?
-Ashley
On Dec 31, 2007, at 8:25 PM, Ashley Pond V wrote:
I'm sorry if this is a stupid question but I'm not in a position to
test it myself at the moment.
Does uri_for respect https/http? I have some that are coming up
http when the requested resource is https. I know I have a rewrite
rule
This may or may not be germane: try installing JSON::XS and updating
your JSON and JSON::Any. JSON::XS is one of, if not the, fastest
serializers in all data classes and its utf8 handling is better. JSON
now, IIRC, calls it if it's present instead of its older Perl version.
-Ashley
On Jan
a better example, I'll gladly add it. I'm
not familiar with Config::General (the example config is from a
patch).
-Ashley
___
List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Jason Kohles em...@jasonkohles.com wrote:
Unless you are referring to the old licensing scheme (which went away some
time ago) then discouraging ExtJS use because of it's license is absurd, as
the license is GPL. They do have a commercial license available
]} }
http://sedition.com/a/2742
-Ashley
___
List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Bill Moseley mose...@hank.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Nicholas Wehr catal...@bionikchickens.com
wrote:
so which engine and version are you using? apache? built-in http? fastcgi?
Apache, but that message is in Catalyst::Engine parent class.
HTML::FormHandler
Chiming in: FormHandler has been getting the most questions lately,
IIRC, but I suspect FormFu is more often used. It has its own
excellent mailing list (made excellent by the main dev, Carl Franks,
who is very responsive and helpful) so the questions don't tend to end
up here.
? They were
round, once.
-ashley
___
List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
someone has an updated diagram (or can update this one)?
I did that diagram a loong time ago (2006?). I'd be glad
to amend it and I can see obvious changes it needs but I'd probably
need input from core devs to round it out perfectly.
-Ashley
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 6:11 AM, will trillich
will.trill...@serensoft.com wrote:
That's a neat trick -- hadn't heard of that one before. But the javascript
isn't our nonsecure-items problem.
Protocol free // isn't a javascript specific technique while we're on
it. It simply means use the
. If you're
trying to shoehorn in something dissimilar, you might be making a
mistake.
-Ashley
___
List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 9:22 PM, John M. Dlugosz wxju46g...@snkmail.com wrote:
On 2/25/2011 9:30 AM, Ashley Pond V apv-at-sedition.com |Catalyst/Allow to
home| wrote:
What t0m suggested is perfectly fine but if you want to mimic the DBIC
API with a different engine, this example does
Let's end this thread; 23 messages is enough and the topic is barely
more relevant to Catalyst than What kind of lunch should I have?
___
List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable
is pretty awful in my opinion) without
some kind of comparison/contrast and real examples is not really
helpful.
-Ashley
___
List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail
, since it won't work if
there
are query arguments.
Why won't it work if there are query arguments? Seems correct to me.
Using the fragment is probably a bad idea. It's not supported by all
servers so it can end up lost on the backend depending on your setup.
-Ashley
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Ronald J Kimball
rkimb...@pangeamedia.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 3:25 PM, John M. Dlugosz wxju46g...@snkmail.com
wrote:
On 3/7/2011 1:35 PM, Ashley Pond V apv-at-sedition.com |Catalyst/Allow to
home| wrote:
Using the fragment is probably a bad idea
2011/3/7 Adam Sjøgren a...@koldfront.dk:
On Mon, 7 Mar 2011 13:01:42 -0800, Ashley wrote:
What Ronald said + the #fragment is not passed along in the available
ENV with some servers and setups. In these cases it doesn't exist as
far as the backend is concerned. If you rely on it for dispatch
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Ronald J Kimball
rkimb...@pangeamedia.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Ashley Pond V a...@sedition.com wrote:
Well, the original message was:
How do I call uri_for_action and pass it the '#id' part? It's not an arg
and it's not part of the query
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 12:10 AM, Tomas Doran bobtf...@bobtfish.net wrote:
On 13 Mar 2011, at 14:46, ryan lauterbach wrote:
Even if the
URL is inproperly formed I think Catalyst should handle it gracefully.
I entirely agree with this.
At the very least, we should serve a 400 (bad request)
was discussed in 2008 : see
http://lists.scsys.co.uk/pipermail/catalyst/2008-March/017748.html
and the rest of the thread.
It was actually discussed a year before that:
http://lists.scsys.co.uk/pipermail/catalyst/2007-July/014507.html
The idea suffered from similar lack of tuits at the time.
-Ashley
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 7:00 AM, Alejandro Imass
alejandro.im...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Alejandro Imass
alejandro.im...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 7:06 PM, Benjamin Hitz h...@stanford.edu wrote:
[...]
I tried to make it as practical as possible:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:58 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav d...@des.no wrote:
As an alternate solution, is there a way to have it use a different file
name every time it starts?
Here's a snippet to do that:
conf.yml
--
Plugin::Session:
storage: /tmp/some-prefix-__UID__.session
MyApp.pm
--
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 7:42 AM, Alexander Hartmaier
alexander.hartma...@t-systems.at wrote:
Because I've just read perlvar: $REAL_USER_ID or $UID instead of $.
I think this is generally excellent advice but I want to argue against
it in this case.
UID = sub { $ } is sufficiently semantic *and*
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Devin Austin devin.aus...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 3:50 AM, Tim Anderson tja...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a handful of java servlets that I would like to 'front-end' with my
Catalyst application, essentially using Catalyst to provide
Blast from the past:
http://grokbase.com/t/sc/catalyst/077e7jhw9g/rfc-catalyst-plugin-errorout
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Bill Moseley mose...@hank.org wrote:
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Aristotle Pagaltzis pagalt...@gmx.dewrote:
* Bill Moseley mose...@hank.org [2013-05-09
for the future.
-Ashley
___
List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
A View is fine but because there is a format for files and it's
natural to show/deliver content with a view.
The view is going to be very THIN though. Basically nothing but a
wrapper around what iCalendar really is which is data and therefore
the Model domain. The view will essentially be
101 - 127 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
