[OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS
You have change threshold value in the below statement. mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 3 threshold 2 4 all other seeting are correct.So the final config look like below mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 1 threshold 3 5 mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 2 threshold 3 3 6 7 mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 3 threshold 3 2 mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 4 threshold 3 0 mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 3 threshold 2 4 HTH ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS
You have change threshold value in the below statement. mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 3 threshold 2 4 all other seeting are correct.So the final config look like below mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 1 threshold 3 5 mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 2 threshold 3 3 6 7 mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 3 threshold 3 2 mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 4 threshold 3 0 mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 3 threshold 2 4 HTH ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] WB1 LAB4A - Task 4.6 Gatekeeper
Dear All, With regards to the above task... I have followed the WB, checked the PG and watched the Walk-thro video.. Done everything as per required... But why is my SUB gk-trunk coming in as _3 when it should be _2 I have taken the gatekeeper and trunk out of CCM and recreated them. Put the config into HQ-RTR twice (plus reloads) DB replic is ok 2,2 on the RTMT Any help would be great..as am now lost !! Thanks Duncan HQ-RTR#sh gatek endpoints GATEKEEPER ENDPOINT REGISTRATION CallSignalAddr Port RASSignalAddr Port Zone Name TypeFlags --- - --- - - - 10.10.110.3 1820 10.10.110.3 51919 PLH323-GW H323-ID: BR2-RTR Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 10.10.210.101720 10.10.210.1033241 PLVOIP-GW H323-ID: gk-trunk_1 Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 10.10.210.111720 10.10.210.1133006 PLVOIP-GW H323-ID: gk-trunk_3 Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 Total number of active registrations = 3 HQ-RTR#sh gatek gw GATEWAY TYPE PREFIX TABLE = Prefix: 3* Zone PL master gateway list: 10.10.110.3:1820 BR2-RTR Prefix: 1#* Zone PL master gateway list: 10.10.210.11:1720 gk-trunk_3 10.10.210.10:1720 gk-trunk_1 Zone PL prefix 5... priority gateway list(s): Priority 9: 10.10.210.10:1720 gk-trunk_1 Priority 5: 10.10.210.11:1720 gk-trunk_3 Zone PL prefix 1... priority gateway list(s): Priority 9: 10.10.210.10:1720 gk-trunk_1 Priority 5: 10.10.210.11:1720 gk-trunk_3 gatekeeper zone local PL ccielab.com zone prefix PL 1... gw-priority 10 gk-trunk_2 zone prefix PL 1... gw-priority 9 gk-trunk_1 zone prefix PL 1... gw-priority 0 BR2-RTR zone prefix PL 5... gw-priority 10 gk-trunk_2 zone prefix PL 5... gw-priority 9 gk-trunk_1 zone prefix PL 5... gw-priority 0 BR2-RTR no shutdown ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WB1 LAB4A - Task 4.6 Gatekeeper
Hi Matt, Yes i'm using my own lab.. thinking about it..the SUB has been rebuilt, due to an issue with the DB.. So im thinking that the PUB thinks that this is subscriber 2.. when its actually subscriber 1 rebuilt.. hence giving it an identifier of _3 Would that make sense.. Thanks Duncan From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Matthew Berry Sent: 04 July 2010 15:38 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WB1 LAB4A - Task 4.6 Gatekeeper The _# is a unique identifier assigned to each CUCM in a cluster according to the order they were installed and added to the cluster. The Publisher will always be _1. The first Subscriber with be _2, second Subscriber _3, and so on. Are you using your own lab? My guess is that your current Subscriber is the 2nd one you joined to the Publisher. In the end, it is a cosmetic thing that you can ignore. In the lab, you can ensure that _1 and _2 will be there. HTH Matthew Berry Vitals: GVoice: +1.612.424.5044 Gmail: ciscovoiceg...