For the version 3 lab, has anyone found distinct limitations that would
prevent me from effectively using a 3560 in my lab?
I have not been able to find any discernable difference in the port QoS
config that would cause any issues.
Let me know your thoughts.
Thanks,
Mike
Benny,
Take a look at the QoS pre-qualify statement. I believe that
copies the info the gee
Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.
On May 8, 2009, at 1:57 PM, Benny Chung bennych...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a situation where two locations on a MPLS network are using GRE
Tunnel to
Negative. Emailed support about 10 mon ago to ask. Also wondering if
adding 5c reset my print counter for that module. I had a misprint
first run thru.
Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.
On Jun 29, 2009, at 4:05 AM, GRAFL Philipp philipp.gr...@nextiraone.at
wrote:
Has anyone
the
additional 5C lab. Also a very annoying thing is that I cannot print
the PDFs double-sided.
Philipp
Von: Mike Thompson [mailto:mthompson...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 29. Juni 2009 13:42
An: GRAFL Philipp
Cc: CCIE Voice Maillist
Betreff: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPexpert's CCIE Voice (Blueprint
, at 8:13 AM, Mike Thompson mthompson...@gmail.com
wrote:
I also asked about the unnecessary dead trees. Don't expect any
change any time soon on that.
Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.
On Jun 29, 2009, at 7:56 AM, GRAFL Philipp philipp.gr...@nextiraone.at
wrote:
Same here, my
As a rule I go int RP report regularly and delete unassigned numbers.
Not sure of that works withTP, but would assume so
Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.
On Jun 29, 2009, at 8:29 AM, jeremy co jeremy.coo...@gmail.com wrote:
solved,
CCM didn't delete my previous configs
I don't think you can. Since TP are all urgent priority, AS SOON as it gets
a match, it will start routing. If you start your 'Direct to VM' pattern
with a # (or something other than [23]) the first won't match and therefore
will follow the second pattern.
From:
If memory serves, SJ is a little after 8 (8:15 or 8:30, but be early). RTP
is earlier, I think a 7:30 start (get there about 7am).
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Michael
Ciarfello
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 11:33 PM
No workaround, it is a Microsoft licensing issue. If you are using a
valid copy of cisco / Microsoft load, make sure it isn't the 2003 load
that had a bug that acted just the way you are talking about (valid s/
n but it wouldn't register with m'soft). It was a real early 2003
cisco build.
So CTPresident, to actually ANSWER your question (ß jokingly nudges Mr.
Ciarfello). Yes, the system is smart enough. I had tried to schedule a
date too far out previously and it wouldnt let me do so. It wasnt
specific in the message (i.e. it didnt tell me that I was scheduling too
far past
And that's one of the reasons you set the H-323 setup timer to 3 seconds.
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Michael
Ciarfello
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 3:48 PM
To: Nara Shikamaru
Cc: OSL Group; GRAFL Philipp
I basically did a tftp debug in cme to watch what files it needed to
load the phone. It's essentially the .sbn and .loads files (I uses
term61.default as my load reference). I did have to add tftp-server
statements for the jar*.sbn, the dsp*.sbn, the cvm*.sbn, the cnu*.sbn,
and the
Take ear plugs!!
Youll likely have fans from equipment in the racks 10 to 20 feet away (if
similar to San Jose). More importantly, if youre taking the lab with other
voice candidates, you dont want to have their ringing phones mess with your
mojo.
Some people will fart around ½ hr to 1
I don't know that it would matter. The originating ANI (the PSTN phone) is
what is showing on 1002 when it rings.so caller ID is preserved. It will
show a redirecting value of 3000, but I can't think of an issue (barring
specific translation rule manipulation) that would make that a show
Because it's VERY possible that the lab may tell you that you're not allowed
to use it. if it does, then you REALLY need to know the 'long way' to do
the MGCP configuration.
-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com]
My understanding was that beyond that everything built off the previous lab.
That may have just been for UCM though.
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Larry Hadrava
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 8:12 PM
To: Aamir Panjwani
In testing mobility questions, when I call from BR1 Phone 2 (as is
recommended by the proctor guide) the call does not forward out to my remote
destination. When I call from 5001 (or external numbers) it works fine. So
I started thinking.
