On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 6:15 PM, Bogdan Harjoc wrote:
> You are perhaps referring to the variable that gentoo's portage [1]
> accepts (and passes to ccache as an option).
it was my understanding that ccache respected this. didnt realize we
were hacking around the limitation in Gentoo by faking o
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 4:48 PM, Bogdan Harjoc wrote:
> Is the fact that the cache size limit is only configurable as a
> commandline option intentional ? There seem to be environment
> vars for virtually everything else but this.
use CCACHE_SIZE
-mike
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 18:27, wrote:
> ?> could we get a "ccache" product on https://bugzilla.samba.org/ ?
> ?> there's a long standing issue with .i files i reported a while ago ...
>
> yep, I think that will be part of the new revitalised ccache project :-)
>
> My apologies for being such a sl
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 17:56, wrote:
> I'm happy to announce that Joel Rosdahl will be taking over as the
> ccache maintainer.
>
> I've been far too slack with ccache maintainence lately, and I'm very
> happy with the quality of the work that Joel has been doing in his
> private branch. I think
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 7:22 PM, Francois Marier wrote:
> In fact if maintainers from other distros (Gentoo perhaps?) want to help
> out and share some of their changes, that'd be great.
we only have two:
http://sources.gentoo.org/dev-util/ccache/files/
-mike
ive been using ccache with my cross-compilers but i just came across a
situation where ccache is causing problems
$ cat test.i
typedef __blkcnt_t blkcnt_t;
$ bfin-uclinux-gcc -c test.i
bfin-uclinux-gcc: ??`: No such file or directory
bfin-uclinux-gcc: no input files
$ bfin-uclinux-gcc -c test.i --
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 17:10, Joel Rosdahl wrote:
> Lars Gustäbel's compression patch (which will be incorporated in ccache 3.0)
> enables compression by default, and if you don't want compression you have to
> set CCACHE_NOCOMPRESS. I'm still a bit undecided about whether defaulting to
> compressi
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 16:00, Joel Rosdahl wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 05:00:48 -0500 Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> make the default a ./configure option that defaults to off
>
> I would prefer not to make a build-time option of this, because then the
> documentation has say some
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 16:24, Joel Rosdahl wrote:
> On 2010-08-23 13:35, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
>> [...] Using mmap [on Mac/PPC] to load all the include files bypasses
>> the filesystem cache [...]
>
> Ouch. That surprises me. Thanks for telling!
>
> The reason I chose mmap() instead of read()
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 14:46, Wilson Snyder wrote:
> - $(shell (git describe --dirty 2>/dev/null || echo vunknown) \
> + $(shell (git describe --dirty 2>/dev/null || git describe 2>/dev/null ||
> echo vunknown) \
probably better to move the stderr outside of the subshell:
$(shell (g
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 23:17, xiaoxiao wrote:
> I've been using ccache recently, in order to decline the compilation
> time for a certain module. In this module, with the help of the greatest
> ccache, the time could be shorten to 5 mins from 40 mins without any
> modification. However, even if th
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 23:56, xiaoxiao wrote:
> 于 2011/3/15 11:33, Mike Frysinger 写道:
>> try switching to gold
>
> Sorry, but what do you mean?
please dont top post
get latest binutils and use `ld.gold` instead of just `ld`. there is
also some gcc flag to control which one is
On Thursday 12 April 2012 02:32:39 Jürgen Buchmüller wrote:
> here's a suggested patch for config.h.in and util.c to add a local
> implementation of strtok_r for systems that don't have it (e.g. mingw32
> plus libgw32c).
sounds like we should just integrate gnulib instead of open coding all of our
On Wednesday 04 July 2012 09:53:46 Max Horn wrote:
> Using ccache with clang tends to generate tons of warnings, which can range
> from simply being annoying, to causing autoconf failures. This is because
> ccache runs the compiler with "-E" on preprocessed input, but also passes
> -I, -isystem etc
On Tuesday 18 September 2012 08:44:29 Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> Clearly there are some technical challenges in doing this: we'd have to
> hash all the object files and libraries (a la direct mode), but those
> problems are surmountable, I think.
or just re-use build-id ...
> The linker does not use
On Tuesday 18 September 2012 17:07:53 Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> On 18/09/12 21:04, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Tuesday 18 September 2012 08:44:29 Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> >> Clearly there are some technical challenges in doing this: we'd have to
> >> hash all the
On Tuesday 06 November 2012 11:53:12 Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 6 November 2012 04:54, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> > While it is true that "/usr/bin/env bash" is more portable than
> > "/bin/bash", I also don't like it as much.
