Re: [Catalyst] working around request timeouts

On 21 Aug 2012, at 17:54, James R. Leu wrote: > Chakkit et. al. > > Catalyst::Plugin::RunAfterRequest ended up being the easiest first step. > Thank you Chakkit, for the suggestion. > > Now that I have this implemented I'm seeing why a work queue system > is needed if this fix needs to be more

Re: [Catalyst] working around request timeouts

Chakkit et. al. Catalyst::Plugin::RunAfterRequest ended up being the easiest first step. Thank you Chakkit, for the suggestion. Now that I have this implemented I'm seeing why a work queue system is needed if this fix needs to be more then an interim solution. I quickly use up all the child proce

[Catalyst] Create Issue with CRUD application

Hi, I'm new to the Catalyst architecture and have been working through some examples to learn the ropes. However, in the application I am working on, I am able to Update, but not Create a new record. I am using HTML::FormHandler and I believe that the inability to Create a new record has someth

[Catalyst] many to many join with multicolumn primary key

Hi. Posted this to the DBIx::Class maillist, but not getting an traction there.   Perhaps someone else has run into this issue on a Catalyst app. I need to connect two tables through a relation table for a many_to_many.  The issue I'm running into is that one of the tables has a composite prima

Re: [Catalyst] working around request timeouts

Agree. I assumed that client code can be changed to use queue tickets instead of long-time requests, which isn't good anyway. 2012/8/21 Bill Moseley > > > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Sergey Dmitriev < > sergey.program...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Looks like what you need is the job queue. Tak