@gmail.com Skype: ciscovoiceguru Twitter: ciscovoiceguru On 7/4/2010 7:52 AM, Duncan Hamilton-Walker wrote: Dear All, With regards to the above task... I have followed the WB, checked the PG and watched the Walk-thro video.. Done everything as per required... But why is my SUB gk-trunk coming in as _3 when it should be _2 I have taken the gatekeeper and trunk out of CCM and recreated them. Put the config into HQ-RTR twice (plus reloads) DB replic is ok 2,2 on the RTMT Any help would be great..as am now lost !! Thanks Duncan HQ-RTR#sh gatek endpoints GATEKEEPER ENDPOINT REGISTRATION CallSignalAddr Port RASSignalAddr Port Zone Name TypeFlags --- - --- - - - 10.10.110.3 1820 10.10.110.3 51919 PLH323-GW H323-ID: BR2-RTR Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 10.10.210.101720 10.10.210.1033241 PLVOIP-GW H323-ID: gk-trunk_1 Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 10.10.210.111720 10.10.210.1133006 PLVOIP-GW H323-ID: gk-trunk_3 Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 Total number of active registrations = 3 HQ-RTR#sh gatek gw GATEWAY TYPE PREFIX TABLE = Prefix: 3* Zone PL master gateway list: 10.10.110.3:1820 BR2-RTR Prefix: 1#* Zone PL master gateway list: 10.10.210.11:1720 gk-trunk_3 10.10.210.10:1720 gk-trunk_1 Zone PL prefix 5... priority gateway list(s): Priority 9: 10.10.210.10:1720 gk-trunk_1 Priority 5: 10.10.210.11:1720 gk-trunk_3 Zone PL prefix 1... priority gateway list(s): Priority 9: 10.10.210.10:1720 gk-trunk_1 Priority 5: 10.10.210.11:1720 gk-trunk_3 gatekeeper zone local PL ccielab.com zone prefix PL 1... gw-priority 10 gk-trunk_2 zone prefix PL 1... gw-priority 9 gk-trunk_1 zone prefix PL 1... gw-priority 0 BR2-RTR zone prefix PL 5... gw-priority 10 gk-trunk_2 zone prefix PL 5... gw-priority 9 gk-trunk_1 zone prefix PL 5... gw-priority 0 BR2-RTR no shutdown ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 9.0.830 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2973 - Release Date: 07/03/10 19:35:00 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WB1 LAB4A - Task 4.6 Gatekeeper
hi, I always thought that this number results from the order of CCMs in the CUCM group assigned to the trunk. But if you have only 2 CCMs in the group (have you checked this? maybe the previous subscriber installation was left there and is inactive somehow?), then this number is indeed taken from the order in which a server were added to the cluster. regards On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Duncan Hamilton-Walker dun...@rosethorn.plus.com wrote: Hi Matt, Yes i’m using my own lab.. thinking about it..the SUB has been rebuilt, due to an issue with the DB.. So im thinking that the PUB thinks that this is subscriber 2.. when its actually subscriber 1 rebuilt.. hence giving it an identifier of _3 Would that make sense.. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WB1 LAB4A - Task 4.6 Gatekeeper
Did you not delete the Subscriber from CUCM group and re-added it again before the rebuilt? Ash Duncan Hamilton-Walker wrote: Hi Matt, Yes im using my own lab.. thinking about it..the SUB has been rebuilt, due to an issue with the DB.. So im thinking that the PUB thinks that this is subscriber 2.. when its actually subscriber 1 rebuilt.. hence giving it an identifier of _3 Would that make sense.. Thanks Duncan From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Matthew Berry Sent: 04 July 2010 15:38 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WB1 LAB4A - Task 4.6 Gatekeeper The _# is a unique identifier assigned to each CUCM in a cluster according to the order they were installed and added to the cluster. The Publisher will always be _1. The first Subscriber with be _2, second Subscriber _3, and so on. Are you using your own lab? My guess is that your current Subscriber is the 2nd one you joined to the Publisher. In the end, it is a cosmetic thing that you can ignore. In the lab, you can ensure that _1 and _2 will be there. HTH Matthew Berry Vitals: GVoice: +1.612.424.5044 Gmail: ciscovoiceg...