloaded from cpan or elsewhere? Something like, you are running make

Re: [Catalyst] RFC: Makefile warning in catalyst apps

2009-07-28 Thread Devin Austin
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 2:45 AM, Ben Vinnerd ben-catal...@vinnerd.comwrote: On 28/07/2009 09:27, Devin Austin wrote: okay, I got this right this time. What are everyone's thoughts on including a warning and forced confirmation when a user goes to make install an application, be it

Re: [Catalyst] RFC: Makefile warning in catalyst apps

2009-07-28 Thread Ben Vinnerd
On 28/07/2009 09:52, Devin Austin wrote: I also thought --yarly (thanks rafl), --yesinstalldammit, --plztobeintallingz were excellent choices. He he :) ___ List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Listinfo:

Re: [Catalyst] CatalystX::CRUD Storage Error

2009-07-28 Thread Peter Karman
Amiri Barksdale wrote on 7/27/09 8:46 PM: On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 11:33:38PM -0500, Peter Karman wrote: | Also, your controller inherits from the base CatalystX::CRUD::Controller, which | doesn't really *do* anything by default. I.e., you need a form handler to | serialize and validate your

Re: [Catalyst] RFC: no make install on catalyst apps

2009-07-28 Thread Marcus Ramberg
I see catalyst apps being complete CPAN packages as a real advantage. Taking away the make install option seems very limiting, and destructive for no good purpose at all. For instance, my previous employer uses this functionality to build debian packages of all of their apps. With regards Marcus

[Catalyst] How to sign up...

2009-07-28 Thread Steve
Please help me figure out how I got signed up for this list. There is another gentleman in our company who would like to get these posts, but I can't seem to figure out how I got signed up! Thanks in advance, Steve -- Steve Schafer Matsch Systems Phone: 616-477-9629 Email: st...@matsch.com

Re: [Catalyst] How to sign up...

2009-07-28 Thread Ben Vinnerd
On 28/07/2009 14:29, Steve wrote: Please help me figure out how I got signed up for this list. There is another gentleman in our company who would like to get these posts, but I can't seem to figure out how I got signed up! Click on the Listinfo link at the bottom of this email! Ben

Re: [Catalyst] CatalystX::CRUD Storage Error

2009-07-28 Thread Peter Karman
Peter Karman wrote on 07/28/2009 07:51 AM: Amiri Barksdale wrote on 7/27/09 8:46 PM: On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 11:33:38PM -0500, Peter Karman wrote: | Also, your controller inherits from the base CatalystX::CRUD::Controller, which | doesn't really *do* anything by default. I.e., you need a form

[Catalyst] recommended/best practice way of serving static files after authentication?

2009-07-28 Thread John SJ Anderson
$WORK-mate is working on a Cat app that (among other things) allows authenticated users to download from a set of static files. He's wondering what the best way is to set things up so that the Cat app can handle the authentication/authorization parts of things but then hand the static

Fwd: [Catalyst] RFC: no make install on catalyst apps

2009-07-28 Thread Jeremiah C. Foster
O HAI! The debian-perl team has built packages for Catalyst to allow debian users easy installation and quality assurance. The addition of the proposed installation code in Catalyst would break current apps and would most likely be removed by debian / ubuntu because it fundamentally

Re: [Catalyst] How to sign up...

2009-07-28 Thread Steve
Thanks much.  I found it a couple seconds after I sent the message.  I have been watching this list as I try to learn about Catalyst, and evaluate it's potential for future software development within our firm.  I am impressed by the sharing of information, most of which seems to be geared

Re: [Catalyst] RFC: no make install on catalyst apps

2009-07-28 Thread Moritz Onken
Am 28.07.2009 um 09:46 schrieb Devin Austin: Hi gang, There's been some discord as to whether or not Catalyst applications should/should not have the option of make install. Personally, I'm not really partial either way. Especially with the advent of tools like Dist::Zilla that allow

Re: [Catalyst] RFC: no make install on catalyst apps

2009-07-28 Thread Ash Berlin
On 28 Jul 2009, at 14:48, Jeremiah C. Foster wrote: O HAI! The debian-perl team has built packages for Catalyst to allow debian users easy installation and quality assurance. The addition of the proposed installation code in Catalyst would break current apps and would most likely be

