If I were trying to police MGCP signalling traffic from the HQ RTR would
it be best to classify my traffic based on AF31, as this is the default
signalling marking used by the gateway, or is there a better way? I dont
have the option of NBAR on a catalyst switch, so i think my only other
option
Please refer to the following great Posts, which will explain the SRR for
you:
http://blog.ine.com/2008/06/26/quick-notes-on-the-3560-egress-queuing/#more-141
http://blog.ine.com/2008/03/03/bridging-the-gap-between-3550-and-3560-qos-part-i/#more-84
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 7:31 AM, Randall Crumm
Thanks
I saw an example and now it makes sense. I knew it was simple but I just wanted
to make sure
Randall
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 28, 2011, at 12:42 AM, datucha123 datucha123 datucha...@gmail.com
wrote:
Please refer to the following great Posts, which will explain the SRR for you:
Hi,
Can someone explain the command, mls qos srr-queue input bandwidth 4 4: a
little and an example of having one queue with twice as much bandwidth as the
oterh queue (or something like that).
Thanks,
Randall___
For more information regarding
guys i have a question for your
my questions is in regards to the shared bandwidth i know it's measured as a
weight and whenever you have shape you ignore the value so
the q2 in this case the weight is indeed 10 / (10+60+20) = so Q2 has 1/9 of
the shared bandwidth right ?
and this is how the
Answer your 1st question, its 1/10th.
2nd question is correct.
duy
ccie #27737 voice
tmobile g2
On May 31, 2011 4:19 PM, Cristobal Priego cristobalpri...@gmail.com
wrote:
guys i have a question for your
my questions is in regards to the shared bandwidth i know it's measured as
a
weight and
thank you
2011/5/31 ccieid1ot ccieid...@gmail.com
Answer your 1st question, its 1/10th.
2nd question is correct.
duy
ccie #27737 voice
tmobile g2
On May 31, 2011 4:19 PM, Cristobal Priego cristobalpri...@gmail.com
wrote:
guys i have a question for your
my questions is in regards
R3(config)#class-map test
R3(config-cmap)#match dscp R3(config-cmap)#match dscp ?
0-63 Differentiated services codepoint value
af11 Match packets with AF11 dscp (001010)
af12 Match packets with AF12 dscp (001100)
af13 Match packets with AF13 dscp (001110)
af21 Match
AFxy = 8*x + 2*y
AF41 = 8*4 + 2*1 = DSCP 34
AF31 = 8*3 +2*1 = DSCP 26
best regards
kobel
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 05:28, Cristobal Priego
cristobalpri...@gmail.comwrote:
hello all
I have a quick question for you
how would you configure the outout queues so in case of congestion the
packets
thank you guys
that's the little formula that i needed
2011/5/22 Miron Kobelski findko...@gmail.com
AFxy = 8*x + 2*y
AF41 = 8*4 + 2*1 = DSCP 34
AF31 = 8*3 +2*1 = DSCP 26
best regards
kobel
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 05:28, Cristobal Priego cristobalpri...@gmail.com
wrote:
hello all
I
hello all
I have a quick question for you
how would you configure the outout queues so in case of congestion the
packets marked with AFXY once they go from AF41 for example, to AF42, AF43
when those packets are remarked how would you send them to a different queue
?
also what's the eassiest way
I'm sure a lot of you have seen this document, but I thought I would share
it to anyone who hasn't seen it:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps5023/products_tech_note09186a0080883f9e.shtml
This document has the best descriptions of all of the 3750 QOS features I
have seen.
-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Miron Kobelski
*Sent:* jeudi 27 janvier 2011 19:49
*To:* Roger Källberg
*Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
*Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 QoS: service-policy + mls qos trust
commands on the same port
Thanks Roger, I need to check
Hi Steve,
thanks for confirmation.
regards
kobel
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 23:05, Steve Denney (stdenney)
stden...@cisco.comwrote:
To answer your second question - the Enterprise QoS SRND is here:
Hi Matthew,
I agree about the cos part, adding that you can control the cos value for PC
connected to the phone using switchport priority extend command with 4
options:
* trust
* don't trust
* overwrite with specific cos value
* by default - overwrite with COS 0
But the question is, how DSCP
*Till:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
*Ämne:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 QoS: service-policy + mls qos trust
commands on the same port
Hello,
I'm working on Vol2 Lab8 QoS section. Task 5.2 requires to conditionally
trust DSCP markings from the Cisco IP phone, which can be accomplished
After refering to documentation:
*mls qos trust dscp*
Classify an ingress packet by using the packet DSCP value (most significant
6 bits of 8-bit service-type field). For a non-IP packet, the packet CoS is
used if the packet is tagged. For an untagged packet, the default port CoS
value is used.
Hey Roberto,
I haven't read the whole thread so I may be irrelevant here but if you want
to match RTP packets your access list 125 should be udp instead of tcp.
cheers.