- The numbering scheme for BR1 is obviously
To rule out a few of those things I called from BR1 phones and then from HQ
phones.
It only happened from the BR1 phones (it also worked fine from PSTN phones).
Doing more research, it actually looks like it's being caused by the calling
number transformation pattern from a previous step
You still get prompted for the password, or do you not start the upgrade
after the reboot?
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Bill Hatcher
Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 8:32 AM
To: c george; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Since Layer 2 can either be a 3750 or a ESW, you need at least 1 or 2 HQ
phones off of the 3750. To simulate the ESW, you can get a 3550 for the
basic fact that the port REQUIRES trunking in an ESW and on the 3550. I
didn't get into the QoS differences. If you can swing 2 or 3 drops off the
Make sure that you aren't running an AMD processor. UCM (and I assume
others) are assuming Intel since both the HP and Intel servers use them. I
built my machines on another machine and exported them to the AMD box, they
run fine, just won't install.
MT
From:
Anyone else seeing anything in their 'my hard drive' area? I assume it will
either be there or something they ship, but I don't see any update on the
blog either.
-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of
I believe that's all we'll get. The rest all feed off of the volume 5
config (building off each other).
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Michael
Ciarfello
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 12:52 PM
To: Bill Hatcher;
Anyone else think Mr Ciarfello is just bragging about his toys?? :)
-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Michael
Ciarfello
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 10:32 PM
To: Mark Holloway; OSL Group
Subject:
No failover UCCX server from what I understand. The failover of UCCX
means that it is integrated to pin and sub.
AD / DNS is testable, but won't be done for month (please correct if
anyone knows anything different).
Some features for CUPS are AD dependant, but many are not.
Sent from my
Jason...YOU my friend, need help :)
-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jason Granat
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 2:42 PM
To: Brian Valentine; Jonathan Charles
Cc:
For the amount of bandwidth we'd be pushing out of the servers, there's no
reason to have a dedicated NIC.
Two important notes on this:
1) If all of your servers are on the same physical VMWare host. All
inter-server traffic occurs via RAM within the host.nothing hits the NIC.
2)
You have a separate TEHO translation pattern for your globalization,
correct? You shouldn't need to modify your route patterns to account for
TEHO, it should be addressed via the XLation Pattern.
-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
And the douche bags strike again.
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of voice master
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 3:53 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Ver 3 passed
Hi,
Thanks to
Wayne.can you just tell us where this guy comes from and we'll go shut him
up ourselves?
From: voice master [mailto:voicemaster2...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 3:26 PM
To: j...@cia.net; groupst...@ipexpert.com
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; mthompson...@gmail.com
, take the f'ing hint and just go away.
Like dealing with a telemarketer, except we can't just leave the phone on
the desk and walk away.
From: Thomas Koch [mailto:koch1...@comcast.net]
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 9:24 PM
To: 'Mike Thompson'; 'voice master'; j...@cia.net; groupst
And to be more specific, you need to get 80 POINTS total.
The reason that's important is that the 'Open Ended Questions' are worth 21
of your TOTAL available points. If you don't get 3 out of 4, you only are
CAPABLE of getting 79 points (a failing grade). If you get the OEQ correct,
you get
To further on Craig's point. It is a 'strategy' for those very weak in an
area, say UCCX, to totally skip an area and hope that they ace other
sections to make up for it.
Definitely not something I would recommend since most of us will not ace
sections on this exam due to the complexity of
.
From: ABIOLA ADEFILA [mailto:adefilabi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 8:30 PM
To: Mike Thompson
Cc: OSL Group
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Internal calls between all phones should
dispaly 4 digit
Hello,
You mean i should uncheck the Use Device Pool Calling Party
in there, it has very valuable info.
From: Nara Shikamaru [mailto:shikam...@kagadis.com]
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 10:27 PM
To: Mike Thompson
Cc: OSL Group
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 2 Question 7.X
I think I was distracted when I originally sent out this thread, sorry about
, September 28, 2009 10:42 PM
To: Mike Thompson
Cc: OSL Group
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 2 Question 7.X
The MRG doesn't have a transcoder in it.
