[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Calling Party Information Question

2011-06-01 Thread Vinay Kumar6
Hello, Is it possible to display one calling party number (say 111) on the IP Phone when ringing and display another calling party number (say 9111) same phone in directory(missed or received call). The call is from PSTN. I have tried using adding prefix in the gateway but it displays

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Call Preservation Issue

2011-06-01 Thread Miron Kobelski
Hi, Check following commands: gateway timer rtp/rtcp It might be disconnected because rtcp is dropped. Though i'm not sure it will help. Let us know Regards Kobel On Jun 1, 2011 2:52 AM, CCIE VOICE ccievoicelab.c...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Amit but unfortunately this will not work. As I

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] cbarge softkey display on phone

2011-06-01 Thread Rahul Kapor
Hello Adil, thanks for reply. this works as expected ! when u want to see softkey then option should be set to none. thx, Rahul On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Adil Shaikh adil.sha...@gmail.com wrote: you wrote Single button barge should be set to Cbarge this allows you to barge using

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Calling Party Information Question

2011-06-01 Thread Ki Wi
Use calling number transformation Sent from my iPhone Pls pardon my fat fingers. On Jun 1, 2011, at 2:30 PM, Vinay Kumar6 vinayjaisw...@in.ibm.com wrote: Hello, Is it possible to display one calling party number (say 111) on the IP Phone when ringing and display another calling party

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Calling Party Information Question

2011-06-01 Thread Vinay Kumar6
please disregard, managed to figure it out. Warm Regards, Vinay Kumar From: Vinay Kumar6/India/IBM@IBMIN To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Date: 06/01/2011 12:53 PM Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Calling Party Information Question Hello, Is it possible to display one calling party

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] AIM-CUE CF card problem

2011-06-01 Thread Alex Goh
Hi Rab, Thanks for the info, I wish it is good omen too : D Hi Sam, Thanks, but I guess it might not work, and the card reader can't even detected the card, i guess the CF was toasted :( Anyway look like I've no choice but get it off from ebay, as I don't have extra time to search the Sandisk

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Mobility softkey to send call to cell phone

2011-06-01 Thread adam compton
So I have mobility configured, SNR is working fine and dandy. If I make a call and press mobility softkey to send the call to my cell phone, What CSS does it use? Does is follow phone css or remote dest profile CSS? If it follows the device CSS, I could make sure that the SNR number is in a

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] frame-relay traffic-shaping on the test

2011-06-01 Thread adam compton
So I have a question as it pertains to the test. If I use auto qos on the Serial interfaces of the HQ and SiteB routers, frame-relay traffic shaping will be enabled. I know it will use the bandwidth that you configure for shaping. I also understand on the HQ router, the link to SiteC would

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] MWI and CUE

2011-06-01 Thread CCIE for Me
This may be a question to ask the proctor but I thought I would throw it out there. If we are asked to set up CUE and are provided MWI on/off numbers do we have to use them? Personally, I almost always use MWI unsolicited because it is one less thing to worry about. Could they possibly be

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Mobility softkey to send call to cell phone

2011-06-01 Thread Moataz Mamdouh
Hi It will use the re route css assigned to the RD profile , For me I used to create a separate route pattern for mobility. Best Regards , Moataz Mamdouh Tolba CCIE # 26129 (Voice) -Original Message- From: adam compton com...@gmail.com Sender: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Mobility softkey to send call to cell phone

2011-06-01 Thread Cristobal Priego
It will use the Rdo. Css to be moré specific It will use the re-routing css Enviado desde mi iPhone El Jun 1, 2011, a las 6:18, adam compton com...@gmail.com escribió: So I have mobility configured, SNR is working fine and dandy. If I make a call and press mobility softkey to send the call

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Mobility softkey to send call to cell phone

2011-06-01 Thread Cristobal Priego
I usually create a route pttrn for snr Enviado desde mi iPhone El Jun 1, 2011, a las 6:18, adam compton com...@gmail.com escribió: So I have mobility configured, SNR is working fine and dandy. If I make a call and press mobility softkey to send the call to my cell phone, What CSS does it

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MWI and CUE

2011-06-01 Thread Hough, Earl
If you are being asked to use MWI on/off numbers, then that implies you are setting up MWI using outdial. If you were to set it up using unsolicited and not use the outdial numbers, you would in all likelihood lose points. For each of the VM products there are several different integration

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 or 3560

2011-06-01 Thread josh west
I need a switch for my lab and ideally would like to have a 3750 but from what I am reading the 3560 is very similar for what is needed on the voice lab. Can anyone confirm this or tell me what a 3750 has that the 3560 does not. Thanks in advanced. ___

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] frame-relay traffic-shaping on the test

2011-06-01 Thread Roger Carpio
If you're not been provided with a value to Site C; then 1544 is acceptable. That's the one I use. On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:23 AM, adam compton com...@gmail.com wrote: So I have a question as it pertains to the test. If I use auto qos on the Serial interfaces of the HQ and SiteB routers,

