[cayugabirds-l] Communication Towers and Migratory Bird Routes

2012-03-29 Thread Lisa Welch
Hello,

I am a planner with Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency and I'm 
researching migratory bird (or otherwise) regulatory requirements and/or 
recommended practices for proposed and existing towers.

Can anyone recommend a definitive guide for NYS?

Thanks.

--

Cayugabirds-L List Info:
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/CayugabirdsWELCOME
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/CayugabirdsRULES
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/CayugabirdsSubscribeConfigurationLeave.htm

ARCHIVES:
1) http://www.mail-archive.com/cayugabirds-l@cornell.edu/maillist.html
2) http://www.surfbirds.com/birdingmail/Group/Cayugabirds
3) http://birdingonthe.net/mailinglists/CAYU.html

Please submit your observations to eBird:
http://ebird.org/content/ebird/

--

Re: [cayugabirds-l] Communication Towers and Migratory Bird Routes

2012-03-29 Thread Bill Evans
Lisa,

Unlike for commercial wind energy, there are no specific NY guidelines for 
minimizing avian impacts of communcations towers (i.e., nothing from NYDEC).

The Federal guidelines put forth by the USFWS are pertinent for NY and can be 
found at the following link: 
http://www.fws.gov/habitatconservation/communicationtowers.html

Generally, towers should be kept as far away from the shores of Lake Ontario as 
possible, due to occasional large migratory bird concentrations there. Towers 
located within ~3 miles of the shoreline should be free-standing (no guy wires) 
and as short as possible. Towers should not be built near sources of bright 
permanent light (sports stadiums, convenient stores, etc.), which may lead to 
dense bird aggregations of disoriented birds on cloudy nights. Towers should 
use flashing (not steady-burning) aviation obstruction lighting if possible.

Bill Evans
www.towerkill.com

  - Original Message - 
  From: Lisa Welch 
  To: Cayugabirds-L@cornell.edu 
  Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 9:39 AM
  Subject: [cayugabirds-l] Communication Towers and Migratory Bird Routes


  Hello,


  I am a planner with Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency and I'm 
researching migratory bird (or otherwise) regulatory requirements and/or 
recommended practices for proposed and existing towers.


  Can anyone recommend a definitive guide for NYS?


  Thanks.
  --
  Cayugabirds-L List Info:
  Welcome and Basics
  Rules and Information
  Subscribe, Configuration and Leave
  Archives:
  The Mail Archive
  Surfbirds
  BirdingOnThe.Net
  Please submit your observations to eBird!
  --
--

Cayugabirds-L List Info:
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/CayugabirdsWELCOME
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/CayugabirdsRULES
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/CayugabirdsSubscribeConfigurationLeave.htm

ARCHIVES:
1) http://www.mail-archive.com/cayugabirds-l@cornell.edu/maillist.html
2) http://www.surfbirds.com/birdingmail/Group/Cayugabirds
3) http://birdingonthe.net/mailinglists/CAYU.html

Please submit your observations to eBird:
http://ebird.org/content/ebird/

--

Re: [cayugabirds-l] Communication Towers and Migratory Bird Routes

2012-03-29 Thread Lisa Welch
Thanks Bill,

Wouldn't this be true of other recognized migratory routes, wildlife refugees, 
or IBA, etc, for example, Montezuma?




 From: Bill Evans wrev...@clarityconnect.com
To: Lisa Welch welch_m_l...@yahoo.com; cayugabirds 
cayugabirds-l@cornell.edu 
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 10:16 AM
Subject: Re: [cayugabirds-l] Communication Towers and Migratory Bird Routes
 

 
Lisa,
 
Unlike for commercial wind energy, 
there are no specific NY guidelines for minimizing avian impacts of 
communcations towers (i.e., nothing from NYDEC).
 
The Federal guidelines put forth by the USFWS 
are pertinent for NY and can be found at the following link: 
http://www.fws.gov/habitatconservation/communicationtowers.html
 
Generally, towers should be kept as far away from 
the shores of Lake Ontario as possible, due to occasional large migratory bird 
concentrations there. Towers located within ~3 miles of the shoreline should be 
free-standing (no guy wires) and as short as possible. Towers should not be 
built near sources of bright permanent light (sports stadiums, convenient 
stores, etc.), which may lead to dense bird aggregations of disoriented birds 
on 
cloudy nights. Towers should use flashing (not steady-burning) aviation 
obstruction lighting if possible.
 
Bill Evans
www.towerkill.com
 
- Original Message - 
From: Lisa  Welch 
To: Cayugabirds-L@cornell.edu 
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 9:39  AM
Subject: [cayugabirds-l] Communication  Towers and Migratory Bird Routes


Hello,


I am a planner with Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency and I'm  
researching migratory bird (or otherwise) regulatory requirements and/or  
recommended practices for proposed and existing towers.


