Great to see another person pass.
All the best.
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ricardo Arevalo
Sent: 05 December 2008 12:49
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Finally i got it! CCIE # 22885
After almost one year of
Cause code looks like unallocated number. Can't be 100% with referring to a
spec. But the Q931CauseIe IEData= 08 02 80 81 -- 81 is same as 01 =
unallocated.
Do you have an xlate on ccm to strip the 5# and resubmit for lookup on
internal extensions?
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
4 digits is certainly a fair way of doing this but if you were ever to need
TEHO it will not work.
This scenario normally works no problems.
_
From: jeremy co [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 December 2008 17:05
To: Stephen Collinson
Cc: CCIE Voice Maillist; rob bourne
Would be good to see those registry keys.
I could not find anything on Cisco which indicates there are registry keys
which can be amended.
I also went through the registry searching on a few things and did not get a
result.
I believe if you take the registry keys which TSP 8.2 adds and
Anyone got any ideas on how to change unity DSCP markings either on the
UNITY box or on the switch without using an ACL.
I was wondering if setting the unity port to trut-ipprec and then use the
ipprec-to-dscp map.
Do not know of anything for making the change on unity. TSP version is too
low
Phil,
Are you just starting out on this mission for voice IE?
Unless you are really close to the exam level I would wait about 8 months
and then start.
The exam is going to change for sure mid next year, announcement due Dec /
Jan / Feb time.
On average it takes 3-5 times to pass
pursuit of CCIE Voice, good luck.
Steve
_
From: Phillip Day [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 November 2008 20:30
To: Stephen Collinson; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VMware images
Steve,
Thanks for your insight - interesting view
Hello all,
Firstly apologies for off topic, to those whom are not interested.
I have a date end Feb 09 and am looking for something after 10 December 08.
I will take a slot anywhere, my slot is Brussels.
As an added incentive if I pass this time and we swap I will throw in a good
amount of
Both dial peers are POTS. The prefix is required in both cases.
The '$' is a more specific match than the 'no $'
Also
There is no interdigit timeout with an exact match on a DP.
A $ based DP can be useful if you need to have a more specific match for
some slightly odd application.
For
I did it before I posted. We must have something different going on.
Would you like an output of my debug isdn q931 and the accompanying config?
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 November 2008 17:07
To: Stephen Collinson; 'Mike Brooks'; ccie_voice
: Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 November 2008 17:07
To: Stephen Collinson; 'Mike Brooks'; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Dollar Sign or No Dollar Sign ?
- Original Message -
From: Stephen Collinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Both dial peers are POTS
Guys,
Not to labor a point but I have set this up this morning and do not get the
positive results you get.
I have 2821 with pvdm2-32 + nm-hdv with 2 * pvdm-12.
Upgraded IOS to something which support CME conference (12.4.22T)
Run a few tests and as I say don't get quite the same
PVDM 16 - Single DSP supporting 6 high complexity xcoder or 2 * 8 party
conference.
It is my understanding a single 5510 DSP can not support both conference and
trancoder. Check the following reference
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_3/vvf_c/interop/intcnf2.html#wp100328
7
I
Kevin, Are you sure about the xcoder with this type of secondary DSP? It is
the old style of DSP on the NM-HDV, I believe.
The 2 conferences will take the 5510. If it is a T1 and all Bchans are
allocated both the additional PVDM 12 will be used in the NM-HDV.
I find with the older DSP it
Thanks Ricardo,
Have you tested this scenario?
I did this type of test get different results from you. This scenario does
not seem to be controlled by this particular parameter.
Changing value form TRUE to FALSE and back did not impact the CCM trying GW
after GK fails.
I shut the
You could try using the 'forward no answer internal' on the line of each
phone.
Just tested the following and it seems to do what you want:
- add _pt-SRST
- add css-srst - put above pt in it.
- add route pattern () for external number to site b to _pt-SRST
- on each phone of the SRST site got
An interesting one.
Steve
_
From: Juan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 28 August 2008 07:03
To: Stephen Collinson; OSL CCIE Voice Lab Exam
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] call forward to CUE from a UCM phone
givesdead-air...
Hi Stephen,
just checked it: code 124-3j indeed
Try changing your source interface for SCCP to the loopback or another fe.
I came across a bug of this nature a few weeks ago, it was related to the
source interface.
Steve
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Key
Sent: 25 August 2008 20:06
How are you calling it?
