On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Will Crawford
wrote:
>
>
>
> On 22 November 2012 17:03, Stephen Shorrock
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Lukas,
>>
>> Firstly thanks and secondly I take your point regarding the relationships.
>>
>> It seems sensible that I should create an object to manipulate a
>> Montage rat
On 22 November 2012 17:03, Stephen Shorrock wrote:
> Hi Lukas,
>
> Firstly thanks and secondly I take your point regarding the relationships.
>
> It seems sensible that I should create an object to manipulate a
> Montage rather than methods attached to other objects that seem to be
> modifying som
Hi Lukas,
Firstly thanks and secondly I take your point regarding the relationships.
It seems sensible that I should create an object to manipulate a
Montage rather than methods attached to other objects that seem to be
modifying something virtual. For example a Montage might have a
period assoc
Hi Stephen,
As far as I know, creating result class without underlying table is not
supported.
Having a class without table, but with relationships doesn't realy make
sense to me. A relationship always has two sides.
I am not sure if I really understand your problem. You have a "user"
table and