Can anyone recommend a definitive guide for NYS?


Thanks.
--
Cayugabirds-L  List Info:
Welcome and  Basics
Rules and  Information
Subscribe,  Configuration and Leave
Archives:
The Mail  Archive
Surfbirds
BirdingOnThe.Net
Please submit your observations to eBird!
--
--
Cayugabirds-L List Info:
Welcome and Basics
Rules and Information
Subscribe, Configuration and Leave
Archives:
The Mail Archive
Surfbirds
BirdingOnThe.Net
Please submit your observations to eBird!
--
--

Cayugabirds-L List Info:
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/CayugabirdsWELCOME
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/CayugabirdsRULES
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/CayugabirdsSubscribeConfigurationLeave.htm

ARCHIVES:
1) http://www.mail-archive.com/cayugabirds-l@cornell.edu/maillist.html
2) http://www.surfbirds.com/birdingmail/Group/Cayugabirds
3) http://birdingonthe.net/mailinglists/CAYU.html

Please submit your observations to eBird:
http://ebird.org/content/ebird/

--

Re: [cayugabirds-l] Communication Towers and Migratory Bird Routes

2012-03-29 Thread geokloppel
I would think you should look at IBAs on a case-by-case basis, giving 
consideration to the cited reasons for each listing. Some IBAs are certainly in 
the inventory because they represent significant migration routes (for example, 
all of Cayuga Lake is a designated IBA). But other IBAs were listed for 
different reasons, and not primarily for their potential to concentrate 
migrating birds.

Geo Kloppel
Bowmaker  Restorer
227 Tupper Rd
Spencer NY 14883
607 564 7026

On Mar 29, 2012, at 10:51 AM, Lisa Welch welch_m_l...@yahoo.com wrote:

 Thanks Bill,
 
 Wouldn't this be true of other recognized migratory routes, wildlife 
 refugees, or IBA, etc, for example, Montezuma?
 
 From: Bill Evans wrev...@clarityconnect.com
 To: Lisa Welch welch_m_l...@yahoo.com; cayugabirds 
 cayugabirds-l@cornell.edu 
 Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 10:16 AM
 Subject: Re: [cayugabirds-l] Communication Towers and Migratory Bird Routes
 
 Lisa,
  
 Unlike for commercial wind energy, there are no specific NY guidelines for 
 minimizing avian impacts of communcations towers (i.e., nothing from NYDEC).
  
 The Federal guidelines put forth by the USFWS are pertinent for NY and can be 
 found at the following link: 
 http://www.fws.gov/habitatconservation/communicationtowers.html
  
 Generally, towers should be kept as far away from the shores of Lake Ontario 
 as possible, due to occasional large migratory bird concentrations there. 
 Towers located within ~3 miles of the shoreline should be free-standing (no 
 guy wires) and as short as possible. Towers should not be built near sources 
 of bright permanent light (sports stadiums, convenient stores, etc.), which 
 may lead to dense bird aggregations of disoriented birds on cloudy nights. 
 Towers should use flashing (not steady-burning) aviation obstruction lighting 
 if possible.
  
 Bill Evans
 www.towerkill.com
  
 - Original Message -
 From: Lisa Welch
 To: Cayugabirds-L@cornell.edu
 Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 9:39 AM
 Subject: [cayugabirds-l] Communication Towers and Migratory Bird Routes
 
 Hello,
 
 I am a planner with Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency and I'm 
 researching migratory bird (or otherwise) regulatory requirements and/or 
 recommended practices for proposed and existing towers.
 
 Can anyone recommend a definitive guide for NYS?
 
 Thanks.
 --
 Cayugabirds-L List Info:
 Welcome and Basics
 Rules and Information
 Subscribe, Configuration and Leave
 Archives:
 The Mail Archive
 Surfbirds
 BirdingOnThe.Net
 Please submit your observations to eBird!
 --
 --
 Cayugabirds-L List Info:
 Welcome and Basics
 Rules and Information
 Subscribe, Configuration and Leave
 Archives:
 The Mail Archive
 Surfbirds
 BirdingOnThe.Net
 Please submit your observations to eBird!
 --
 
 
 --
 Cayugabirds-L List Info:
 Welcome and Basics
 Rules and Information
 Subscribe, Configuration and Leave
 Archives:
 The Mail Archive
 Surfbirds
 BirdingOnThe.Net
 Please submit your observations to eBird!
 --


--

Cayugabirds-L List Info:
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/CayugabirdsWELCOME
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/CayugabirdsRULES
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/CayugabirdsSubscribeConfigurationLeave.htm

ARCHIVES:
1) http://www.mail-archive.com/cayugabirds-l@cornell.edu/maillist.html
2) http://www.surfbirds.com/birdingmail/Group/Cayugabirds
3) http://birdingonthe.net/mailinglists/CAYU.html

Please submit your observations to eBird:
http://ebird.org/content/ebird/

--

Re: [cayugabirds-l] Communication Towers and Migratory Bird Routes

2012-03-29 Thread Bill Evans
Lisa,

There are no other migratory concentration zones as well recognized in NY as 
shoreline regions. There are other geographic dynamics that cause migratory 
bird concentrations, such as long ridgelines (for migratory raptors especially) 
and box canyons (for night migrants especially) but there are no documented 
sites I am aware of for these other concentration dynamics in the 
Syracuse-Onondaga region.