Re: [Catalyst] 10 Catalyst Models in 10 Days wrapping up-ish

2009-07-28 Thread Ashley
On Jul 27, 2009, at 7:16 AM, Octavian Râsnita wrote: From: Ashley a...@sedition.com Hey, all. http://sedition.com/a/2733 is mostly done (I have serious repairs to do to make #9 work and might drop it entirely for a second stringer) Hi, Thank you for it. In the first model (Random

Re: [Catalyst] New Apress book shipping now from Amazon.com

2009-07-28 Thread Gavin Henry
Got mine yesterday finally from Amazon. Ordered it ages ago. Can't wait to get into it! Cheers. -- http://www.suretecsystems.com/services/openldap/ http://www.suretectelecom.com ___ List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Listinfo:

Re: [Catalyst] 10 Catalyst Models in 10 Days wrapping up-ish

2009-07-28 Thread Octavian Râsnita
From: Ashley a...@sedition.com Since we're on the subject, #9 TheSchwartz, is pretty clean now, in part thanks to Oleg Kostyuk who just alerted me to a problem. And the git depot has downloads with all the stuff working (once you do the dependencies):

Re: [Catalyst] paging with Data::Page

2009-07-28 Thread Anne Wainwright
Thanks, Michael, On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 14:10:23 -0500 Michael Reddick michael.redd...@gmail.com wrote: does anyone else have a suggestion? try this: $c-stash-{result} = $result = $result-page($page) Nope:( no change, more detail on happenings in reply to Ian Anne

Re: [Catalyst] paging with Data::Page

2009-07-28 Thread Anne Wainwright
Hi, Ian See below, On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 21:32:36 +0100 Ian Sillitoe i...@sillit.com wrote: Could be wrong, but I think the former is causing the resultset to be evaluated as an array and is therefore returning all the entries before the pager is being applied. Apologies - I was

Re: [Catalyst] recommended/best practice way of serving static files after authentication?

2009-07-28 Thread Tomas Doran
On 28 Jul 2009, at 14:55, Ash Berlin wrote: On 28 Jul 2009, at 14:42, John SJ Anderson wrote: $WORK-mate is working on a Cat app that (among other things) allows authenticated users to download from a set of static files. He's wondering what the best way is to set things up so that the

Re: [Catalyst] RFC: no make install on catalyst apps

2009-07-28 Thread Tomas Doran
On 28 Jul 2009, at 14:14, Marcus Ramberg wrote: I see catalyst apps being complete CPAN packages as a real advantage. Taking away the make install option seems very limiting +1 I would very much support moving to a 'real' sharedir for templates / config etc, rather than the current hacks

Re: [Catalyst] 10 Catalyst Models in 10 Days wrapping up-ish

2009-07-28 Thread Tomas Doran
On 28 Jul 2009, at 18:21, Octavian Râsnita wrote: MooseX::TheSchwartz I haven't even looked at this, other than to note that it wins the worst named module EVAR prize (as MooseX:: is a namespace for Moose extensions, which this blatantly isn't). Cheers t0m

Re: [Catalyst] recommended/best practice way of serving static files after authentication?

2009-07-28 Thread Peter Karman
Tomas Doran wrote on 7/28/09 7:25 PM: On 28 Jul 2009, at 14:55, Ash Berlin wrote: On 28 Jul 2009, at 14:42, John SJ Anderson wrote: $WORK-mate is working on a Cat app that (among other things) allows authenticated users to download from a set of static files. He's wondering what the

Re: [Catalyst] 10 Catalyst Models in 10 Days wrapping up-ish

2009-07-28 Thread Octavian Rasnita
From: Tomas Doran bobtf...@bobtfish.net On 28 Jul 2009, at 18:21, Octavian Râsnita wrote: MooseX::TheSchwartz I haven't even looked at this, other than to note that it wins the worst named module EVAR prize (as MooseX:: is a namespace for Moose extensions, which this blatantly isn't). Cheers