Hi Shabeeb,
Thanks for the help.
Can you please let me know why Point no. 1 is invalid? Does it violate any of
the requirements?
Peter
On Sun, 17 Jul 2011 10:06:36 +0530 wrote
point number 2 should be enough..
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 7:18 AM, Peter wrote:
Hi,
Suppose there is some
I am running the cucm 7.02 pub and sub on vmware esxi 4.1 host (dual quad
core, 16 gb ram) and if I ping the server from the router (1000 pings at
1000 bytes) I loose 1 in every six packets repeatedly - ie 5 success, 1 loss
in a pattern. All the posts I can find about this are on the CDP duplex
No matter what I do I cannot get the MGCP gateway to show as registered in
CUCM 7.02. I think I have configured up the gateway in CUCM correctly. I
cut and paste the router name from the sh ccm-m and the card is configured
in slot 0 (aim-voice-30 (2 subunits) subunit 1 vwic-2mft-E1 0/0. After
Hi Steven,
This is a normal behavior. It is cause by some sort of DOS protection in place.
If you ping from windows, you won't see this symptom. Basically from Linux or
iOS, they fire ping much more rapidly than windows.
It happens on physical server as well.
Sent from my iPhone
Pls pardon
im not very sure, but try doing these -
a. restart the TFTP CUCM services
b. remove the ip domain name command. try without this..
c. erase the complete config of the router and try again.
cheers..
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 12:35 PM, steven moran smoran...@gmail.com wrote:
No matter what I
Hey,
It does not violate anything.. i like to keep it simple.. i mean, i dont
like too much partitions and css..
once these start increasing, (in future) troubleshooting any issue will be a
big headache..
Cheers mate..
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Peter peter.imman...@rediffmail.comwrote:
have you got it registers with the CCM before on any of your VM spanshots ?
i faced this issue before and it only fixed when i have reverted the
ccm snapshot to older one
Thanks
Ash
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 11:35 AM, steven moran smoran...@gmail.com wrote:
No matter what I do I cannot get
It appears you have it configured correctly,
Try the following,
no mgcp
no mgcp bind control source-interface loopback 0
no mgcp bind media source-interface loopback 0
bounce MGCP on CUCM then activate on router
mgcp
once it registers, then add back your
mgcp bind control source-interface
i dont perticularly remember doing this on VM.. but yes i think i have.
im sorry, i dint understand what you eant by the ccm snapshots
could you clarify..
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Ashraf Ayyash ash.ayy...@gmail.com wrote:
have you got it registers with the CCM before on any of your VM
The only reasons for MGCP to not register with the CUCM are -
a. Hostname mismatch
b. Domain Mismatch
c. cucm in not binded to the serial interface..
regards
shabeeb
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Ashraf Ayyash ash.ayy...@gmail.com wrote:
have you got it registers with the CCM before on
Hi Guys,
Hope I can seek a little help here, I've encountered the MLP broke the WAN
link issue, which can't be resolved by any work around discussed before.
What happened is I'm trying to configured an MLP for HQ and BR1 with auto
qos and also manually, but both landed me on broken WAN where
Hi Guys,
Managed to resolve the issue. is my OSPF config causing it, as I notice
pinging the VT IP on both router is success.
Regard,
Alex
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Alex Goh ncsalex@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Guys,
Hope I can seek a little help here, I've encountered the MLP broke the
Hello All ,
if you look at the show ccm-m included in the first emai , you will
see the GW registered which mean we have no problem at all with
domian-name or any other config ,
what i mean of revert back the VM snapshot , in the ESX we usually
take snap shot of the CCM each time we configure
Hi - your br1-rtr domain name (smilab.com) doesn't look to match your
sdi traces (lab.com) - check replication and try restarting ccm on
both nodes.
hth
On 17/07/2011, steven moran smoran...@gmail.com wrote:
No matter what I do I cannot get the MGCP gateway to show as registered in
CUCM 7.02.
Or if the port is physically down... like not plugged in.
- Reply message -
From: Shabeeb Mohammed shabeebc...@gmail.com
Date: Sun, Jul 17, 2011 9:19 am
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Fwd: MGCP Gateway reg issue (not l2 TEI or l3 bind)
To: Ashraf Ayyash ash.ayy...@gmail.com
Cc:
Hi Steven,
As you're saying yourself, you have configured port 0/0 on a CUCM gateway
configuration: vwic-2mft-E1 0/0
and on the real router, you have port 0/1, hence it can't register.
Correct this, and you should be fine.
Cheers,
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 9:35 AM, steven moran
Hi Guys,
By any chance any have the latest CCIE Voice Techtorial from Cisco Live 2011
and willing to share?
Thanks,
Regards,
Alex
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
Are you a CCNP or
Try removing the bind mgcp commands.
Thanks,
Chevy
On Jul 17, 2011 4:42 AM, steven moran smoran...@gmail.com wrote:
No matter what I do I cannot get the MGCP gateway to show as registered in
CUCM 7.02. I think I have configured up the gateway in CUCM correctly. I
cut and paste the router name
Hi,
In the lab, suppose there is a general requirement like Subscriber should be
the primary call processing with Publisher as backup.
When you have a setup like HQ as CUCM and BR2 with CUCME, and Gatekeeper
between them. There is nothing specific mentioned in the Gatekeeper section,
related
Take a look at your domain name.