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 or 3560

2011-06-01 Thread adam compton
Stacking. That's about it On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 11:08 AM, josh west west32...@gmail.com wrote: I need a switch for my lab and ideally would like to have a 3750 but from what I am reading the 3560 is very similar for what is needed on the voice lab. Can anyone confirm this or tell me what a

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 or 3560

2011-06-01 Thread Cristobal Priego
i have a 3560 and i notice a difference yesterday on the QoS if you run auto QoS on the 3560 it will not configure the service policy on the port and it will not configure the priority-queue out by default this is the auto qos config output from a 3750 the highlighted items will not be

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] frame-relay traffic-shaping on the test

2011-06-01 Thread Friderich Claude
Hello, Bandwith should always be specified between HQ and branch offices. In fact, if nothing is specified for qos config on 1 site, 56K is gonna be the default value, you are right Just create, in this case, a map-class with the right BW value specified in the question and apply this map-class

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 or 3560

2011-06-01 Thread Mehmet Turunc
Stacking and faster processor that you will NOT use in the lab :) /MT From: josh west [mailto:west32...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 06:08 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 or 3560 I need a switch for my lab and

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] ISDN bchan selection

2011-06-01 Thread Randall Crumm
Just to make sure top down mean channel 23 to 1 do I would configure isdn bchan descending Thanks, randall___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] frame-relay traffic-shaping on the test

2011-06-01 Thread adam compton
The problem with that is that Frame-relay traffic shaping is enabled for the entire interface, not just the sub-interface. If you don't have a Map assigned, it defaults to 56K On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Friderich Claude cfrider...@netcore.luwrote: Hello, Bandwith should always be

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 or 3560

2011-06-01 Thread adam compton
I get those commands on my 3560. are you running advanced ip services on the 3560? On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Cristobal Priego cristobalpri...@gmail.com wrote: i have a 3560 and i notice a difference yesterday on the QoS if you run auto QoS on the 3560 it will not configure the

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 or 3560

2011-06-01 Thread Cristobal Priego
yes, i did an ios upgrade before i started my journey and i was playing with qos and was looking for the policy map and i couldn't find it i need to check the ios, i'm not home now 2011/6/1 adam compton com...@gmail.com I get those commands on my 3560. are you running advanced ip services on

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 or 3560

2011-06-01 Thread adam compton
Correction. I am running ip services: c3560-ipservicesk9-mz.122-55.SE.bin On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Cristobal Priego cristobalpri...@gmail.comwrote: yes, i did an ios upgrade before i started my journey and i was playing with qos and was looking for the policy map and i couldn't find

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ISDN bchan selection

2011-06-01 Thread Cristobal Priego
You can configure the router to select the first available B channel in ascending order (channel B1) or descending order (channel B23 ). By default, the router will select outgoing calls in descending order. 2011/6/1 Randall Crumm rrcr...@yahoo.com Just to make sure top down mean channel 23 to

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ISDN bchan selection

2011-06-01 Thread None Ya
Top Down = Assigned starting at channel 1 and working through the high end (23 on a T1 PRI) Bottom Up = Assigned starting at channel 23 (T1 PRI) and working through to the low end If the PSTN is using Top Down (validated by running debug isdn q931 and noting the channel assigned when calling

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Test

2011-06-01 Thread Thomas Koch
Test… Having issues with the OSL. Sorry guys for the spam Thomas Koch Owner/Consultant CCDA, CCNA, CCNP Voice Cisco IPT Design Specalist Digitones, LLC Cell: +1.630.235.4309 E-mail: mailto:digito...@comcast.net digito...@comcast.net From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ISDN bchan selection

2011-06-01 Thread Steve Denney (stdenney)
It helps me to visualize a ladder, with the rungs being the channels, and rung (channel) number 1 being at the top. Ascending and descending refer to *numerically* ascending or descending - so ascending numerically (from channel 1 to channel N) means going top down on the ladder. Likewise,

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 or 3560

2011-06-01 Thread Michael Miller
I believe that ip services and advanced services have merged into one image. 122-55 is the latest as far as I know... Thanks, Mike On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:29 PM, adam compton com...@gmail.com wrote: Correction. I am running ip services: c3560-ipservicesk9-mz.122-55.SE.bin On Wed, Jun

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Trunk v/s access on the 4 port Hwics

2011-06-01 Thread Alan Gardner
Hi Everyone, Trunk v/s access on the 4 port Hwics I have always been told that you need to use Trunk mode. I have tried this several times in access mode in production without a hitch. Can someone fill me in on why you have to use trunk!! Best Regards, Alan Gardner

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Trunk v/s access on the 4 port Hwics

2011-06-01 Thread Bill Lake
My understanding is that access mode is unstable and not reliable on HWICs I also know that on older HWICS the access mode will not work. I have some and no matter how you do it, they will either only work for a short time or not at all. This seems to validate the unreliable thing. So on the

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ISDN bchan selection

2011-06-01 Thread Bill Lake
ascending is 1-23, just did this at a customer so I know that is right and confirmed with show isdn q931 descending is 23-1 as is the default. On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Steve Denney (stdenney) stden...@cisco.comwrote: It helps me to visualize a ladder, with the rungs being the