@gmail.com Skype: ciscovoiceguru Twitter: ciscovoiceguru On 7/4/2010 7:52 AM, Duncan Hamilton-Walker wrote: Dear All, With regards to the above task... I have followed the WB, checked the PG and watched the Walk-thro video.. Done everything as per required... But why is my SUB gk-trunk coming in as _3 when it should be _2 I have taken the gatekeeper and trunk out of CCM and recreated them. Put the config into HQ-RTR twice (plus reloads) DB replic is ok 2,2 on the RTMT Any help would be great..as am now lost !! Thanks Duncan HQ-RTR#sh gatek endpoints GATEKEEPER ENDPOINT REGISTRATION CallSignalAddr Port RASSignalAddr Port Zone Name Type Flags --- - --- - - - 10.10.110.3 1820 10.10.110.3 51919 PL H323-GW H323-ID: BR2-RTR Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 10.10.210.10 1720 10.10.210.10 33241 PL VOIP-GW H323-ID: gk-trunk_1 Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 10.10.210.11 1720 10.10.210.11 33006 PL VOIP-GW H323-ID: gk-trunk_3 Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 Total number of active registrations = 3 HQ-RTR#sh gatek gw GATEWAY TYPE PREFIX TABLE = Prefix: 3* Zone PL master gateway list: 10.10.110.3:1820 BR2-RTR Prefix: 1#* Zone PL master gateway list: 10.10.210.11:1720 gk-trunk_3 10.10.210.10:1720 gk-trunk_1 Zone PL prefix 5... priority gateway list(s): Priority 9: 10.10.210.10:1720 gk-trunk_1 Priority 5: 10.10.210.11:1720 gk-trunk_3 Zone PL prefix 1... priority gateway list(s): Priority 9: 10.10.210.10:1720 gk-trunk_1 Priority 5: 10.10.210.11:1720 gk-trunk_3 gatekeeper zone local PL ccielab.com zone prefix PL 1... gw-priority 10 gk-trunk_2 zone prefix PL 1... gw-priority 9 gk-trunk_1 zone prefix PL 1... gw-priority 0 BR2-RTR zone prefix PL 5... gw-priority 10 gk-trunk_2 zone prefix PL 5... gw-priority 9 gk-trunk_1 zone prefix PL 5... gw-priority 0 BR2-RTR no shutdown ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 9.0.830 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2973 - Release Date: 07/03/10 19:35:00 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WB1 LAB4A - Task 4.6 Gatekeeper
OK... Just noticed that this as well... Priority 5: - should this not be 10 as per the config on the HQ-RTR 10.10.210.11:1720 gk-trunk_3 zone prefix PL 1... gw-priority 10 gk-trunk_2 From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Matthew Berry Sent: 04 July 2010 15:38 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WB1 LAB4A - Task 4.6 Gatekeeper The _# is a unique identifier assigned to each CUCM in a cluster according to the order they were installed and added to the cluster. The Publisher will always be _1. The first Subscriber with be _2, second Subscriber _3, and so on. Are you using your own lab? My guess is that your current Subscriber is the 2nd one you joined to the Publisher. In the end, it is a cosmetic thing that you can ignore. In the lab, you can ensure that _1 and _2 will be there. HTH Matthew Berry Vitals: GVoice: +1.612.424.5044 Gmail: ciscovoiceg...@gmail.com Skype: ciscovoiceguru Twitter: ciscovoiceguru On 7/4/2010 7:52 AM, Duncan Hamilton-Walker wrote: Dear All, With regards to the above task... I have followed the WB, checked the PG and watched the Walk-thro video.. Done everything as per required... But why is my SUB gk-trunk coming in as _3 when it should be _2 I have taken the gatekeeper and trunk out of CCM and recreated them. Put the config into HQ-RTR twice (plus reloads) DB replic is ok 2,2 on the RTMT Any help would be great..as am now lost !! Thanks Duncan HQ-RTR#sh gatek endpoints GATEKEEPER ENDPOINT REGISTRATION CallSignalAddr Port RASSignalAddr Port Zone Name TypeFlags --- - --- - - - 10.10.110.3 1820 10.10.110.3 51919 PLH323-GW H323-ID: BR2-RTR Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 10.10.210.101720 10.10.210.1033241 PLVOIP-GW H323-ID: gk-trunk_1 Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 10.10.210.111720 10.10.210.1133006 PLVOIP-GW H323-ID: gk-trunk_3 Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 Total number of active registrations = 3 HQ-RTR#sh gatek gw GATEWAY TYPE PREFIX TABLE = Prefix: 3* Zone PL master gateway list: 10.10.110.3:1820 BR2-RTR Prefix: 1#* Zone PL master gateway list: 10.10.210.11:1720 gk-trunk_3 10.10.210.10:1720 gk-trunk_1 Zone PL prefix 5... priority