KP
On Jul 17, 2011, at 7:17 AM, Chevy chevy.man...@gmail.com wrote:
Try removing the bind mgcp commands.
Thanks,
Chevy
On Jul 17, 2011 4:42 AM, steven moran smoran...@gmail.com wrote:
No matter what I do I cannot get the MGCP gateway to show as
Hi,
MVA has been configured for BR1 which is a H.323 Gateway. Users are getting
authenticated and are able to make calls. But for the outgoing calls, calling
name is not getting displayed. Calling Party ID is going as per the
configuration. Only the calling name is not going to the PSTN
By default the priority for each CCM will be server and you can prioritize
them using command Gw-priority .
Vik have explain/configure this in each GK config example he have in WB2
Thanks
Ash
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Peter peter.imman...@rediffmail.comwrote:
Hi,
In the lab, suppose
you would use something like this to proritize the call processing
zone prefix US 1… gw-priority 10 gk-trunk_2
zone prefix US 1… gw-priority 9 gk-trunk_1
zone prefix US 5… gw-priority 10 gk-trunk_2
zone prefix US 5… gw-priority 9 gk-trunk_1
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Peter
Hi Ashraf,
Thanks for the response.
My question is, if there is no specific requirement in the Gatekeeper section
of the lab to have priority for Subscriber, are you supposed to do this
configuration using gw-priority command?
By doing, Are you going to lose any marks?
Peter
On Sun, 17 Jul
if the Questions ask to prioritize YES, i believe the Q will be clear enough
if they ask for this requirement in specific ,
if i am in the exam now and this is not specified clearly i will ask the
proctor and he must give me more accurate info about this :)
but General speaking they must tell you
anyone like to sell voucher , looking for 20 unit
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Um missed this,
BR1-RTR(config)#do sh ccm-m
MGCP Domain Name: BR1-RTR.smlab.com
your q931 shows
/ds...@br1-rtr.lab.com
change the name in CUCM to BR1-RTR.smlab.com, Cut and paste, cut and paste
.
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 7:52 AM, Bill Lake whl...@gmail.com wrote:
It appears you have it
Hi Peter - you can use the gw-priority 10 cucm-trunk_1 parameter
within the zone prefix command to ensure the publisher is always
selected first.
hth
On 17/07/2011, Peter peter.imman...@rediffmail.com wrote:
Hi,
In the lab, suppose there is a general requirement like Subscriber should be
the
Hello All ,
can we all try to make useful info from this Question because we all
might face this at the lab and there is no Alias in there to save us
:)
- can you please confirm this domain name matter for all of us , i
need to know if you have configured wrong domain name or it just stuck
in
Add display name to rdp and let me know if it helps
Sent from my iPad
On Jul 17, 2011, at 1:14 PM, Peter peter.imman...@rediffmail.com wrote:
Hi,
MVA has been configured for BR1 which is a H.323 Gateway. Users are getting
authenticated and are able to make calls. But for the outgoing
Hi,
You mean the Display Name for DN associated the RDP, right.
I have tried that already, no luck?
Peter
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 00:47:50 +0530 wrote
Add display name to rdp and let me know if it helps
Sent from my iPad
On Jul 17, 2011, at 1:14 PM, Peter wrote:
Hi,
MVA has been configured
Installing on ESXi
I have installed base MS Server 2003 from Cisco IPT OS Disk
Win SVr 2003 Teleco Svr App SW 3.0 1-4 CPU
Product Key : QW438-46P6G-MHXTB-99XGG-XX7CG
using as base OS for UCCX 7 install for CCIE-V home lab
Problem is when I try to activate the server key (microsoft) it will not
...
URL: /archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20110717/ee2b3288/attachment-0001.html
--
___
CCIE_Voice mailing list
CCIE_Voice@onlinestudylist.com
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
End of CCIE_Voice Digest
Ki,
thanks for the explantion as you can see from my other post regarding MGCP
gateway - I was wondering whether my registration problem was a connectivity
issue. I am following up on the suggestions on the mgcp post and will
update soon.
Best regards,
Steve
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 7:24 PM,
Hi Michael,
I had the same problem, try searching the web for W2K3 WA. Once you have
done this, make sure to get a snapshot of your clean installation so you
don't have to do it again in case you are practicing integration. I think
since validation can't validate your server; you still have to
It won't activate because the key is for OEM version. When you try to
activate an OEM version Windows, it'll try to retrieve vendor info from BIOS
(VM BIOS).
You should just install a regular Windows (retail or volume license) and
activate it. Then apply the registry hack to make it look like
Also take note of the UC on UCS docwiki:
After upgrading the ESXi host to 4.1 and upgrading VMs to VMwareTools
to 4.1, you may experience slow TCP performance on VMs running on the
4.1 ESXi host. You can address this situation by disabling Large
Receive Offload (LRO) on the ESXi host.
CUCM does not support fractional PRIs in MGCP officially.
- Reply message -
From: steven moran smoran...@gmail.com
Date: Sun, Jul 17, 2011 8:45 pm
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP Gateway reg issue (not l2 TEI or l3 bind)
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Dear all,
thanks for all of
http://vimeo.com/5970079
Michael Sears
CompuCom
US West, Professional Services
Senior IPT Engineer
Office:+1 720.344.6833
Mobile: +1 303.328.5590
Fax:+1 978.863.0740
Conf: +1 866-389-9494 #6159225 Host Code: 879 7896
E-Mail:
39 matches
Mail list logo
