[OSL | CCIE_Voice] HWIC-4ESW
Hello list I am looking for 2 HWIC-4ESW cards for my lab, does anyone have spares I can buy? Thanks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] ESW and 3560
Hello Does anyone have spare HWIC-4ESW and 3560 I can buy? Thanks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] HWIC-4ESW
Hi Hesham I was thinking of going that route as well. Do you know how different the configuration is when using a 3560/3750 instead of ESW. From what I read, the VLAN configuration will be slightly different, and I'll have to create a trunk as well between the branch router and branch switch. Thanks On Jul 25, 2013, at 1:20 PM, Hesham Abdelkereem heshamcentr...@gmail.com wrote: Sir, Just use 3550 24 Poe switch it cost $70 on ebay. That HWIC will cost u at least $200 or more. I know its better for practicing labs but its not cost effective. You can find it on ebay.com Thanks, Hesham On 25 July 2013 09:45, CCIE Voice Aspirant ccievoice2013.2...@gmail.com wrote: Hello list I am looking for 2 HWIC-4ESW cards for my lab, does anyone have spares I can buy? Thanks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] HWIC-4ESW
Sounds good, thanks Hesham! On Jul 25, 2013, at 1:29 PM, Hesham Abdelkereem heshamcentr...@gmail.com wrote: Just get that model is good enough and cheap 3550-PWR-24 On 25 July 2013 11:28, Hesham Abdelkereem heshamcentr...@gmail.com wrote: Yes sure just make DOT1Q on port 24 switchport mode trunk switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q in the Branch router like gig0/1 or whatever make a router on stick (Sub interfaces) Int gig0/0.302 encapsulation dot1q 302 ip address 142.102.65.254 255.255.255.0 no shut int gig0/0.402 encpasulation dot1q 402 ip address 142.202.65.254 255.255.255.0 no shut ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] HWIC-4ESW
ESW are around $200, while a POE switch is $50.. Figure that.. :) On Jul 26, 2013, at 10:20 AM, wilson.sam...@bt.com wrote: One could easily buy the HWIC-4ESW on the ebay, and its almost at the same price as a 3560-PoE, however with ESW you will have to use the power bricks for the phones or buy a POE - Daughter Card for the phones to get power, which will put them in a slightly expensive mode than a PoE Switch (sounds bit crazy, isn't it?) Regards -Original Message- From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of CCIE Voice Aspirant Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 12:45 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] HWIC-4ESW Hello list I am looking for 2 HWIC-4ESW cards for my lab, does anyone have spares I can buy? Thanks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Is the CCIE voice worth anymore?
+1, although large scale will be something like 20k+ phones. Many small and mid-size companies will move to cloud eventually, given the cost savings with infrastructure/IT. Office 365 is an example. On Aug 29, 2013, at 3:17 PM, Michael Davis michaeldavis1...@yahoo.com wrote: No matter what, there will ALWAYS been a need for large scale Enterprise voice systems. I am one of those people, and I am sure I am not alone, I will always want a physical phone. I am also one of these engineers who will always recommned a system that is directly under your own site's controll. Clouds are great, but they have their place. I don't think telecom will ever be a total cloud based solution. From: Bill Lake whl...@gmail.com To: Drake J jdrake...@gmail.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 8:12 AM Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Is the CCIE voice worth anymore? As a former big Telco employee, they want three things: Stability Scalability Profitability At this time these applications are not there. On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 6:45 AM, Bill Lake whl...@gmail.com wrote: As a former big Telco employee, they want three things: Stability Scalability On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Drake J jdrake...@gmail.com wrote: hi Laksh, Thanks for your inputs here.This was a good discussion. It is always good for us to all know about things that happen outside . Talking about Telco OTTs we can already see few of the Telcos have come out with Webrtc solutions for enterprise and service providers . Check this video out too depicting their solution... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nz-BQZMp3sk Most of these applications written on software are supposed to open source and left for the users to customize . No real networking staff expertise required just download the SDK/API and customize and no more complex network topologies in future. Also no licensing fee too . Hence a real killer of techology in the future most likely we will see a wide spread of this starting 2014 if all predictions are to be believed. Hope someone from any of the TELCOs on this alias can add a few comments as well. Thanks once again for your inputs everyone. On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:05 PM, Lakshmish NS lakshmish...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Drake, I totally understand your concern, I'd be worried too. Having said that, we should always update ourselves with the latest technology. However, in future I believe Asterisk might be able to give tough run to Cisco UC. Not sure though, I hear stories that it is unstable and featureless compared to CUCM. I hope if someone aware of Asterisk would help us out here. Regard, Laksh On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Drake J jdrake...