Re: [Catalyst] Re: Response traits.

2013-11-01 Thread Bill Moseley
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 8:31 AM, John Napiorkowski wrote: > I think a patch that made sure strings being set to location conformed to > the expected standard would be very welcomed! > > on the other hand I thought this was also caught by > > https://metacpan.org/pod/Plack::Middleware::Lint > Yes,

Re: [Catalyst] $c->write() buffering?

2013-11-01 Thread John Napiorkowski
I was reviewing code last night for release of Catalyst Hamburg dev5 and saw that $c->res->write is just calling the writer under the hood.  So as long as your headers are ready to finalize, that should be fine as well.  Just remember this approach is going to block, so be careful with anything

Re: [Catalyst] Mocking PSGI layers in Test WWW Mechanize Catalyst

2013-11-01 Thread John Napiorkowski
Catalyst::Test uses Plack::Test under the hood.  That mangle_response stuff is mostly evil :) Sounds like you are saying you'd like to apply Plack Middleware during testing.  The latest dev release on CPAN lets you configure middleware via configuration, so you could have some middleware in you

Re: [Catalyst] Re: Response traits.

2013-11-01 Thread John Napiorkowski
I think a patch that made sure strings being set to location conformed to the expected standard would be very welcomed! on the other hand I thought this was also caught by  https://metacpan.org/pod/Plack::Middleware::Lint as well?  In any case Catalyst response could reject any attempts to set