Maybe I'm overthinking this. Phones in each site speak G711 amonst
themselves but G729 when the stream is intersite
cranial - rectal
inversion.
From: Brian Valentine [mailto:bkvalent...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 10:50 PM
To: 'Mike Thompson'; 'Nara Shikamaru'
Cc: 'OSL Group'
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 2 Question 7.X
Can we even transcode a multicast moh feed?
From
Only place I know off hand is at the phone itself.
You can click on the link next to the line where you set the mobility mode.
It says 'view current device mobility settings'.
No less of a pain that calling out, but you can see all the info there.
From:
No, thats the key thing. But the problem is that CIR defaults to ½ of the
port speed (1/2 of 56k), so youre pulling a lot of traffic across a 28k
link.
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Garvas
Sent: Tuesday,
Pretty much the exact thing I did. Since I had a glut of VWIC-2MFT and no
VWIC2-2MFT floating around the lab, I just went the route of assuming a Euro
PRI would be T-1 format. As long as in your mind you keep track of the
difference in the lab (D channel being on 16 vs 23, linecoding / framing
Guys, don't forget that in the 'my configs' section on the IPExpert page,
there is a working config for each lab. Within those configs are the
configs to emulate the PSTN router that includes the PSTN and WAN Frame
Relay configuration.
Anyone taking this exam should be able to modify that
What's show sccp tell you at both routers?
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Aamir Panjwani
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 10:42 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just
So they're all registered.
Each of them is in their own MRG, etc.
Did you do a resync bandwidth after making any Location changes?
From: Aamir Panjwani [mailto:aamir.panjw...@ivision.com.au]
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 11:13 PM
To: Mike Thompson; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
fine.
If I recall, I was getting a similar message initially.
From: Michael Ciarfello [mailto:mciarfe...@iplogic.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 12:54 AM
To: Aamir Panjwani; Mike Thompson; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't
Peter,
I tell you what...not sure what time zone you're in (saying that
because your email came in at 1:30am), so I'm not judging.
You might want to close the book and get to sleep :)
Thank you for that by the way. Laughing my ass off to start the day is a
REAL good start :)
Both, but 79X1 phones will do it properly. Marks comment about the
7961 was about the IP Blue in 7961 phone, and not a testiment of the
7961 itself.
I'm short, you're fine. The globalized 'storage' of numbers won't
occur on cme anyway since there is no database to hold the number.
Sent
Has anyone found good BACD documentation in the Cisco Documentation pages
(the one's we'll have access to during the lab). I'm not going to remember
a lot of these details and I don't want to risk not having the Read Me to
refer to. Problem is that I get into the TCL script area (voice/Comm
Only copy I found so far is buried in the CUE area and it's a dead link for
BACD for CME3.3.
From: Mike Thompson [mailto:mthompson...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 10:05 PM
To: 'ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com'
Subject: BACD Documentation
Has anyone found good BACD
The Lab 4 reference is solely because they have you exit CUE to an external
number and then queue the call. BACD is the only mechanism (barring a UCCX
/ CME implementation) to implement call queueing in IOS / CME. I won't
play spoiler, but they have you do BACD pretty extensively if you read
Is the location set on the GW?
Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.
On Oct 7, 2009, at 6:46 AM, Aamir Panjwani aamir.panjw...@ivision.com.au
wrote:
ok finally spending hour on it and going through CCM traces I found
it was “out of bandwidth” issue because I had location set to
Actually that looks like before that point. Make sure that you have
dsp services dspfarm configured under the voice card.
Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.
On Oct 16, 2009, at 10:44 PM, Michael Ciarfello
mciarfe...@iplogic.com wrote:
Normal now in later IOS versions.
Sure, send me a money order for $1 and you pay the legal fees for
copyright infringement.
Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.
On Nov 21, 2009, at 5:31 PM, kerboute naoufal nkerbo...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Experts,
Can any one share with me IP Expert Voice LAB Vol2??
Kind
Due to a security setting in Adobe (a miss by IPX is my thought, because it
worked in the old version) that is preventing the printing in duplex.
