[ccp4bb] weak anomalous phasing (magic triangle I3C)

2019-04-25 Thread ChenTiantian
Dear all, I'm working on a 18kD protein, the secondary structure prediction says most of the structure is beta sheets, trying to solve the structure with SAD. Heavy atom soaking gives several datasets with I, W, Au, range from 2.7~3.7A, however, the anomalous signal is pretty weak, I couldn't find

Re: [ccp4bb] “Bound ligand” versus “modified residue”

2019-04-25 Thread John Berrisford
Hi Ian Yes, I understand that this causes an issue. My suggestion is to take this off the CCP4BB list and initially discuss this amongst a smaller group as part of our protein modification remediation project. I will contact representatives of the major refinement programs (Refmac, Ph

Re: [ccp4bb] “Bound ligand” versus “modified residue”

2019-04-25 Thread Ian Tickle
Hi John As Pavel already mentioned, the problem with the ligand covalently bonded to a standard residue is that the bond is likely to change the geometry of the residue for atoms that are completely part of the residue, not just the atoms involved in the link. In that case one would still need to

Re: [ccp4bb] “Bound ligand” versus “modified residue”

2019-04-25 Thread John Berrisford
Hi The wwPDB procedure on this is listed in the “modified amino acids and nucleotides” section of https://www.wwpdb.org/documentation/procedure#toc_2 However, we are aware of the inconsistency in the PDB archive of how these modifications are represented and that there are lots of ligan