You use them for +dial otherwise rp/rl will work
Randall
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 1, 2011, at 6:31 PM, adam compton com...@gmail.com wrote:
The list is probably tired of hearing from me tonight :)
So when should you choose Called party transformation mask over route
pattern/route list
I would say it all depends on the dial plan. Both can pretty much accomplish
the same; the problem at least for me is, how complex it gets when TEHO,
backup GWs and calling/called party presentation comes into play. In my
opinion CdPT patterns are scalable and they help you reduce your dial plan
The list is probably tired of hearing from me tonight :)
So when should you choose Called party transformation mask over route
pattern/route list manipulation.
I ran into a question with Device mobility that required called party
transformation, but I can't identify any other scenarios where i
Called party transformation mask are done for gateway.
I would use when there is plus (+) dial routpatterns.
if the question says that you can not manipulate called party number on
route list or route pattern.
-adil
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 11:31 AM, adam compton com...@gmail.com wrote:
The