gateway list(s): Priority 9: 10.10.210.10:1720 gk-trunk_1 Priority 5: 10.10.210.11:1720 gk-trunk_3 Zone PL prefix 1... priority gateway list(s): Priority 9: 10.10.210.10:1720 gk-trunk_1 Priority 5: 10.10.210.11:1720 gk-trunk_3 gatekeeper zone local PL ccielab.com zone prefix PL 1... gw-priority 10 gk-trunk_2 zone prefix PL 1... gw-priority 9 gk-trunk_1 zone prefix PL 1... gw-priority 0 BR2-RTR zone prefix PL 5... gw-priority 10 gk-trunk_2 zone prefix PL 5... gw-priority 9 gk-trunk_1 zone prefix PL 5... gw-priority 0 BR2-RTR no shutdown ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 9.0.830 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2973 - Release Date: 07/03/10 19:35:00 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS
hi Tom and Joe, with JF config like this : mls qos queue-set output 2 threshold 2 50 50 100 100 How can this be correct ? maybe I am wrong, pls suggest (they use threshold 3 , but above use threshold 2) mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 1 threshold 3 5 mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 2 threshold 3 3 6 7 mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 3 threshold 3 2 mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 4 threshold 3 0 I asked this question a week ago in forum. tks --- On Sun, 7/4/10, Tom tom.c...@gmail.com wrote: From: Tom tom.c...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Date: Sunday, July 4, 2010, 4:25 PM You have change threshold value in the below statement. mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 3 threshold 2 4 all other seeting are correct.So the final config look like below mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 1 threshold 3 5 mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 2 threshold 3 3 6 7 mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 3 threshold 3 2 mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 4 threshold 3 0 mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 3 threshold 2 4 HTH -Inline Attachment Follows- ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WB1 LAB4A - Task 4.6 Gatekeeper
I believe that the fact that it was rebuilt just explains it all. Not much to be concerned about here, I would suggest. On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 6:52 AM, Duncan Hamilton-Walker dun...@rosethorn.plus.com wrote: Dear All, With regards to the above task... I have followed the WB, checked the PG and watched the Walk-thro video.. Done everything as per required... But why is my SUB gk-trunk coming in as _3 when it should be _2 I have taken the gatekeeper and trunk out of CCM and recreated them. Put the config into HQ-RTR twice (plus reloads) DB replic is ok 2,2 on the RTMT Any help would be great..as am now lost !! Thanks Duncan HQ-RTR#sh gatek endpoints GATEKEEPER ENDPOINT REGISTRATION CallSignalAddr Port RASSignalAddr Port Zone Name Type Flags --- - --- - - - 10.10.110.3 1820 10.10.110.3 51919 PL H323-GW H323-ID: BR2-RTR Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 10.10.210.10 1720 10.10.210.10 33241 PL VOIP-GW H323-ID: gk-trunk_1 Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 10.10.210.11 1720 10.10.210.11 33006 PL VOIP-GW H323-ID: gk-trunk_3 Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 Total number of active registrations = 3 HQ-RTR#sh gatek gw GATEWAY TYPE PREFIX TABLE = Prefix: 3* Zone PL master gateway list: 10.10.110.3:1820 BR2-RTR Prefix: 1#* Zone PL master gateway list: 10.10.210.11:1720 gk-trunk_3 10.10.210.10:1720 gk-trunk_1 Zone PL prefix 5... priority gateway list(s): Priority 9: 10.10.210.10:1720 gk-trunk_1 Priority 5: 10.10.210.11:1720 gk-trunk_3 Zone PL prefix 1... priority gateway list(s): Priority 9: 10.10.210.10:1720 gk-trunk_1 Priority 5: 10.10.210.11:1720 gk-trunk_3 gatekeeper zone local PL ccielab.com zone prefix PL 1... gw-priority 10 gk-trunk_2 zone prefix PL 1... gw-priority 9 gk-trunk_1 zone prefix PL 1... gw-priority 0 BR2-RTR zone prefix PL 5... gw-priority 10 gk-trunk_2 zone prefix PL 5... gw-priority 9 gk-trunk_1 zone prefix PL 5... gw-priority 0 BR2-RTR no shutdown ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com -- Randall da ill Saborio CCIE Voice Wannabe #10054675811 (Real number coming this July 2010) ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WB1 LAB4A - Task 4.6 Gatekeeper
