On 2010-11-10 23:54, Paul Smith wrote:
> [...]
So, my question is, is the NAME of the compiler part of the hash as well
as the mtime/size, so that ccache won't consider the second one to be a
copy of the first?
Yes, the compiler name is included in the hash. As you note, this is not
clear from
On 2010-11-11 00:56, Christopher Tate wrote:
I don't want to rain on peoples' parade here, because ccache is a
great product that has real benefits, but I do want to share some of
our findings regarding the use of ccache in our very large product
> [...]
Many thanks for sharing your findings! I
On 2010-11-11 00:56, Christopher Tate wrote:
> [...]
> The issue is around VM/file system buffer cache management. If you're
> using ccache, then you'll effectively be doubling the number of .o
> files that are paged into memory during the course of a build.
> [...]
By the way, have you tried set
