On 17/07/2010 19:55, Curtis Jewell wrote:
Also, can I use the crop circles icon as part of the web link for
Catalyst in the Start menu? Or are there legal issues with that?
You can use the crop circle for Catalyst links - Shadowcat bought the
rights to the original image (before the Cat.
On 18/07/2010 11:35, Mark Keating wrote:
On 17/07/2010 19:55, Curtis Jewell wrote:
Also, can I use the crop circles icon as part of the web link for
Catalyst in the Start menu? Or are there legal issues with that?
You can use the crop circle for Catalyst links - Shadowcat bought the
rights to
Hi,
I need to make a program that shares the sessions with another program which is
made in PHP and I thought the easiest way would be to generate the session data
on the server using PHP::Session.
The PHP session file names are of the form sess_po0nkrgqkjcbx7jb2z1ug17vwn.
I was able to
On 17 Jul 2010, at 18:58, Alejandro Imass wrote:
I am confused now. mod_worker will share the same code segment for
sure, and if you said earlier that in some scenarios where the code
segment is shared (i.e. two _threads_ using the same model instance)
the ACCEPT_CONTEXT call will override any
On 16 Jul 2010, at 17:55, Rob Hoelz wrote:
This way, applications requiring a custom load order can override
determine_component_load_order if they which,
and plugins can override it to provide cool features like dependency
resolution.
Thoughts?
This year's GSOC project is to put
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Tomas Doran bobtf...@bobtfish.net wrote:
On 17 Jul 2010, at 18:58, Alejandro Imass wrote:
I am confused now. mod_worker will share the same code segment for
sure, and if you said earlier that in some scenarios where the code
segment is shared (i.e. two
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Alejandro Imass
alejandro.im...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Tomas Doran bobtf...@bobtfish.net wrote:
On 17 Jul 2010, at 18:58, Alejandro Imass wrote:
[..]
Perl code isn't in the 'code segment' of your process.
As it's compiled and run
On 18 Jul 2010, at 19:58, Alejandro Imass wrote:
So in conclusion, it seems reasonable to say that I should not worry
about the global vars (the Moose object attributes) in my Model
Instance to get overridden by the ACCEPT_CONTEXT call, as this call
will only be called once in sequence with a
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Tomas Doran bobtf...@bobtfish.net wrote:
On 18 Jul 2010, at 19:58, Alejandro Imass wrote:
So in conclusion, it seems reasonable to say that I should not worry
about the global vars (the Moose object attributes) in my Model
Instance to get overridden by the
On 18 Jul 2010, at 21:42, Alejandro Imass wrote:
Ok. already! ;-) I have a big bump in my forehead from all this
headbanging. With the headache and all I think I finally
understand...I hope... In my case I need a model that creates an
object to handle every request individually so:
Yep, you
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Tomas Doran bobtf...@bobtfish.net wrote:
On 18 Jul 2010, at 21:42, Alejandro Imass wrote:
[..,]
No, Catalyst::Model::Factory does _exactly_ and _only_ this for you, so you
probably/possibly want to use that rather than writing it yourself :)
Yeah, I saw the
11 matches
Mail list logo