One other thing, about your priority showing as 5 for gk_trunk_3, it is because the gw default priority is always 5 by default, unless you specify a different gw default priority for the prefix, or a specific priority for the gateway. Eg: zone prefix PL 1... gw-default-priority 6 On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Randall Saborio ill2...@gmail.com wrote: I believe that the fact that it was rebuilt just explains it all. Not much to be concerned about here, I would suggest. On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 6:52 AM, Duncan Hamilton-Walker dun...@rosethorn.plus.com wrote: Dear All, With regards to the above task... I have followed the WB, checked the PG and watched the Walk-thro video.. Done everything as per required... But why is my SUB gk-trunk coming in as _3 when it should be _2 I have taken the gatekeeper and trunk out of CCM and recreated them. Put the config into HQ-RTR twice (plus reloads) DB replic is ok 2,2 on the RTMT Any help would be great..as am now lost !! Thanks Duncan HQ-RTR#sh gatek endpoints GATEKEEPER ENDPOINT REGISTRATION CallSignalAddr Port RASSignalAddr Port Zone Name Type Flags --- - --- - - - 10.10.110.3 1820 10.10.110.3 51919 PL H323-GW H323-ID: BR2-RTR Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 10.10.210.10 1720 10.10.210.10 33241 PL VOIP-GW H323-ID: gk-trunk_1 Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 10.10.210.11 1720 10.10.210.11 33006 PL VOIP-GW H323-ID: gk-trunk_3 Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 Total number of active registrations = 3 HQ-RTR#sh gatek gw GATEWAY TYPE PREFIX TABLE = Prefix: 3* Zone PL master gateway list: 10.10.110.3:1820 BR2-RTR Prefix: 1#* Zone PL master gateway list: 10.10.210.11:1720 gk-trunk_3 10.10.210.10:1720 gk-trunk_1 Zone PL prefix 5... priority gateway list(s): Priority 9: 10.10.210.10:1720 gk-trunk_1 Priority 5: 10.10.210.11:1720 gk-trunk_3 Zone PL prefix 1... priority gateway list(s): Priority 9: 10.10.210.10:1720 gk-trunk_1 Priority 5: 10.10.210.11:1720 gk-trunk_3 gatekeeper zone local PL ccielab.com zone prefix PL 1... gw-priority 10 gk-trunk_2 zone prefix PL 1... gw-priority 9 gk-trunk_1 zone prefix PL 1... gw-priority 0 BR2-RTR zone prefix PL 5... gw-priority 10 gk-trunk_2 zone prefix PL 5... gw-priority 9 gk-trunk_1 zone prefix PL 5... gw-priority 0 BR2-RTR no shutdown ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com -- Randall da ill Saborio CCIE Voice Wannabe #10054675811 (Real number coming this July 2010) -- Randall da ill Saborio CCIE Voice Wannabe #10054675811 (Real number coming this July 2010) ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab 8 2.3 and 2.8
Bruce - Have you ran a debug gatekeeper main 10? Could you include this debug in this email thread? My guess is that you have a 1# technology prefix coming into CUCM with the 5002 (1#5002) and your H.225 trunk is set to ALL for significant digits. For such a case, you would need to set your incoming digits to 4 or add a translation pattern that would match 1#. with a DDI-PreDot. The fast busy would make sense if your 3002 number is a SIP phone since the CUCM Annunciator is not supported for SIP. If you are calling from SCCP phones at Site C, then you'd be dealing with another issue. Since your voice ccapi inout debugs return an unallocated number, this leads me to believe that your underlying infrastructure is setup correctly; your call routing, however, is not. Let me know what you find out. *Matthew Berry* *_Vitals:_* *GVoice: *+1.612.424.5044 *Gmail*: ciscovoiceg...