On Jul 27, 2009, at 7:16 AM, Octavian Râsnita wrote:
From: Ashley a...@sedition.com Hey, all.
http://sedition.com/a/2733 is mostly done (I have serious repairs
to do to make #9 work and might drop it entirely for a second
stringer)
Hi,
Thank you for it.
In the first model (Random
From: Ashley a...@sedition.com
Since we're on the subject, #9 TheSchwartz, is pretty clean now, in part
thanks to Oleg Kostyuk who just alerted me to a problem. And the git
depot has downloads with all the stuff working (once you do the
dependencies):
On 28 Jul 2009, at 18:21, Octavian Râsnita wrote:
MooseX::TheSchwartz
I haven't even looked at this, other than to note that it wins the
worst named module EVAR prize (as MooseX:: is a namespace for Moose
extensions, which this blatantly isn't).
Cheers
t0m
From: Tomas Doran bobtf...@bobtfish.net
On 28 Jul 2009, at 18:21, Octavian Râsnita wrote:
MooseX::TheSchwartz
I haven't even looked at this, other than to note that it wins the
worst named module EVAR prize (as MooseX:: is a namespace for Moose
extensions, which this blatantly isn't).
Cheers
From: Ashley a...@sedition.com Hey, all.
http://sedition.com/a/2733 is mostly done (I have serious repairs to do
to make #9 work and might drop it entirely for a second stringer)
Hi,
Thank you for it.
In the first model (Random quotes), I've seen the following line:
sub get_one : method
Hey, all.
http://sedition.com/a/2733 is mostly done (I have serious repairs to
do to make #9 work and might drop it entirely for a second stringer)
with the last model entry, #10: Fixing your legacy code by not
fixing it, http://sedition.com/a/2743
To make it easy to play with and fix
I was with you right up until the word emacs ;-)
Seriously though, great work. And +1 for the dog-fooding too. I look
forward to the series unfolding.
RET
On 12/07/2009, at 5:53 PM, Ashley wrote:
I'm doing a series of short-ish articles called 10 Catalyst Models
in 10 Days
I'm doing a series of short-ish articles called 10 Catalyst Models
in 10 Days. It will be too light for a good slice of the list but
might be fun for some and potentially quite beneficial for newcomers.
They're not as polished, thorough, or proofed as I'd like--in fact,
only 7 of the 10
