Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAB (8) is worst lab

2013-04-28 Thread Kevin Ronc
ikizoo we already talking about lab (7) i think you forgot you are using cert you said and not good then i shared with you few questions On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 3:41 AM, jony jacob wrote: > I am practicing cvl i have all the questions from them and it's perfectly > accurate for lab -->8 > > I

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAB (8) is worst lab

2013-04-28 Thread Charlie Spencer
Ikizoo, I cannot paste full questions here and discuss re actively on emails if you are interested you can sure email me back Want to discuss proactive. thanks On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 4:53 AM, ikizoo hello wrote: > Kevin, > i saw your name a lot talking about new lab, if you want to disc

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] lab-2of workbook-1

2013-04-28 Thread Amit Sharma
dear experts, which phone will work for PSTN phone? How can register x-lite, blue and cipc from my system to lab devices as per lab question needs? -- Thanks & Regard's Amit Sharma ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab trainin

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUPS User is not authorized to access this page

2013-04-28 Thread Hesham Abdelkereem
Dear Experts, I'd like to add contacts to CUPC Client. However i go to https://CUPSSERVERIP/ccmuser I login with HQ2 and SB2 first it gives me hard time to login sometimes it logins right away sometimes gives me an error and then i go back its logined. The most important thing is when I am succes

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] phone association

2013-04-28 Thread ikizoo hello
Hi Allis there any easy way to associate a phone to user, i am doing it manually, and it takes a bit of time.-ikizoo ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.c

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAB (8) is worst lab

2013-04-28 Thread ikizoo hello
Kevin, i saw your name a lot talking about new lab, if you want to discus on any question / issue then post it, lot of experts here.dont just say "add me.."thing.- ikizoo. Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 03:55:44 +0530 From: roncke...@gmail.com To: otunola.aker...@gmail.com CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAB (8) is worst lab

2013-04-28 Thread Kevin Ronc
I think i was the first guy who might have got this lab i am sure for it when i saw i was totally shocked and could not able to do anything I am sure it's very usual if you don't practice those questions before going in lab you cannot clear the test and its the fact. taken ccie-voice-labs wor

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAB (8) is worst lab

2013-04-28 Thread jony jacob
I am practicing cvl i have all the questions from them and it's perfectly accurate for lab -->8>> I can see new update coming on 1st may hope we can crack the same like lab -->7>> My friend all cleared lab -->7>> last week and had back luck to me i got this new lab --->8>> let me know if you are

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAB (8) is worst lab

2013-04-28 Thread jony jacob
I am practicing cvl i have all the questions from them and it's perfectly accurate for lab -->8 I can see new update coming on 1st may hope we can crack the same like lab -->7 My friend all cleared lab 7 last week and had back luck to me i got this new lab --->8 let me know if you are interested

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAB (8) is worst lab

2013-04-28 Thread otunola . akerele
What cost re u sharing man?? Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone -Original Message- From: Charlie Spencer Sender: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 03:04:27 To: Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAB (8) is worst lab ___

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAB (8) is worst lab

2013-04-28 Thread Charlie Spencer
Hi GOT LAB (8) its really very very very very tuff lab I am surprised to see this lab was not expected now i have no choice to choose r-e-a-(l) labs have no money to give cisco all the time attempt attempt i am fedup now If anyone want to share the cost please email me back I am ready to share

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAB 8 VERY VERY TUFF

2013-04-28 Thread Charlie Spencer
Hi GOT LAB 8 its really very very very very tuff lab I am surprised to see this lab was not expected now i have no choice to choose r e a l labs have no money to give cisco all the time attempt attempt i am fedup now If anyone want to share the cost please email me back I am ready to share eve

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE signaling QOS on switch

2013-04-28 Thread CCIEing
Dears, So the above access list is correct ?? CUE signaling traffic only used this port ? 2748 Is there any document showed the used port for the CUE traffic ?? On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:46 AM, Jack Kamina wrote: > on one of the practice lab the need is to police the signaling packets to > a