Romain
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Roberto Reyes Alanis rre...@plannet.com.mx
wrote:
We need remember that we can use
Hello,
I'm working on Vol2 Lab8 QoS section. Task 5.2 requires to conditionally
trust DSCP markings from the Cisco IP phone, which can be accomplished with:
mls qos trust device cisco-phone
mls qos trust dscp
But 5.3 requires policing and remarking using service-policy for the same
switch port.
Correct me if I'm wrong, isn't trusting the ports setting the ingress and
service policy is setting on egress?
duy
ccie #27737 voice
tmobile g2
On Jan 26, 2011 1:21 PM, Miron Kobelski findko...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I'm working on Vol2 Lab8 QoS section. Task 5.2 requires to conditionally
On your other question, the qos srnd is placed on the desktop.
duy
ccie #27737 voice
tmobile g2
On Jan 26, 2011 1:32 PM, ccieid1ot ccieid...@gmail.com wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong, isn't trusting the ports setting the ingress and
service policy is setting on egress?
duy
ccie #27737 voice
I agree that QoS SRND should be available on desktop, but it bothers me that
I don't know how to find it on cisco.com...
On switch you configure service policy for ingress:
:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 QoS: service-policy + mls qos
trustcommands on the same port
Hello,
I'm working on Vol2 Lab8 QoS section. Task 5.2 requires to conditionally
trust DSCP markings from the Cisco IP phone, which can be accomplished with:
mls qos trust device cisco-phone
mls qos trust
-407
GSM: 621 303 616
E-mail: cfrider...@netcore.lu
*From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Miron Kobelski
*Sent:* mercredi 26 janvier 2011 19:07
*To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
*Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750
| CCIE_Voice] 3750 QoS: service-policy + mls qos trustcommands on
the same port
Hello,
I'm working on Vol2 Lab8 QoS section. Task 5.2 requires to conditionally trust
DSCP markings from the Cisco IP phone, which can be accomplished with:
mls qos trust device cisco-phone
mls qos trust dscp
If you set mls qos trust cos then CoS markings will be preserved; however,
any DSCP marking will be written to 0.
The same holds true for mls qos trust dscp. Any packet entering the switch
with a CoS marking will be written to 0.
That is why you have cos-to-dscp and dscp-to-cos mappings.
Afaik, it's not supported
--
Sent from my mobile device.
Am 09.07.2010 23:41 schrieb Mark Holloway m...@markholloway.com:
I'm attempting to police VoIP signaling on Fast1/0/1 of a 3750 switch that
is configured as a trunk port connecting to the HQ router. I can't apply
the service-policy in
I'm attempting to police VoIP signaling on Fast1/0/1 of a 3750 switch that is
configured as a trunk port connecting to the HQ router. I can't apply the
service-policy in the output direction. Am I thinking about this the wrong way
because I can apply it in the inbound direction.
# show run
to 8k of speed.
Peter
- Original Message -
From: Alex Hannah
To: Michael Ciarfello
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ; Farkas Péter
Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 8:11 AM
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 QoS Question
Michael,
My understanding was older CUCM
Hello everyone.
I am attempting to create the following QoS policy on a 3750 port with an
IP Phone plugged in behind it.
The policy will police signalling ( SCCP ) 32k down to 8k and remark to DSCP
8. I have read through most of the SRND guide for the 3750, the model I am
following is the:
: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Alex Hannah
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 2:41 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 QoS Question
Hello everyone.
I am attempting to create the following QoS policy
-
From: Michael Ciarfello mciarfe...@iplogic.com
Date: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 8:56 pm
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 QoS Question
To: Alex Hannah alex.han...@gmail.com, ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Here are some hints for you to research:
I
...@onlinestudylist.com
[ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Alex Hannah
[alex.han...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 6:56 PM
To: Farkas Péter
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 QoS Question
Michael and Farkas,
Okay, I have thought about
Of Jonathan Charles
[jonv...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 30, 2009 1:20 AM
To: James Key
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 QoS Question
When would you ever have two active streams to a phone?
I can't think of a set of circumstances that would have more than one
RTP
...@cia.net]
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 2:15 PM
To: James Key
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 QoS Question
James,
I started to respond to this yesterday and realized I was going down the wrong
path. I did run into this article which I have not had
yesterday?
-James
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of James Key
Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 2:09 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 QoS Question
Reading over the QoS SRND
Anyone have any guidance on the questions below I posted yesterday?
-James
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of James Key
Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 2:09 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice
-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *James Key
*Sent:* Wednesday, August 26, 2009 2:09 PM
*To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
*Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 QoS Question
Reading over the QoS SRND and trying to get a better
James,
In the example you're looking at is there a mls qos map policed-dscp X to X
line?
I believe that defines the mark-down to CS1 (or otherwise) when
policed-dscp-transmit is used in an exceed action.
Thanks. I just learned something new :)
-jeff
Reading over the QoS SRND and trying to get a better understanding of 3750 QoS
and more specifically, the Conditionally-Trusted IP Phone + PC with
Scavenger-Class QoS (Basic) Model. I understand the ACLs and marking traffic as
well as queuing, but am having some difficulty in understanding the
40 matches
Mail list logo