> >
> > If I run a "#!/bin/bash" script without bash installed I get:
> > /
On Monday 05 November 2012 12:55:10 Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> The test script fails with shells other than bash. At least dash
> doesn't work.
could you post the exact errors you see ? i see old style portable code in
there that could easily be modernized to recent POSIX and plenty of quoting
issu
On Saturday 10 November 2012 00:41:52 Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 10 November 2012 00:41, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > if the script is written in bash and is intended to be, then
> > /bin/bash is the correct answer.
>
> Absolutely false. /usr/local/bin or /opt/bin might be the corr
On Sunday 11 November 2012 06:31:14 Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 11 November 2012 00:46, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Saturday 10 November 2012 00:41:52 Eitan Adler wrote:
> >> On 10 November 2012 00:41, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> > if the script is written in ba
On Saturday 10 November 2012 05:08:40 Joel Rosdahl wrote:
> On 10 November 2012 06:45, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > i see old style portable code in there that could easily be modernized to
> > recent POSIX
>
> Please don't strive to do that. Solaris's /bin/sh isn&#
On Monday 12 November 2012 06:03:37 Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> Running "sh -x test.sh" shows that the gcc command producing the error:
>
> + CCACHE_DISABLE=1 gcc -c test1.c -o reference_test1.o -O -O
> gcc: error trying to exec 'cc1': execvp: No such file or directory
>
> I don't understand what's wr
This is created when you run `./configure -C`.
---
.gitignore | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 7bed498..cfadd23 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ ccache-*.tar.*
ccache.1
ccache.html
ccache.xml
+config.cache
config.h
con
us.
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger
---
Note: this patch is against ccache 3.1.9 and does not apply cleanly to
the latest master
ccache.c | 12 ++--
ccache.h | 2 +-
manifest.c | 2 +-
stats.c| 10 +-
util.c | 13 -
5 files changed, 25 insertions
On 02 Nov 2014 22:29, Joel Rosdahl wrote:
> Sounds like a good idea to me.
>
> The patch doesn't apply to latest maint either. Would you like to update
> the patch to latest maint and resend it, or would it be OK if I commit a
> variant based on your patch?
feel free to rebase it. it'll most lik
Since perl is used in just one place and can easily be replaced by a
little bit of shell, do so. This makes testing on limited systems
easier.
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger
---
INSTALL.txt | 1 -
test.sh | 2 +-
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/INSTALL.txt b
On 16 Aug 2015 13:39, Tom Lane wrote:
> $ grep extra_libs Makefile
> extra_libs = -lz
> ccache$(EXEEXT): $(ccache_objs) $(extra_libs)
> $(CC) $(all_cflags) -o $@ $(ccache_objs) $(all_ldflags) $(extra_libs)
> $(LIBS)
> test/main$(EXEEXT): $(base_objs) $(test_objs) $(extra_libs)
> $(
On 17 Aug 2015 21:06, Joel Rosdahl wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > [...] this fails to build for me on late-model OS X:
>
> Bummer. Here's my proposed fix:
> https://git.samba.org/?p=ccache.git;a=commitdiff;h=f74c76107933046309861680b741adc67ac2a34e.
> Perhaps you could try it out?
that might work,
On 17 Aug 2015 21:08, Joel Rosdahl wrote:
> Nadav Har'El wrote:
>
> > [...] Your patch makes ccache exit as soon as it gets the SIGINT - but the
> > child compiler might still be running for a while longer. This will usually
> > be fine, but I thought the user can be surprised if he sees ccache (
On 01 Dec 2015 21:59, Anders Björklund wrote:
> Pierre Tardy made a PR (https://github.com/jrosdahl/ccache/pull/30)
> to replace the filesystem ("fs") cache with memcached altogether.
>
> We have gone with a different approach, to use memcached only as a
> secondary cache - while preserving the pr
On 02 Dec 2015 20:16, Pierre Tardy wrote:
> > i don't think getting rid out of the fs makes sense, but having memcache
> > be available dynamically as an additional layer sounds fine.
>
> It does make a lot of sense for me as I have a high performance network,
> which is faster than local harddriv
On 23 May 2016 20:17, Joel Rosdahl wrote:
> Ever since Tridge handed over the project to me, the main ccache Git
> repository has been hosted on git.samba.org and bugs handled in
> bugzilla.samba.org. I also have kept an unofficial mirror on github.
>
> Since some time now, almost all activity reg
On 19 Jul 2016 18:17, Joel Rosdahl wrote:
> On 12 July 2016 at 12:03, Иван Вайгульт wrote:
> > In order to enable visual studio build I did full build replica using
> > cmake. [...]
> > Any feedback from you is desired.
>
> Thanks for working on this.
>
> After some thinking I'm positive to gett
33 matches
Mail list logo