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Buying home lab or Waiting for Cisco Live in June

2013-04-28 Thread Bill
If they announce a new version in June you will have about 6 months from then to pass your lab. My recommendation from there is if you have plenty of study/lab time then go for it. If you don't and have to squeeze it in then you might be better off waiting to see. My thought is that 600 to 1

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] lab-2a--workbook-1

2013-04-28 Thread Amit Sharma
Hello experts, i have some confusion... how can i register my system, cipc, x-lite and blue phone when using all labs for tests features...as doing now lab-2 then 3...4..5.till end... what phone would be pstn phone? please response as i am stuck here... -- Thanks & Regard's Amit Sharma _

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Buying home lab or Waiting for Cisco Live in June

2013-04-28 Thread Alex Mendoza
Did you know the official date for new version? I assume that I'll be ready for Sep/oct 2013 Best Regards AA Mendoza Sent from my iPhone  On 28/04/2013, at 10:33, Robert Thomas wrote: > Hi, > > I'm thinking on buying a home lab to start my studies. > It would run around 3K investment acc

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Buying home lab or Waiting for Cisco Live in June

2013-04-28 Thread Leslie Meade
Speaking of buying a lab I am selling mine.. I passed a few weeks ago and it is sitting idle at home.. Email me if you want to chat further.. Sent from my iPad On Apr 28, 2013, at 8:52 AM, "Robert Thomas" mailto:tho...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi, I'm thinking on buying a home lab to start my s

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Buying home lab or Waiting for Cisco Live in June

2013-04-28 Thread Robert Thomas
Hi, I'm thinking on buying a home lab to start my studies. It would run around 3K investment according to my amazon shopping list. However I'm thinking to wait for June and Cisco Live for announcement about the new version. I don't expect major changes on the setup, perhaps some new phone models

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SIP Delay Vs Early Offer

2013-04-28 Thread Suresh Bhandari
Thanks Robert. I missed that portion. On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 7:56 PM, Robert Thomas wrote: > The description is not entirely correct. > > Delayed Offer: The UAC SDP is relayed on the ACK Message > > INVITE -> > 100 Trying <- > 200OK <- With SDP > ACK -> With SDP > > Early Offer > > INVITE ->

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SIP Delay Vs Early Offer

2013-04-28 Thread Robert Thomas
The description is not entirely correct. Delayed Offer: The UAC SDP is relayed on the ACK Message INVITE -> 100 Trying <- 200OK <- With SDP ACK -> With SDP Early Offer INVITE -> With SDP 100 Trying <- 200OK <- With SDP ACK -> The SDP is moved from the ACK to the INVITE, This is why is Early

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE installation via boothelper

2013-04-28 Thread Bill
What language did you pick? Sent from my iPad On Apr 27, 2013, at 11:10 PM, Hesham Abdelkereem wrote: > Dear Experts, > > The current version of CUE is 2.1.3 something like that and I was trying to > install CUE 7.0.3 > However , I have downloaded all the package from CCO. > I have used the

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP Auto vs Manual configuration

2013-04-28 Thread Suresh Bhandari
I believe that when you configure fractional PRI from IOS, and if you have to expand the channels later, you have to reconfigure mgcp... that is you have to shut your voice port, controller, bind-l3 command in the D-channel etc On the other hand, if you have busy out the channels from the UCM,

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SIP Delay Vs Early Offer

2013-04-28 Thread CISCO CCIE VOICE
Thank you suresh i will check ths on my pod... On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Suresh Bhandari wrote: > Content Length 0 means, there will be an OK followed with SDP So > basically both are same. > > > On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 1:56 PM, CISCO CCIE VOICE > wrote: > >> Hi Suresh, Thanks for y

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP Auto vs Manual configuration

2013-04-28 Thread CISCO CCIE VOICE
What is the purpose of doing busy out channels from 7-23 if we are its not using Fractional PRI ,If we are busy out channel from 7-23 which means that we are using only 6 channels so its a fractional PRI line Please Experts correct us on ths... Thanks On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Suresh

