of Natural Resources
Cornell Lab of Ornithology
From: Sandy Podulka
Sent: January 5, 2013 8:51 AM
To: CAYUGABIRDS-L
Subject: Re:[cayugabirds-l] (Long comment) Exempt part of Cayuga Lake from
hunting diving ducks
This would be a great project for the CBC and John has made thoughtful,
thorough
I agree with John Confer and others. I think his arguments should be more clearly and succinctly stated in order to be clear to others and effective to those who make decisions. I'm not volunteering or attempting to do so here, just adding some observations.The number and variety of waterfowl
Hi all,
This discussion threatens to escalate quickly and I hesitate to weigh in
but here are a few comments for everyone to consider:
1. One of John Confer's main points is that making the direct connection
between hunting pressure on Cayuga Lake and overall waterfowl populations is
This would be a nice accomplishment that is long overdue. I’ve thought that the
“few individuals...greatly reducing the pleasure of many” angle should be
enough to produce such an exemption, but your approach of population analysis
and presenting a scientific case for the exemption might help
...@clarityconnect.com]
*Sent:* Saturday, January 05, 2013 8:52 AM
*To:* John Confer; CAYUGABIRDS-L
*Subject:* Re: [cayugabirds-l] (Long comment) Exempt part of Cayuga Lake
from hunting diving ducks
This would be a nice accomplishment that is long overdue. I’ve
thought that the “few
-72558715-3493...@list.cornell.edubounce-72558715-3493...@list.cornell.edu]
on behalf of Bill Evans
[mailto:wrev...@clarityconnect.comwrev...@clarityconnect.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2013 8:52 AM
To: John Confer; CAYUGABIRDS-L
Subject: Re: [cayugabirds-l] (Long comment)
Exempt part