The concentrations of waterfowl at Montezuma would not be considered actively 
migrating as much as staging (migratory birds taking a pit stop). The FCC has 
Environmental Assessment rules that may limit tower construction within MNWR 
boundaries but I think there is a gray area for building towers in proximity to 
such preserves. Ideally there should be a buffer zone for tower construction 
around NWRs (depending on tower height).  However, the scientific grounding for 
such a zone is scant and would be more a precautionary gesture.

From what I've seen, communications towers and wind farms are being built with 
little regard for many IBAs (e.g. new wind farm on Wolfe Island Ontario). It 
seems human infrastructure can trump previously recognized wildlife zones in 
many cases. A lot depends on public awareness/support for the IBA and the 
nature of the intrusion, for example whether it is a 200-ft cell tower or 
1000-ft TV tower.

So, to answer your question, yes it is true in some cases and it should ideally 
be true in many other cases.

Bill
  - Original Message - 
  From: Lisa Welch 
  To: Bill Evans ; cayugabirds 
  Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 10:51 AM
  Subject: Re: [cayugabirds-l] Communication Towers and Migratory Bird Routes


  Thanks Bill,


  Wouldn't this be true of other recognized migratory routes, wildlife 
refugees, or IBA, etc, for example, Montezuma?




--
  From: Bill Evans wrev...@clarityconnect.com
  To: Lisa Welch welch_m_l...@yahoo.com; cayugabirds 
cayugabirds-l@cornell.edu 
  Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 10:16 AM
  Subject: Re: [cayugabirds-l] Communication Towers and Migratory Bird Routes



  Lisa,

  Unlike for commercial wind energy, there are no specific NY guidelines for 
minimizing avian impacts of communcations towers (i.e., nothing from NYDEC).

  The Federal guidelines put forth by the USFWS are pertinent for NY and can be 
found at the following link: 
http://www.fws.gov/habitatconservation/communicationtowers.html

  Generally, towers should be kept as far away from the shores of Lake Ontario 
as possible, due to occasional large migratory bird concentrations there. 
Towers located within ~3 miles of the shoreline should be free-standing (no guy 
wires) and as short as possible. Towers should not be built near sources of 
bright permanent light (sports stadiums, convenient stores, etc.), which may 
lead to dense bird aggregations of disoriented birds on cloudy nights. Towers 
should use flashing (not steady-burning) aviation obstruction lighting if 
possible.

  Bill Evans
  www.towerkill.com

- Original Message - 
From: Lisa Welch 
To: Cayugabirds-L@cornell.edu 
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 9:39 AM
Subject: [cayugabirds-l] Communication Towers and Migratory Bird Routes


Hello,


I am a planner with Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency and I'm 
researching migratory bird (or otherwise) regulatory requirements and/or 
recommended practices for proposed and existing towers.


Can anyone recommend a definitive guide for NYS?


Thanks.
--
Cayugabirds-L List Info:
Welcome and Basics
Rules and Information
Subscribe, Configuration and Leave
Archives:
The Mail Archive
Surfbirds
BirdingOnThe.Net
Please submit your observations to eBird!
--
  --
  Cayugabirds-L List Info:
  Welcome and Basics
  Rules and Information
  Subscribe, Configuration and Leave
  Archives:
  The Mail Archive
  Surfbirds
  BirdingOnThe.Net
  Please submit your observations to eBird!
  --



  --
  Cayugabirds-L List Info:
  Welcome and Basics
  Rules and Information
  Subscribe, Configuration and Leave
  Archives:
  The Mail Archive
  Surfbirds
  BirdingOnThe.Net
  Please submit your observations to eBird!
  --
--

Cayugabirds-L List Info:
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/CayugabirdsWELCOME
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/CayugabirdsRULES
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/CayugabirdsSubscribeConfigurationLeave.htm

ARCHIVES:
1) http://www.mail-archive.com/cayugabirds-l@cornell.edu/maillist.html
2) http://www.surfbirds.com/birdingmail/Group/Cayugabirds
3) http://birdingonthe.net/mailinglists/CAYU.html

Please submit your observations to eBird:
http://ebird.org/content/ebird/

--