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP Auto vs Manual configuration

2013-04-28 Thread Suresh Bhandari
If you are busying out the channels in CUCM using automatic mgcp configuration, it will not be Fractional PRI... Experts, please correct me if I am wrong! On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 2:01 PM, CISCO CCIE VOICE wrote: > HI Thanks Again, So i can use Fractional T1/E1 PRI with Automatic > MGCP Configura

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SIP Delay Vs Early Offer

2013-04-28 Thread Suresh Bhandari
Content Length 0 means, there will be an OK followed with SDP So basically both are same. On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 1:56 PM, CISCO CCIE VOICE wrote: > Hi Suresh, Thanks for you reply, If SIP 200 OK message has media then its > DELAYED OFFER and SIP INVITE Message with content-length 0 also mea

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP Auto vs Manual configuration

2013-04-28 Thread CISCO CCIE VOICE
HI Thanks Again, So i can use Fractional T1/E1 PRI with Automatic MGCP Configuration? On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Suresh Bhandari wrote: > Regarding your question about busyout channels in CUCM, you will use the > MGCP gateway address as appeared in your CUCM gateway page and busyout > cha

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SIP Delay Vs Early Offer

2013-04-28 Thread CISCO CCIE VOICE
Hi Suresh, Thanks for you reply, If SIP 200 OK message has media then its DELAYED OFFER and SIP INVITE Message with content-length 0 also means the DELAYED OFFER so which one i have to consider ? thanks On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Suresh Bhandari wrote: > If your SIP Invite message is co

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SIP Delay Vs Early Offer

2013-04-28 Thread Suresh Bhandari
If your SIP Invite message is containing media information, it is an early offer. If the response OK message has media, then it is delayed offer. I prefer checking "Content-Length" field to find out if its an Early or Delayed offer. Value of 0 mean Delayed offer, non-zero value means it is includi

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP Auto vs Manual configuration

2013-04-28 Thread Suresh Bhandari
Regarding your question about busyout channels in CUCM, you will use the MGCP gateway address as appeared in your CUCM gateway page and busyout channels using 1. You can find a good example by clicking the parameter. For your reference, for say your SA site, the SP "Change B-Channel Maintenance St

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] SIP Delay Vs Early Offer

2013-04-28 Thread CISCO CCIE VOICE
HI Experts, Which SIP Message contains Delay Offer and Early Offer message ? i i am bit confuse as some documents says SIP INVITE message contains both Delay and Early Offer and some documents say its SIP 200 OK message Thanks ___ For more information

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP Auto vs Manual configuration

2013-04-28 Thread Suresh Bhandari
For fractional PRI you should use manual method. On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 12:45 PM, CISCO CCIE VOICE wrote: > HI Thanks, > > but if suppose i want to use 6 channel from T1 PRI on HQ Router and 12 > channel of E1 PRI from Branch-2 router,so how can i busy out channels under > service parameter ?

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP Auto vs Manual configuration

2013-04-28 Thread Peter Simmons
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/voicesw/ps556/products_configuration_example09186a008076f8d2.shtml Old versions, but has everything you need. regards Peter On 4/28/2013 8:00 AM, CISCO CCIE VOICE wrote: HI Thanks, but if suppose i want to use 6 channel from T1 PRI on HQ Router and 12

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP Auto vs Manual configuration

2013-04-28 Thread CISCO CCIE VOICE
HI Thanks, but if suppose i want to use 6 channel from T1 PRI on HQ Router and 12 channel of E1 PRI from Branch-2 router,so how can i busy out channels under service parameter ? and how does CUCM knows about which router interface to busy out as i have two site with different fractional PRI Any

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP Auto vs Manual configuration

2013-04-28 Thread Mohamed Gazzaz
Pick up whatever method you are comfortable with and practice, practice. practice .. Try both methods and see which one is faster for you. Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 09:10:30 +0300 From: ccievoic...@gmail.com To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP Auto vs Manual conf