I am annoyed at the fact that Refmac doesn't seem to have much respect
for the electron density map
Other people are much better qualified than me to point this out, but
maximum likelihood methods have the utmost respect for your _data_ (and
especially their standard deviations). What you
What are the buffer pHs (first and second run), what is the
isoelectric point of your protein, have you tried Q column?... You
have to give more experimental details to be more precisely helped.
Nevertheless, you can find helpful advices in GE healthcare life
science Handbooks:
Hello everyone,
I have two ligands in my structure that I need to keep at a specific
distance from each other. How can I specify this restraint in refmac ?
Thanks
riya doreen wrote:
I have two ligands in my structure that I need to keep at a specific
distance from each other. How can I specify this restraint in refmac ?
LINK
http://www.ysbl.york.ac.uk/~garib/refmac/docs/files/coordinates.html#pdb_link
Well, I am sure this is not meant to happen. It doesn't seem to happen
with my 6.1 version
First question: are you sure that the project directory really has gone?
Rather than it no longer showing in ccp4i. Check for the directory in a
terminal window.
If it has really gone, then you have
Hi, everyone,
Could there be an error in the ccp4-6.1.1 setup files
(ccp4-6.1.1/include/ccp4.setup) in the fink version? After the last
update, my CCP4_MASTER variable was defined as /sw/share/sw/share/xtal.
Obviously, that did not work.
Removing the extra /sw/share and updating fink
On Feb 7, 2009, at 8:16 PM, Engin Ozkan wrote:
Hi, everyone,
Could there be an error in the ccp4-6.1.1 setup files (ccp4-6.1.1/
include/ccp4.setup) in the fink version? After the last update, my
CCP4_MASTER variable was defined as /sw/share/sw/share/xtal.
Obviously, that did not work.
