On 12 November 2012 06:03, Andrew Stubbs a...@codesourcery.com wrote:
Running sh -x test.sh shows that the gcc command producing the error:
+ CCACHE_DISABLE=1 gcc -c test1.c -o reference_test1.o -O -O
gcc: error trying to exec 'cc1': execvp: No such file or directory
I don't understand
On 12 November 2012 13:00, Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com wrote:
On 12 November 2012 06:03, Andrew Stubbs a...@codesourcery.com wrote:
Running sh -x test.sh shows that the gcc command producing the error:
+ CCACHE_DISABLE=1 gcc -c test1.c -o reference_test1.o -O -O
gcc: error trying to exec
On Sunday 11 November 2012 06:31:14 Eitan Adler wrote:
On 11 November 2012 00:46, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Saturday 10 November 2012 00:41:52 Eitan Adler wrote:
On 10 November 2012 00:41, Mike Frysinger wrote:
if the script is written in bash and is intended to be, then
On Saturday 10 November 2012 05:08:40 Joel Rosdahl wrote:
On 10 November 2012 06:45, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
i see old style portable code in there that could easily be modernized to
recent POSIX
Please don't strive to do that. Solaris's /bin/sh isn't POSIX.
autoconf
On Monday 12 November 2012 06:03:37 Andrew Stubbs wrote:
Running sh -x test.sh shows that the gcc command producing the error:
+ CCACHE_DISABLE=1 gcc -c test1.c -o reference_test1.o -O -O
gcc: error trying to exec 'cc1': execvp: No such file or directory
I don't understand what's wrong
On 12 November 2012 13:11, Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com wrote:
On 12 November 2012 13:04, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
yes, when people tell you forcing asinine behavior is wrong, you label them
trolls. i guess that's how you win arguments.
Claiming that systems without
On Mon, 2012-11-12 at 13:11 -0500, Eitan Adler wrote:
#!/bin/sh which is mandated to exist by POSIX
Actually, unless there's been a change, POSIX doesn't mandate that the
POSIX shell appear as /bin/sh.
Unfortunately, this means that systems are free to provide definitively
non-POSIX /bin/sh
On 11 November 2012 00:46, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Saturday 10 November 2012 00:41:52 Eitan Adler wrote:
On 10 November 2012 00:41, Mike Frysinger wrote:
if the script is written in bash and is intended to be, then
/bin/bash is the correct answer.
Absolutely false.
On Saturday 10 November 2012 00:41:52 Eitan Adler wrote:
On 10 November 2012 00:41, Mike Frysinger wrote:
if the script is written in bash and is intended to be, then
/bin/bash is the correct answer.
Absolutely false. /usr/local/bin or /opt/bin might be the correct location.
if you have a
On 10 November 2012 00:41, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
ironic considering you're espousing a change to support crap systems that
aren't relevant.
I won't comment on this.
if the script is written in bash and is intended to be, then
/bin/bash is the correct answer.
Absolutely
On Monday 05 November 2012 12:55:10 Andrew Stubbs wrote:
The test script fails with shells other than bash. At least dash
doesn't work.
could you post the exact errors you see ? i see old style portable code in
there that could easily be modernized to recent POSIX and plenty of quoting
On 06/11/12 16:53, Eitan Adler wrote:
Perhaps you should get a better version of env?
Perhaps I should! I'm running Ubuntu 12.10, so I'm surprised about that.
But even if I did there would be many others with the same issue.
The followup to this discussion indicates that /bin/sh seems to
On 5 November 2012 18:55, Andrew Stubbs a...@codesourcery.com wrote:
The test script fails with shells other than bash. At least dash
doesn't work.
test.sh is intended to work even on Solaris's /bin/sh, which is even more
restricted than dash. Current test.sh on master and maint works well
On 05/11/12 17:58, Eitan Adler wrote:
-#!/bin/sh
+#!/bin/bash
This line is buggy:
please http://blog.eitanadler.com/2012/10/binbash-considered-harmful.html
for why.
I ideally the non-portable bashims get fixed but if not the shebang
line must be /usr/bin/env bash not /bin/bash.
While it is
On 05/11/12 22:35, g@free.fr wrote:
ccache-3.1.8 'make check' work with dash, no?
There's no problem with configure or make, only with test.sh.
Andrew
___
ccache mailing list
ccache@lists.samba.org
On 06/11/12 10:05, g@free.fr wrote:
On my debian stable machine (x86 32 bits), I set sh as a symlink to dash and
changed my script to emit SHELL='/bin/dash'
test is ok with 3.1.8 (ccache is statically linked to glibc in my
configuration).
I looked with checkbashims on test.sh git version
On 6 November 2012 04:54, Andrew Stubbs a...@codesourcery.com wrote:
While it is true that /usr/bin/env bash is more portable than /bin/bash,
I also don't like it as much.
If I run a #!/bin/bash script without bash installed I get:
/bin/bash: bad interpreter: No such file or directory
The test script fails with shells other than bash. At least dash
doesn't work.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Stubbs a...@codesourcery.com
---
test.sh |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/test.sh b/test.sh
index 4c78617..a334f62 100755
--- a/test.sh
+++ b/test.sh
@@
- Mail original -
De: Andrew Stubbs a...@codesourcery.com
À: ccache@lists.samba.org
Envoyé: Lundi 5 Novembre 2012 18:55:10
Objet: [ccache] [PATCH] Use bash for test.sh.
The test script fails with shells other than bash. At least dash
doesn't work.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Stubbs
19 matches
Mail list logo
