I'm using debian stable since 3.0 after being pissed by RedHat shipping
unicode-horror perl 5.8.0 with custom + backported patches instead of
5.8.6 which was the newest stable version available at that time.
Never regretted it!
Am Donnerstag, den 06.08.2009, 12:50 +0200 schrieb Octavian Rasnita:
Hi,
Can you recommend a Linux distribution for production for Catalyst apps?
...and a version of Perl?
Thanks.
--
Octavian
___
List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable
On 6 Aug 2009, at 11:50, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
Hi,
Can you recommend a Linux distribution for production for Catalyst
apps?
...and a version of Perl?
I'm using both debian lenny (perl 5.10) and ubuntu hardy (perl 5.8) in
production.
I've never had a problem with the perl version
2009/8/6 Tomas Doran bobtf...@bobtfish.net:
On 6 Aug 2009, at 11:50, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
Hi,
Can you recommend a Linux distribution for production for Catalyst apps?
...and a version of Perl?
If this
is likely to be a problem for you / you're not willing to put the effort
into
2009/8/6 Octavian Rasnita orasn...@gmail.com:
Can you recommend a Linux distribution for production for Catalyst apps?
...and a version of Perl?
I've been using Arch Linux without a hitch to develop for years now.
Make sure you have a patched 5.10, otherwise you can get ambiguous
error
On 6 Aug 2009, at 19:16, Samuel Baldwin wrote:
Make sure you have a patched 5.10, otherwise you can get ambiguous
error messages. Catalyst will tell you if you're unpatched.
You're talking about 5.10.0 here.
At this point, I'd very much recommend using 5.10.1 RC1..
Cheers
t0m