Essentially the setting is ignored, so if you have a configuration interface
on your printer (not from the software driver in windows, OS X, etc),
Don't judge Jeff.there's still useful information in those noob books J
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Garvas
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 8:02 PM
To: A A
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL |
They must be planning an overhaul of some sort, problem is isolated to RTP
and I had the same issue.
I guess it just validates that you're not crazy.or is it that we're BOTH
crazy.choice is yours.
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com]
specific
than Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest...
Today's Topics:
1. Printing Proctor Labs (Randall Crumm)
2. Re: CCIE Voice Written Exam Study Materials (Jeff Garvas)
3. Re: Printing Proctor Labs (Amp)
4. Re: Printing Proctor Labs (Mike Thompson)
5. Re: CCIE Voice Written Exam Study
...@verizon.net]
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 7:59 PM
To: Hough, Earl; Mark Nigh; Mike Thompson; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab Dates@ RTP
Not sure I guess cisco is looking to replace howard in rtp, i'm sure you'll
be good to go. He said there were exams scheduled
If call mgr group has subscriber first, config it on sub and try it
again
Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.
On Jan 6, 2010, at 9:48 PM, Robert McGhee bobwmcg...@verizon.net
wrote:
Anybody know why auto-registration wouldn’t work? It’s something
I struggled with recently
They are NOT flexible. If it let u schedule it, it's a system glitch
and it will prob bite u in te rear.
Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.
On Jan 14, 2010, at 3:21 PM, Erwan Erwan e_er...@yahoo.com wrote:
hi all,
Does anyone know if we have to sit for first lab within 18 months
Yeah, I assumed the same thing that if the workbooks would be ‘shipping’ next
week that download would be available now. I just sent a support email cause I
can’t RTFM either.
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of
All that is needed is:
Ephone-dn XX
Number XXX (optional no-reg if in GK land)
Park-slot
U doing any CoR that would restrict access to the park slots?
Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.
On Feb 9, 2010, at 9:35 AM, Robert McGhee bobwmcg...@verizon.net
wrote:
Hi All,
already. Third attempt: Aug/Sep.
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 2:14 AM, Mike Thompson
mthompson...@gmail.com wrote:
Everyone keeps talking about the ?free OEQ?, but they?re forgetting
a key thing. The OEQ is 30 minutes. There are 4 questions that
are, if you?re actually prepared
Damn good question!! My thought is that the call on hold will be
'termiated' at the call control and not to the phone.
So while a call is on hold, the bandwidth will be near 0 to the phone.
Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.
On Mar 18, 2010, at 6:17 AM, Berry, Matthew J.
that in mind. It's an important bit to know, as it makes the
test harder. I had my second attempt at the end of Jan, and this was
implemented already. Third attempt: Aug/Sep.
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 2:14 AM, Mike Thompson
mthompson...@gmail.com wrote:
Everyone keeps talking about the ‘free OEQ
This has been a topic of conversation at work between a few of us, so
I'm interested in the feedback.
Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.
On Mar 18, 2010, at 5:55 AM, Berry, Matthew J. mjbe...@krollontrack.com
wrote:
The QoS SRND states that the auto qos voip command adds the
Whenever I'm building those CSS, I always name my xform patterns and
partitions accordingly.
Can take a few extra minutes, but I am all but guaranteed to lose more than
that troubleshooting in a lab scenario
From: Mike Brooks [mailto:2xcci...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2010 11:56
:facepalm:
And he would have gotten away with it too if it weren't for those
pesky kids (chat history)
Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.
On Mar 25, 2010, at 2:14 PM, Drew LePla dle...@ipexpert.com wrote:
Kapil,
We in no way condone soliciting on this list. This is strictly a
The way we addressed those in the past is to have any 911 calls coming from
a class room ring a internal security group (hunt group) consisting of a
dozen or so numbers of internal staff (phones that are always manned in some
form or fashion during the day). Any calls that require actual
I would agree, first things is to verify that Tomcat is happy.