@gmail.com *Skype*: ciscovoiceguru *Twitter*: ciscovoiceguru On 7/2/2010 6:17 PM, Bruce Clapp wrote: Hello, I am having trouble with calls coming into UCM when using SIP early offer. I have inbound fast start selected on my trunk. Outbound calls from HQ and BR1 to BR2 work fine. When I call 5002 from 3002, I get a fast busy. If I look at the voip ccapi inout debugs on HQ-RTR when I try calling 5002 from 3002, It seems to indicate the I am reaching an unallocated number. I checked the css on the trounk for inbound calls, and it has visibility of the phones and route patterns for the pstn. I have the MTP selected, and a transcoder available to the trunk. Thoughts? *Bruce Clapp* Senior Systems Engineer Right! Systems Inc. 2600 Willamette DR NE Lacey WA 98516 +1.360.528.4070 Single Reach Number +1.360.956.0336 Fax bcl...@rightsys.com BLOCKED::mailto:bcl...@rightsys.com E-MAIL PRIVILEGED INFORMATION This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient's and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. If you are the intended recipient, please be advised that the content of this message is subject to access, review and disclosure by the sender's Email System Administrator. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST
Sean - Did you figure this one out? *Matthew Berry* *_Vitals:_* *GVoice: *+1.612.424.5044 *Gmail*: ciscovoiceg...@gmail.com *Skype*: ciscovoiceguru *Twitter*: ciscovoiceguru On 7/2/2010 11:12 AM, sean hurricane wrote: Ashar, I have tried your configuration and it does not satisfy the requirementi will try Kobel's configuration later.. On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Ashar Siddiqui siddas...@gmail.com mailto:siddas...@gmail.com wrote: It will not. You are not configuring ephones, you are just configuring privacy thing. Ash *From:* kobel [mailto:findko...@gmail.com mailto:findko...@gmail.com] *Sent:* 02 July 2010 16:00 *To:* Ashar Siddiqui *Cc:* sean hurricane; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com mailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST hi, doesn't this break the 2nd requirement? I've never tried this, but I would configure ephone-template and assign it to srst via srst ephone template command of telephony-services. sccp group should indeed be configured with srst as the 3rd option. regards kobel On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Ashar Siddiqui siddas...@gmail.com mailto:siddas...@gmail.com wrote: Sean, Do srst auto-prov none and then just create ephones (as many as required) and put the following in there: Ephone 1 No privacy ! Ephone 2 No privacy ! You will need to do all the basic requirements for Cbarge like conference hardware, sdspfarm units etc and configuring dspfarm with telephony-service address on third priority if the requirement is that Cbarge is working during normal mode as well. Give it a go and let us know how it works. Ash ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX Script question
Phil - The script looks good to me, but I haven't verified it in a lab. I couldn't determine from your email if there was an actual problem with the script or not. When you loaded it and ran tests, did you observe any unexpected behavior? Thanks! *Matthew Berry* *_Vitals:_* *GVoice: *+1.612.424.5044 *Gmail*: ciscovoiceg...@gmail.com *Skype*: ciscovoiceguru *Twitter*: ciscovoiceguru On 7/2/2010 12:20 PM, Phillip Day wrote: Hi, I have created a fairly complex script for a customer, and the only part I can't test yet is the queueing. I have attached a screenshot of what happens when a call is queued. Can anyone see any reason why this wouldn't work. The script has been validated, and we are about to add some resources to the CSQs, I'm just wondering if I could have missed anything here? The idea is that roughly every 15 second the user gets a prompt to say a customised hold message, then they get another to say where they are in the queue, and then another to say the estimated wait time. If they are 10th or more in the queue, there is no prompt for the wait time but the other two should play. Anyone see any problems with this?? Thanks in advance Phill __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by a content checking tool for the presence of computer viruses. Nettitude Limited is a Company registered in England Registered Address Nettitude Limited, Fosse House, Fosse Way, Leamington Spa, Warwickshire, CV31 1XG Company Registration Number: 4705154 VAT Number: 812 4539 44 www.nettitude.com __ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