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Guys, Thanks for your responses I see u guys have empathized on call routing and and UC hardware for backend deployments. However Telco OTTs are coming up with directly provide these services over the cloud . Here is a disruptive analysis : http://www.slideshare.net/deanb/disruptive-analysis-web-rtc-overview-april-2013 Anyways, this might be not be so serious afterall . Just thought of brainstorming . Thanks guys for your responses again. On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Lakshmish NS lakshmish...@gmail.com wrote: Didn't have time to go through the video, I believe WebRTC is nothing but a Protocol, similar to SIP, H.323. Moreover, this protocol would only appeal to the Web audience, just like Skype, or Google talk. You still need to use UC hardware and their design for enterprise deployments. I mean we don't use Google talk and Skype in companies right? SIP is open source, but still Cisco uses it. As FAQ's suggest WebRTC is an open framework for the web that enables Real Time Communications in the browser. If only UC was that easy that could be implemented through browser, we didn't have to work this hard for CCIE numbers. You might want to go through this... http://www.webrtc.org/faq You've clearly misinterpreted WebRTC here.. On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Drake J jdrake...@gmail.com wrote: hi All, Had a troubling question hence thought of putting it out .Looking at the UC and networking trends worldwide it appears that the future of UC and collaboration is web based. Webrtc is the protocol that the world will use and individuals and organizations just need to code their requirement based on the WEBRTC. Here is the presentation that Google recently made http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E8C8ouiXHHk Clearly many of the UC vendors are already losing out and will be losing out in year 2014. Most of the customers are already looking at reducing the cost involved in maintaining costly UC vendor networks and their networking staff . Therefore that brings
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Generate a report for number of calls into PRI
CDR/CAR should be able to provide breakdown by PRI since it's MGCP. On Sep 4, 2013, at 5:34 PM, Edgar Feliz ejzi...@gmail.com wrote: TELCO can provide a usage report for each PRI, who is the SP? Edgar On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Hesham Abdelkereem heshamcentr...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Experts, I have 12 PRI configured as MGCP gateways and would like to replace them by a CUBE. Now, I would like to make Statistics/Feasability study about the number of concurrent calls on each PRI for example today from 8am to 5PM. Is there is anyway I can do that? That will help me in the calculation to order the number of concurrent calls properly when I migrate into SIP. Thanks, Hesham ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Collaboration Lab 1
First of all, mind yr manners on the forum before you say anything outlandish on different races. Secondly using the website at the first place to get lab dumps shows yr character on how you approach CCIE. On Mar 17, 2014, at 10:20 AM, kit yee kity...@outlook.com wrote: Yes, ccielabdumps some indian cheater its just waste of time and fake i have asked my card company to reverse my funds. ccielabdumps is fake I request OSL to block his ip address and this name so that we will not see any such spam From: nexusg...@hotmail.com To: collabg...@gmail.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 09:49:32 -0400 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Collaboration Lab 1 Hi Collabguru, Yes ccielabdumps is fake website better don't use the fake stuff.. Below is the orginal link http://collaborationie.com/index.php?/forum/21-ccie-collaboration-lab/ Cheers Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 14:33:51 +0530 From: collabg...@gmail.com To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Collaboration Lab 1 Hey Mates, Today I got lab 1 and what I got in the lab was exactly the same topology from here.Also the questions given in this book were similar to what I had in my exam http://www.4shared.com/office/t-pZpEZEba/CCIELABDUMPS_Collaboration_Lab.html Thanx Collabguru ___ Free CCIE RS, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless Security Videos :: iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc ___ Free CCIE RS, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless Security Videos :: iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc ___ Free CCIE RS, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless Security Videos :: iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc ___ Free CCIE RS, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless Security Videos :: iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 911 calls by mistake
We had the same problem. Unfortunately it's a user training issue. We decided to take out the 911 pattern and put stickers on the phones which specified to dial 9911 for emergency. False 911 calls dramatically reduced after that. HTH On May 26, 2014, at 8:31 AM, Ben John benjoh...@hotmail.com wrote: Guys, Our users are dialing 911 by mistake and cops are responding to the calls i think the reason being we use 9 to dial out. For long distance it is 91 and international it is 9011 . i thought about using 8 instead of 9 to dial out but we have some DNs that start with 8. Some of the guys suggest to use secondary dial tone when we press 9. Below are the route patterns that start with 9. Any idea how to solve this ? 9.011! 9.011!# 9.1[2-9]XX[2-9]XX 9.[2-9]XX[2-9]XX 91.[2-9]XX[2-9]XX 9.911 911 91.800[2-9]XX Thanks, Ben ___ Free CCIE RS, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless Security Videos :: iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc ___ Free CCIE RS, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless Security Videos :: iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc
