I can think of several network options that could work well:
- zeromq
- memcached
- riak
- redis
Perhaps we need a simple plugin API to make it easier to experiment
with different options here?
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Martin Pool wrote:
> Hi, Richard,
>
> The general thing of network-wid
miss 3107
called for link 208
preprocessor error 1
unsupported source language8
autoconf compile/link 11
no input file 4
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Joel Rosdahl wrote:
> On 2011-08-02 03:52, Chr
Hi Jonathan,
Can you try this revision and see if it works for you on windows?
https://github.com/catlee/ccache/commit/02151ca60e0740d8046d9778d5b6d8f2891beec4
Cheers,
Chris
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 4:00 AM, Jonathan Martens wrote:
> On 22-8-2011 5:33, Justin Lebar wrote:
>>
>> I'm confused; do
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 7:49 AM, Jonathan Martens wrote:
> This commit brakes compilation on windows with the following errror:
>
> gcc -g -O2 -Wall -W -o ccache.exe main.o ccache.o mdfour.o hash.o
> execute.o util.o args.o stats.o version.o cleanup.o snprintf.o unify.o
> manifest.o hashtable.
t; $ ./test; md5sum test.gcda; rm test.gcda
> hello world
> 1c14199a60b2e5b9e6f1e96360adc40c test.gcda
> $ ./test; md5sum test.gcda; rm test.gcda
> hello world
> 1c14199a60b2e5b9e6f1e96360adc40c test.gcda
>
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Chris AtLee wrote:
>> On Mo
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Justin Lebar wrote:
>> The .gcda files themselves aren't cached, their contents are used to
>> calculate the hash for a -fprofile-use run. So if the .o file doesn't
>> exist, and you have the same .gcda file, you get a cache hit.
>
> Ah, I see. What if the .o file
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Justin Lebar wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Chris AtLee wrote:
>> Any thoughts on if caching the .gcda files is useful? Maybe have
>> another environment variable that switches it on?
>
> What do you mean? These files aren't g
Any thoughts on if caching the .gcda files is useful? Maybe have
another environment variable that switches it on?
Other than that, are there any other concerns with the new code?
Cheers,
Chris
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Chris AtLee wrote:
> If you use the same .gcda files with -fprof
.
>
> -Justin
>
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Chris AtLee wrote:
>> Thanks again for all your feedback.
>>
>> My latest code on github should address all the comments so far:
>> https://github.com/catlee/ccache/compare/jrosdahl:master...catlee:profil
Thanks again for all your feedback.
My latest code on github should address all the comments so far:
https://github.com/catlee/ccache/compare/jrosdahl:master...catlee:profile
Keep the feedback coming!
Cheers,
Chris
___
ccache mailing list
ccache@lists.
I've pushed some changes up here that I hope addresses all the comments:
https://github.com/catlee/ccache/compare/jrosdahl:master...catlee:profile
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Chris AtLee wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Joel Rosdahl wrote:
>> Justin Lebar's
Hi,
I recently did some work to get ccache to support gcc's various
-fprofile-* options. In some local testing in works great.
I've got the code up on github right now:
https://github.com/catlee/ccache/compare/jrosdahl:master...catlee:profile
Does this approach look like it will work?
Cheers,
C
12 matches
Mail list logo