--- On Fri, 8/1/08, Jonathan Rockway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Jonathan Rockway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Catalyst] Squatting::On::Catalyst
> To: "The elegant MVC web framework"
> Date: Friday, August 1, 2008, 2:57 AM
> * On Tue, Jul 29
* On Tue, Jul 29 2008, John Beppu wrote:
> Now that composition and embedding of web apps is becoming a reality, we have
> to start anticipating needs like this. For example, the documentation for an
> app that's built to be embedded could state that:
Expectations suck. Use Ernst, tag your attri
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 12:02:08PM +0100, Ash Berlin wrote:
>
> On 30 Jul 2008, at 02:27, John Beppu wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 5:21 AM, Daniel McBrearty
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> >my 0.05 (possibly a bit OT) :
> >
> >Off-topic or not, I think these are interesting and va
--- On Wed, 7/30/08, Bruce Keeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Bruce Keeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Catalyst] Squatting::On::Catalyst
> To: "The elegant MVC web framework"
> Date: Wednesday, July 30, 2008, 3:38 PM
> Daniel McBrearty wr
Daniel McBrearty wrote:
The usual way to make things like this work is by having a
standardised api. In the case of membership for a website, it might
look something like:
get_unique_user_id # of logged in user
get_username_for_id( id )
Then if a forum has tables such as:
thread -> references
The usual way to make things like this work is by having a
standardised api. In the case of membership for a website, it might
look something like:
get_unique_user_id # of logged in user
get_username_for_id( id )
Then if a forum has tables such as:
thread -> references username
post -> ditto
an
--- On Wed, 7/30/08, Ash Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Ash Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Catalyst] Squatting::On::Catalyst
> To: "The elegant MVC web framework"
> Date: Wednesday, July 30, 2008, 7:02 AM
> On 30 Jul 2008, at 02:27, Jo
On 30 Jul 2008, at 02:27, John Beppu wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 5:21 AM, Daniel McBrearty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
my 0.05 (possibly a bit OT) :
Off-topic or not, I think these are interesting and valid questions.
I looked previously at a few ways of adding forums etc to the site
u
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 02:08:21PM +0100, Chisel Wright wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 02:21:10PM +0200, Daniel McBrearty wrote:
> > 1. letting users keep existing member and login creds
> > 2. being able to cross ref to other parts of the site eg. for a
> > certain node, easily have a "discussio
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 5:21 AM, Daniel McBrearty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> my 0.05 (possibly a bit OT) :
Off-topic or not, I think these are interesting and valid questions.
> I looked previously at a few ways of adding forums etc to the site
> using 3rd party code, indeed there are many
I've been meaning to dig into the everything2 code (which powers
perlmonks I think, amongst other things ..) and see how they do the
cross ref stuff. They seem to have a pretty nice "node" abstraction
which is the core of the problem, I think.
the membership stuff relies on a common API, I guess.
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 02:21:10PM +0200, Daniel McBrearty wrote:
> 1. letting users keep existing member and login creds
> 2. being able to cross ref to other parts of the site eg. for a
> certain node, easily have a "discussion" link, and the reverse link
> from the forum
If you ever think of a
my 0.05 (possibly a bit OT) :
I looked previously at a few ways of adding forums etc to the site
using 3rd party code, indeed there are many possibilites (some perl,
some not)
The thing that was always a sticker for me was getting some kind of
logical integration, ie:
1. letting users keep exist
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 09:36:44PM -0700, John Beppu wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 2:40 PM, Matt S Trout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 08:27:27AM -0700, John Beppu wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Imagine if you could install a blog, a wiki, a forum, or a store just as
> > > easil
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 2:40 PM, Matt S Trout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 08:27:27AM -0700, John Beppu wrote:
>
>
> > Imagine if you could install a blog, a wiki, a forum, or a store just as
> > easily.
>
> Yeah, we'll be doing that for arbitrary Catalyst components for 5.8
I'd like to express my interest in this project as well, kick ass!
-Devin
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 9:27 AM, John Beppu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> *Squatting::On::Catalyst*
>
> Squatting is a web microframework for Perl that's based on Camping from the
> Ruby world. During the transition from R
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 08:27:27AM -0700, John Beppu wrote:
> *Squatting::On::Catalyst*
>
> Squatting is a web microframework for Perl that's based on Camping from the
> Ruby world. During the transition from Ruby to Perl, Squatting gained some
> mutant powers which is why I'm writing to you toda
*Squatting::On::Catalyst*
Squatting is a web microframework for Perl that's based on Camping from the
Ruby world. During the transition from Ruby to Perl, Squatting gained some
mutant powers which is why I'm writing to you today.
One of Squatting's mutant powers is its ability to embed itself in
18 matches
Mail list logo
