Hi all,
I have configured MVA hairpin on BR1 router which is an MGCP gateway.
If the call is made to MVA route-pattern number [1999] from BR1 phone then i
hear Welcome to Cisco Unfiied Communications
If i call to MVA route-pattern number [1999] from HQ phone or PSTN phone
then i do not hear
Forgot to add that HQ and BR1 phones are sccp.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Adil Shaikh adil.sha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I have configured MVA hairpin on BR1 router which is an MGCP gateway.
If the call is made to MVA route-pattern number [1999] from BR1 phone then
i hear Welcome to
Show us the CUE module sip subsystem configuration...
Sent from my iPad
On 15 Jun 2011, at 06:30, shelesh shel...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have CME 7 and this gateway work as H323, and I have configure CUE, CUE is
working fine, but I am not getting MWI on phone., please find my
Hi Everyone,
Thanks for all the advice, I think I am confident enough of the
models/softphones to use.
I am going for a mix bag or IP Blue, 7945 and IP Communicator and May be
X-Lite Eyebeam if required.
Thanks,
Radhesh
From: Peterson, Ryan [mailto:ryan.peter...@pcmall.com]
Yeap just to add something to ur bucket use latest CIPC 8.6 it
supports + dialing as well.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Radhesh Naik radheshn...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Everyone,
Thanks for all the advice, I think I am confident enough of the
models/softphones to use.
I am going for a
Hi,
I need your help urgent help regarding translation rule pattern.
Telco sending 3 digit on voice gateway = xxx
And My IP Phone Extension are : 7xxx
I have MGCP GW and CUCM 6.1.5
Now what I should create as translation rule and dial peer for incoming
calls, I am able to do out
Thanks Ravindra.
-Original Message-
From: Ravindra Lakpriya [mailto:lakpr...@gmail.com]
Sent: 15 June, 2011 9:26 AM
To: Radhesh Naik
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; Jeff S
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Remote Phone Models
Yeap just to add something to ur bucket use latest CIPC 8.6
You can't use a translation rule or dial peer with mgcp.add 7 to the
prefix field on the mgcp gateway under the css or create a translation pattern
of xxx and prefix a 7. Add the the translation pattern to its own partition
and add that partition as the first one in the css on the gateway.
Which part of the world this telco is who is sending 3 digits?
-adil
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 7:36 PM, shelesh shel...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I need your help urgent help regarding translation rule pattern.
Telco sending 3 digit on voice gateway = xxx
And My IP Phone Extension are :
Voice translation-rule /.*\(...\)$/ /7\1/
Voice translation-profile IN
Translate called 1
Voice-port 0/0/0:23
Translation profile incoming IN
--Original Message--
From: shelesh
To: cciefo...@hotmail.com
To: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Cc:
Country Name is Kuwait, in Middle east.
From: Adil Shaikh [mailto:adil.sha...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 1:14 PM
To: shelesh
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; sheles...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] help regarding translation rule pattern.
Which part of the
Hi Shelash,
The easiest for you would be to prefix 7 to the called number.
On Call Manager, go to MGCP Gateway configuration, then on Endpoint
configuration page, in section: Call Routing Information - Inbound Calls**
There's an option to Prefix DN: and put 7 there.
You will have to reset the
LOL
Fine, then I guess your router is SRST as well?
You can try this:
voice translation-rule 1
rule 1 /^...$/ /7/
voice translation-profile PSTN-IN
translate called 1
voice-port 0/0/0:23!this has to be your D channel, if you're in
europe it will be 15.
translation-profile incoming
Hi,
May i know where is your outbound dp for mva#1999?
What is the purpose of 1998 ?
TIA
Shingei
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Adil Shaikh adil.sha...@gmail.com wrote:
Forgot to add that HQ and BR1 phones are sccp.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Adil Shaikh
hi ShinGei,
The MVA number is 1998.
Rather than using same number for the inbound to application service mva and
outbound to MVA number, two seperate numbers are used.
So, inbound dialpeer to application service mva is 1999 and after
hairpinning on Gateway the outbound number is 1998 which is
MVA IVR support G.711 only. If inter-region codec was set to G.729, you
need transcoder.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 1:21 AM, Adil Shaikh adil.sha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I have configured MVA hairpin on BR1 router which is an MGCP gateway.
If the call is made to MVA route-pattern number
hi michael,
since, i sent email, i have configured transcoder on both HQ and BR1
gateways and assigned them to MRG-MRGL-and Device Pool. REset all devices.
Still the same issue, call coming from PSTN into BR1 and call from HQ to MVA
application running on BR1 gateway gets dropped.
Call from BR1
hi Adil,
Apologize for the questions, because never try your setup before.
How do you translate the mgcp incoming 1999 to 1998? Do you have any
translation?
If not, how are you going to match the DNIS#
My understanding was:
PSTN IN -- mgcp gw -- route pattern -- h323 gw -- match incoming mva#
Great solutions but has anyone asked if the telco can send 4 digits? Or is
the 4 digit different and that is why 3 are sent?
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 5:52 AM, George Goglidze gogli...@gmail.com wrote:
LOL
Fine, then I guess your router is SRST as well?
