hi Guys,I am configuring cbarge on CME. 1) Could anyone tell me what are
Cbarge's advantages or a normal hardware conference bridge?2) Also how do I
test cbarge once configured?singhGet Yourself a cool, short @in.com Email ID
now!
___
For more
I agree with Ikizoo on the fact that it shouldn't matter what the PSTN is
handing off to your gateway. You have multiple ways to handle digit
manipulation on ingress:
1. MGCP, chop down to 4d at the gateway
2. Using a translation pattern that the gateway CSS can see
3. H323, use voice
Singh,
I am not sure how to answer question #1. cBarge requires a hardware conference
bridge so I don't know how one would compare/contrast the two. If you are
asking about cBarge vs. ad-hoc or MML conferencing then the main difference is
who initiates the conference. With cBarge a party with
Thats just a statement to test the VM from PSTN phone no worries no tricks
thanks
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 4:49 PM, William Bell b...@ucguerrilla.com wrote:
I agree with Ikizoo on the fact that it shouldn't matter what the PSTN is
handing off to your gateway. You have multiple ways to handle
I know that MGCP is a client/server protocol, and even that said I have a
very basic (?) question:
i. When I *have to *select the *isdn switch-type *to *primary-ni *(NI2) in
the IOS before configuring the controller, and
ii. if I can select the *dtmf relay method *to *out-of-band *for MGCP in
IOS
Not sure about item i. I always set the switch type in the GUI.
For dtmf relay, I always set in IOS because I believe the versions in the lab
fail to set the dtmf correctly. It also fails to set ccm-manager switchback
correctly. So, I do that in IOS as well. That said, I do set the appropriate
Well, sure. If you try to provision a pri-group manually and you haven't
defined a switchtype then the CLI will bark at you. I was making an assumption
that you were using ccm-manager config. My apologies. If you don't use
ccm-manager config then you will need to specify switchtype. If you do
It fail sometimes, what I do is set it manually after select it in the GUI.
Abel Mateo
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 9:40 AM, William Bell b...@ucguerrilla.com wrote:
Not sure about item i. I always set the switch type in the GUI.
For dtmf relay, I always set in IOS because I believe the versions
Well,
I don't use/haven't used ccm-manager config. I rather configure it
manually.
So, from this, at least what I will follow is to configure it manually in
IOS, and then change them in GUI appropriately to match configured values.
Thanks for the views, and other views are most welcome.
On
I have a shared line 4003on 2 of my site Cphones ( registered to CME) .I call
from the HQ phone to the shared line.I answer the call onSC phone 2 . The
shared line is active which softkey do I press from SC phone 1 to barge in?The
current tempate for the ephones is the
Ensure that the template is assigned to the ephone.
Also, make sure that you have privacy turned off on the ephone.
-Bill
--
William Bell
blog: http://ucguerrilla.com
twitter: @ucguerrilla
On Apr 9, 2013, at 8:44 AM, singh wrote:
I have a shared line 4003 on 2 of my site C phones (
Vik told us this in the troubleshooting class. If you are using CCM-manager
config, then it won't configure the following
- network clock participate and network clock select
- no switchback and no dtmf
- no bind control and no bind media
You have to enter them manually after the MGCP
thanks all for valuable inputs.it gets more clear now, after 2 attempts what i
learned lesson is have to verify whatever they asking, no assumption. :-)
lots of excellent engineer failed exam with tiny mistake or lack of time, i
believe that fail and pass are not much different here.
-ikizoo
trying to change the proxy domain name on the presence server for the past
hour now with no luck. pls guys any input on hw to go about it??
thanks
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
QoS Guru's,
In the real lab I know I have to do some calculations utilizing 95% of the
bandwidth...so if there is a link between SA and SB of 384k and SA and SC of
768k is the 95% from these numbers or what the actual interface can do?
Also what is a simple straight to the point read on this,
Here is my take, and take it at face value..
When I took my lab I asked the proctor am I to follow best practices and use
the 95% rule for my QOS.
Their response was it is not stated to use the 95% and it was my choice...
I did not follow the 95% rule and kept it as default
And I
From those numbers, those are the CIR values of the PVC, so you have to use
those values. They physical circuit would be a T1, which is academic as the
carrier can discard above the committed rate.
Hope that helps,
Mark
From: Barrera, Hugo
I used the 95% rule and I passed it too. So, read the requirements word by
word.
On Apr 9, 2013 5:43 PM, Leslie Meade leslie.me...@lvs1.com wrote:
Here is my take, and take it at face value..
** **
When I took my lab I asked the proctor am I to follow best practices and
use the 95%
So my first set of commands below this is NOT using 95% of the BW and the
second set of commands, in blue, are using 95% correct?
Does this look right?
map-class frame-relay AutoQoS-FR-Se0/1/0-201
frame-relay cir 384000
frame-relay bc 3840
frame-relay be 0
frame-relay mincir 384000
frame-relay
Hmmm I cannot remember but I am 95% sure :) that the fragmentation is not for
links over 768...
Hence the map-class for the link to Site C is incorrect... remove the
frame-relay fragment 960
From: Barrera, Hugo [mailto:hugo.barr...@nexusis.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 3:17 PM
To: Abel
I believe that a 768kbps link falls within the recommendation to leverage a
fragmentation mechanism. So, I believe that the map-classes are accurate.
Hugo, I know you said you don't want to review a SRND but I definitely
recommend you take the time to a look at the WAN Edge Link-Specific QoS
Hi All,
I know this is a silly question, but it's been bugging me.
Does the lab script care if your dial-peers have preference 0 (no
preference configured) or Preference 1 / 2 configured as it is below?
I realize that preference 0 (no preference) would be the dial-peer used if
there is a match
I will review thanks Bill.
Regards,
Hugo
On Apr 9, 2013, at 5:27 PM, William Bell
b...@ucguerrilla.commailto:b...@ucguerrilla.com wrote:
I believe that a 768kbps link falls within the recommendation to leverage a
fragmentation mechanism. So, I believe that the map-classes are accurate.
Hugo,
destination-pattern 9.[2-9]...
port 0/0/0:15
!
dial-peer voice 200 pots
preference 2
destination-pattern 9.[2-9]...
port 0/0/0:15
Thanks much.
Josh
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20130409/c53eaa82/attachment-0001
As I know no preference means he will take the top-down order with
ascending dial-peer order based on pot number. I believe if you stated
preference you can bypass the order of dial-peer
Thanks,
Ravi
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 6:13 AM, Josh Petro josh.pe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I know this
Hellow Experts,
how we can use ccm-manager commands to achieve mgcp configuration. How we
could carefully use in the lab.
Thanks,
Ravi.
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
Are you a
26 matches
Mail list logo