PSTN or VOIP g729 or g711u?
Going out on a limb here, to perhaps save a few emails.
If you are calling in remotely via the GK the incoming call is perhaps g729,
depending on what you set on your trunk. This voip call needs an inbound
g729 voip dp to match on.
I am looking to use alias or hopoff from Gatekeeper towards CME box.
Does anyone know how to fix the source port CME/IOS uses to register to
gatekeeper?
The one in bold underline below (if you accept that sort of email)
Thanks
Steve
CallSignalAddr Port RASSignalAddr Port
Cheers Vik, Much appreciated.
Steve
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vik Malhi
Sent: 22 August 2008 18:35
To: Stephen Collinson
Cc: OSL CCIE Voice Lab Exam
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Fixing IOS / CME Gatekeeper / RAS source
port
For hopoff
Following adds a calling line number to a call coming in over a SIP
trunk going to somewhere else.
Add pt-sip-phone and css-sip-phone
Set SIP trunk inbound css-sip-trunk
Add a translation rule to pt-sip-phone
- set calling line number to 12345
- set translation pattern to
Normal path
Phone 1 - ccm - wan - phone 2
AAR
Phone 1 - ccm -gw1 - PSTN - gw2 - phone 2
Scenario is AAR works fine with MGCP destination GW2.
However change GW2 to H323 and AAR does not function.
Get the rerouting etc, but no Q931 Setup at GW1.
CCM seems to require the
% and browser hangs.
If anyone is really bored and into this sort of thing I can send you packet
traces.
Sorry to bother you all with this very tedious stuff.
Steve
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephen
Collinson
Sent: 11 August 2008 23:04
To: 'Vik
, it is the ordering of the CCM
Group List which determines this behavior.
I am trying to understand what causes this behavior.
Regards
Steve
_
From: Jonathan Charles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12 August 2008 12:32
To: Stephen Collinson
Cc: OSL CCIE Voice Lab Exam
TFTP and CCM services are enabled (and running) on the
Subscriber
Steve
_
From: Jonathan Charles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12 August 2008 13:26
To: Stephen Collinson
Cc: OSL CCIE Voice Lab Exam
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Auto registration to subscriber - strange
problem
Hi I would appreciate any experience people have with solving the
following problem.
Auto registration in a clean environment to the subscriber.
DHCP address allocation works fine
TFTP request for SEPX fails, as expected
Request for xml default results in a short tftp transfer with
, along with on going keepalives.
SDL trace shows activity on SUB.
Building a new subscriber.
Thanks
Steve
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vik Malhi
Sent: 11 August 2008 22:46
To: 'Stephen Collinson'; 'OSL CCIE Voice Lab Exam'
Subject: Re
Hi,
It's been a while since I look at these NMs in detail.
Would appreciate if someone could remind me which switch this card is
based on.
Thanks
Steve
/routers/ps5854/prod_qas0900aecd80
28d16a.html
Steve
_
From: Jonathan Charles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 August 2008 17:08
To: Stephen Collinson
Cc: OSL CCIE Voice Lab Exam
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NM-16ESW Architecture
It isn't.
the NM-16ESW is basically just 16 PoE
Attached is a list which I copied from some book. Added a couple. I am sure
there are a few more, feel free to update and repost.
Steve.
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Turner
Sent: 10 August 2008 22:46
To:
Anyone getting mails from some account in the Netherlands prompting you
to go to a web page and enter account details for this list?
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 August 2008 20:33
To: Stephen Collinson
Cc: cisco voip; OSL CCIE Voice Lab Exam
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPIPGW Sip to Sip
Right, the question is, how do you configure it correctly?
What would cuz the audio to not cut thru and the call to drop... I
You say from 1008 to 3003.
- inbound dial-peer on IPIPGW 501
- outbound dial-peer on IPIPGW 501
- inbound on CME 2001 - desired?
What is your outbound protocol for dial-peer 501? Is it perhaps default
H323?
When you change CME to H323 you then get a match, as opposed to DP 0.
Chaps,
To refresh your memories without having to go and read question.
Agent meant to go into a ready state after ring no answer.
Configured, tested and watched vid.
How did you get it to happen on the phone agent. I can not see it in the
vid.
Thanks
Steve
Nice one, cheers.
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Charles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 02 August 2008 14:58
To: Stephen Collinson
Cc: Mark Snow; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; OSL CCIE Voice Lab Exam
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 3 Lab 2 Q 43 Ring no answer to ready
state
IPCC System
No Joy, I had that config but tried it again after restarting the lot.