You can try this:
voice
Hi SinGei,
I do not have translation pattern in CM. You call flow is aboslutely
correct. Just for clarity. I am adding few things in your call flow as
below:
PSTN IN [4158881999]-- mgcp gw [4digit]-- route pattern[1999] -- h323 gw
-- match incoming [1999] (service mva configure) dp {here service
So Raj;
Just call the telco and say...
I demand the full E164. By golly, I deserve all my digits. I'm paying for
my DID's.
And don't forget to send the + sign, too.
No prepending, for me, on my MGCP Gateway - I'll have you know.
If I don't see those digits in my ISDN q931 messages, I'll have to
Adil;
For testing, create a G711-region only device pool and put your H323 gw in
that DP. So all devices even PSTN should be able to make the call.
If not than, there might be some other config error.
Start from there to see where it's failing. I got through testing yesterday
but reset my rack.
The map-class is the workaround and as far as I know the bandwidth command
wont work.
Regards,
Roger Carpio.
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Bill Lake whl...@gmail.com wrote:
I think if you set the bandwidth to greater than 768 you will not have this
applied to the interface for BR2
On
Hi Sam,
The known good config is what Cisco suggests in their SRND, and they
suggest to have two different numbers:
Here's a snippet from SRND:
*Note *When deploying Mobile Voice Access in hairpinning mode, Cisco
recommends configuring the Mobile Voice Access DID at the PSTN gateway and
the
Hi Adil,
Do the following:
On CUCM, on RP 1999 - translate to 1998, so that when h323 setup is sent,
it's already 1998.
Also make sure the call between MGCP GW Region and h323 GW Region supports
g711.
And on h323 gateway you can have just one dial-peer:
!
dial-peer voice 1998 voip
Can anyone give suggestion on how to meet the requirement of Phones should
work same as it is registered with CUCM?
It's a very broad topic since there are so many features on CUCM.
Here's what I can think of:
1) Basic call routing (phone to phone, intra and inter sites, PSTN calls)
both
George;
Thanks for post. I've actually not read the SRND on MVA (haven't got to it
yet)
I think you are talking about SRND best practice not a known good.
I've been practicing IPX method for the Lab. Same number in and out and
back in, works everytime. Sure, it's not best practice but if
Hi Sam,
I do agree both will work, there's no reason why one would work and not the
other.
But in my opinion having two different numbers, makes the task easier, as
you don't have to worry about Partitions and Calling Search Spaces as you
would with only one number, as MVA Number and RP with the
From my understanding, if you're doing hairpin on MVA, it would be easier to
troubleshoot with two different number.
1) DID number (e.g. 408-555-). This number is for PSTN user to access
MVA.
Let say the significant digit was 4 for incoming MGCP GW, that'll make the
incoming called number
application
service MVA http://192.168.1.230:8080/ccmivr/pages/IVRMainpage.vxml
voice translation-rule 2291
rule 1 /81579615/ /579615/
!!579615 is my actual REMOTE DESTINATION # ON Call Manager
!! had to change the real number to 575(555) because I have this configured
on a
George;
No disagreement here.
I will definitely try it.
Regards;
Sam
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 1:45 PM, George Goglidze gogli...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Sam,
I do agree both will work, there's no reason why one would work and not the
other.
But in my opinion having two different numbers, makes
Per SRND, I configured FRF.12 as below:
class-map match-any signal
match dscp cs3
match dscp af31
class-map match-any voice
match dscp ef
!
policy-map wan-edge
class voice
priority percent 33
class signal
bandwidth percent 5
class class-default
fair-queue
!
policy-map
Do you have frame-relay trafic-shaping on the physical serial
interface? (not the sub-interface)
Adam
Original Message--
From: Greg cnn...@gmail.com
Sent: Wed, Jun 15, 2011 3:11:00 Pm
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
CC:
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] how to verify
I cannot have it on interface since I have MQC class configured. The system
gave me an error if I tried to.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Adam Frankel (afrankel) afran...@cisco.com
wrote:
Do you have frame-relay trafic-shaping on the physical serial
interface? (not the sub-interface)
hi all,
thanks for your suggestion. i will try your suggestions when i do next lab
and will get back to you guys.
thanks
-adil
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 4:29 AM, Sam Park upperlevelpark...@gmail.comwrote:
George;
No disagreement here.
I will definitely try it.
Regards;
Sam
On Wed, Jun
If anyone is scheduled for voice lab attempt, let me know if interested
in studying.
Thanks,
Paul (#16842 RS/Sec)
===
Paul Dardinski - CCIE #16842 (RS Security)
CCVP, CCNP, CCDA,
Hi All,
Is there any gottcha for CUPC to see the presence of another phone when it
goes off hook?
I have done CUPS integration almost 6-7 times. Sometime the presence of
another phone going off hook is displayed on CUPC and sometime not.
If the CUPS integration is done today, then presence of
did i write hit and miss? sorry, it shoudl be read as hit or miss.
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Adil Shaikh adil.sha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Is there any gottcha for CUPC to see the presence of another phone when
it goes off hook?
I have done CUPS integration almost 6-7 times.
38 matches
Mail list logo