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Ryan Schwab
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 1:11 AM
To: 'vccie2010'; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL |
Syntax escapes me right now, but there will be a show service or list
service command that will show the status of all services on the server. It
should show status as well
From: Ryan Schwab [mailto:schwab...@shaw.ca]
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 1:15 AM
To: 'Mike Thompson'; 'vccie2010
Utils service list will show the list of services and their status
From: Ryan Schwab [mailto:schwab...@shaw.ca]
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 1:15 AM
To: 'Mike Thompson'; 'vccie2010'; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch
Under Cisco.com, log in, click ordering, then click dynamic configuration
tool (DCT as it's often referred).
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Rashid Khan
Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 4:06 AM
To: ccie voice
Subject: [OSL
If it's straight srst (not cme) us the alias command with sequence
ordering under call-manager-fallback section.
Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.
On Jun 30, 2010, at 12:48 PM, Ashar Siddiqui siddas...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
I came across an interesting situation today
Try integrating an MTP
Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.
On Aug 2, 2010, at 8:52 PM, CCIE Voice GMAIL givemeccievoice2...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi everyone,
Is there something special you need to configure with a Remote GK in order to
enable transfers or holds? I am fooling
Place a laptop in that vlan, get an IP? Then the prob isn't UCM? No, ten
troubleshoot scope.
If you do from laptop / PC, then plz send switch config.
Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.
On Sep 18, 2010, at 4:07 PM, ratan singh ratan...@rediffmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have 2
And be careful, due to the number of hotels I'm a small area, lots of car break
ins
Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.
On Sep 19, 2010, at 8:51 AM, Amp amccar...@cciequest.com wrote:
Hey Gang,
Can anyone tell me if the Extended Stay Deluxe - Polaris is in walking
distance to the
If it's not VMWare, it may be windows firewall if you're running on 2008
server. Icmp reply gets knocked down by default
Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.
On Oct 18, 2010, at 9:12 AM, Pithog Oil pithog...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On Mon, 10/18/10, Graham Hopkins
Eh, that's assuming the douchebag even had a number.
Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.
On Oct 28, 2010, at 11:32 AM, Ryan Schwab schwab...@shaw.ca wrote:
Lol - just too bad he didn't let his # slip out :)
-Original Message-
From: Wayne Lawson
Under the route pattern, in the section where you choose Calling party
manipulations (first section), if you set calling party name to restricted, it
does the same thing.
Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.
On Dec 4, 2010, at 10:57 AM, Tamer Ismail tih...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
He's got a funny dialect is all...must be from the east side...
Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.
On Dec 23, 2010, at 10:10 AM, bkvalent...@gmail.com bkvalent...@gmail.com
wrote:
I knew this guy was lying... John Smith from UK with broken English.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless
He probably just likes to hear people talk down to him. Maybe that's why he
asked the question in a educational forum.
Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.
On Feb 21, 2011, at 5:09 AM, Roger Källberg roger.kallb...@cygate.se wrote:
Yes you can use the + in EPNM, if that's what you
And I dare say, if you know it properly, you can prob do both sides as quickly
(due to cut and paste) by hand as u can with auto qos once u tweak the A qos
config.
Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.
On Mar 10, 2011, at 11:18 PM, Vik Malhi vma...@ipexpert.com wrote:
The most
I don't necessarily like the idea of 5.5 hours, but one thing is good about
that. IDEALLY, you should target 5.5 to 6 hours to get most of your work done.
Giving you an hr to troubleshoot and an hr buffer (psychological effects, etc)
Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.
On Jun 25,
Approach is entirely subjective. Just HAVE A PLAN AND STICK TO IT. I can't
emphasize enough that you should have a process and stick to it...especially
the first time. I was so scattered my first time that I wasted at least an
hour trying to get my bearings. It is VERY easy to do.
Have a
One little side note, u can't run more than 1 physical CPU on the free license
of ESXi. It can have up to 8 cores if I remember right, but 1 socket
I am upgrading to a second box because I plan on messing with things like
vmotion in the future.
The new one is more than enough on it's own.
An important difference between 40/60 and newer phones are actually specific to
SIP. When dialing from a 40/60 in SIP, it uses en bloc dialing, meaning that it
sends the called party as one big set of numbers. 41/61 and later do KPML
which acts more like SCCP in that each digit is sent as it's
86 matches
Mail list logo