Cheers
S
_
From: Ricardo Arevalo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 31 July 2008 15:03
To: Stephen Collinson
Cc: OSL CCIE Voice Lab Exam; Mark Snow; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPMA
July 2008 15:03
To: Stephen Collinson
Cc: OSL CCIE Voice Lab Exam; Mark Snow; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPMA config bug / problem
Is the Uses Shared Lines option unchecked?
Automatic Configuration, Mobile Manager and Uses Shared Lines options
must be unchecked
That gets my vote for best piece of advice this century.
Finally we no longer need to be scared of a poxy 6608 blade.
That is some great troubleshooting, you should be in TAC or playing chess.
Cheers
Steve
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
I have just tested this setup with very basic config and it works just fine.
CCM MTP in NONE, SIP Trunk, RG/RL/RP on CCM
1 SIP dial-peer on IOS GW for in and out voip, no vad, g711, rtp-nte
1 POTS dial-peer for in and out
Check out debug voip dial-peer and debug ccsip
HTH
Cheers Michael, Nice one.
Was just about to test this, saved me a couple hours work.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Burkett,
Michael
Sent: 24 June 2008 14:02
To: OSL CCIE Voice Lab Exam
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX play
Cheers Mark, great bit of info.
S
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Snow
Sent: 23 June 2008 15:05
To: OSL CCIE Voice Lab Exam
Cc: OSL CCIE Voice Lab Exam
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Voice lab changes
Thanks Jacob - yes announce
Try following, may be of some help.
from cmd
Netstat -abno
There are a few possible IMAP ports depending on version, etc. Check for TCP
143 or 993 (IMAP / SSL)
If you find an entry in the output of the above command you can go into
services and turn off the associated process, if
Hi, I don't seem to be able to spot the problem here, any help appreciated.
- Unity integration tested and working from UTIM.
- 4th port set only for out MWI
- CME can dial MWI on/off locally and it works
- Dial into VM works fine from CME phones
-
Would appreciate any insight into why I am getting the following warning
when doing BACD config on ISR.
The warning comes when one tries to enter the param expressions under
the service aa or service queue.
Warning: Parameter has not been registered under yy namespace.
Xxxx is
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de Stephen
Collinson
Enviado el: 17 June 2008 10:43
Para: OSL CCIE Voice Lab Exam
Asunto: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Quick B-ACD query
Would appreciate any insight into why I am getting the following warning
when doing BACD config on ISR.
The warning comes
Event log shows a collision. Checked UTIM and MWI is only box with check in
it for this port.
I am just in the process of flattening everything to start some new labs.
I suspect it is possibly something I have been fiddling with in Unity. Will
find out in a day or two with the clean setup.
Hi Bartosz,
Try the following as a starter, it can be enhanced for a more friendly
interaction, by adding a call handler. It will queue the call and
continually try the extension.
Create subscriber - SC x2003
Subscriber-greetings - set 'after greeting' to 'Attempt transfer for SC'
For a decent paper on the subject check out.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk543/tk757/technologies_tech_note09186a0080
103eae.shtml
Worth a quick read.
S
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ccievoice1
Sent: 12 June 2008
Hi,
Would appreciate if anyone could let me know if we get the following
guide in the exam.
Cisco CallManager Features and Services Guide
Cheers
S
G'Day,
Scenario - Microsoft Fax server, into and FXS port, via various
different modems. Goal faxing into unity.
Not the easiest set of items to troubleshoot.
Going through tcl on-ramp script it looks like it should function, but
should and working are oceans apart in this case.
Hi,
I am a big fan of the online labs however I prefer to run my own lab for
most things.
If you want details mail me off line and Ill be happy to help.
HTH
S
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marwa Ahmed
Sent: 28 May 2008
Hi,
Below is an example of the DSP config I employ, with a few annotations. HTH
S
voice-card 0
dspfarm- Make this cards DSP resources available to FARM pool.
dsp services dspfarm - Enable the DSP resources as a DSPFarm.
!
sccp local GigabitEthernet0/1.923 - Local SCCP bind
sccp ccm
Does anyone else get every email on this list twice?
I have contacted support and asked them to look at it.
Have also unsubscribed multiple times and resubscribed with different
email address.
Simple things.
Cheers
S
54 matches
Mail list logo