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP debugs

2011-06-01 Thread adam compton
What are the best MGCP debugs to run? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 or 3560

2011-06-01 Thread Bartosz Sokolowski
Hi, From the voice lab perspective both switches are exactly the same. It's NOT true that auto qos behaves differently. Auto qos may be IOS version/feature set dependent. I'm using c3560-advipservicesk9-mz.122-46.SE and don't have any problems described by others. -- Regards, Bartosz 2011/6/1

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ISDN bchan selection

2011-06-01 Thread Steve Denney (stdenney)
Whoops. I was doing fine up until that last cut and paste error. :) Bill's absolutely correct; that last line should have read Top down = *ascending* = channel 1 to 23. cheers, sd From: Bill Lake [mailto:whl...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 4:34 PM To: Steve Denney

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP debugs

2011-06-01 Thread George Goglidze
Debug MGCP packets is all you need... Great tool to see all messages between call agent and the gw. Sent from my iPad On 1 Jun 2011, at 21:52, adam compton com...@gmail.com wrote: What are the best MGCP debugs to run? ___ For more information

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ISDN bchan selection

2011-06-01 Thread Randall Crumm
Thanks!!! From: Steve Denney (stdenney) stden...@cisco.com To: Bill Lake whl...@gmail.com Cc: Cristobal Priego cristobalpri...@gmail.com; Randall Crumm rrcr...@yahoo.com; Online Study ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2011 2:18 PM

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Mobility softkey to send call to cell phone

2011-06-01 Thread Adil Shaikh
Hi Adam, As other wrote, it uses Rerouting CSS. In rerouting CSS (css-snr) include only one partition (pt-snr). Ensure that the pattern you create to reroute the call should be the same as the one define as RDP number. Make sure that you use route list which contains only Local GW to route the

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP on the lab

2011-06-01 Thread adam compton
When I took the test last time I used the clock timezone command and the ntp server command to setup ntp. I did not get points for this question. If the question on the Lab doesn't say anything about clock summertime, should we throw the command in anyway on the routers? I know clock summertime

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN QoS

2011-06-01 Thread Adil Shaikh
i think, you should use the highest available auto configured threshold for that queue. -adil On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Cristobal Priego cristobalpri...@gmail.com wrote: hello all, I have a question for you guys hopefully you can help me understand, this is way too confusing for

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE ip unnumbered

2011-06-01 Thread adam compton
I've got a weird requirement for configuring a CUE module. Normally you use ip unnumber interface, configure IP and your done. I have a loopback at 10.10.240.1 255.255.255.255 mask. I need to configure the CUE ip address as 10.10.240.2. Is it possible to configure this without changing the

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Called party transformation mask vs. route pattern/route list manipulation

2011-06-01 Thread adam compton
The list is probably tired of hearing from me tonight :) So when should you choose Called party transformation mask over route pattern/route list manipulation. I ran into a question with Device mobility that required called party transformation, but I can't identify any other scenarios where i

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP on the lab

2011-06-01 Thread adam compton
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 9:43 PM, adam compton com...@gmail.com wrote: I had bad luck asking the proctor last time around. I told them I interpret wording that SCCP is used for registration and he just blew me off with whatever it says. i watch ipexpert and they say ask the proctor ask the

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab answer

2011-06-01 Thread Ki Wi
Do you do what stated or do more? Let's say if they ask you to set ntp on all routers and callmanager. Do I need to set it on presence, unity and other component? For timezone in mailbox, is it necessary to make it right for all sites? (normally I will else it sounds irritating to have wrong

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN QoS

2011-06-01 Thread Sam Park
If they are asking to move Queues, then I don't think it matters. I would use the same threshold as the current queue. So for your example move 2 and 4 to queue 4 threshold 3. Don't forget to do the DSCP values to match. Sam. On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Adil Shaikh adil.sha...@gmail.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Called party transformation mask vs. route pattern/route list manipulation

2011-06-01 Thread Adil Shaikh
Called party transformation mask are done for gateway. I would use when there is plus (+) dial routpatterns. if the question says that you can not manipulate called party number on route list or route pattern. -adil On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 11:31 AM, adam compton com...@gmail.com wrote: The

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP on the lab

2011-06-01 Thread Randall Crumm
I haven't taken the lab yet but I would agree and only think the proctor can help if you are having a HW issue, informix Database issue or something like that rc  From: adam compton com...@gmail.com To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE ip unnumbered

2011-06-01 Thread Sam Park
Adam; Been playing around with this one. because of Mauro message on the 19th. I think I got it. (JUST NOW) You might be familiar with IPExpert's setup. Loopback addresses are all /32 Instead of using ip unnumber command to try to stick it to the Loop 0 (which will never work b/c of /32) you

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE ip unnumbered

2011-06-01 Thread adam compton
Interesting. I would think you would have to use a /30 subnet mask, but your theory sounds good. I'm trying tomorrow. Thanks! Adam On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Sam Park upperlevelpark...@gmail.comwrote: Adam; Been playing around with this one. because of Mauro message on the 19th.