Dear Brian,
Thank you for your reply. I think I could have provided you with the
correct formula myself ;-) but it is indeed correct now. In any case, the
verbal description I gave in my message specified it already.
The definition in the mmCIF dictionary does look like the source of
Hopefully, someone will be able to share 293 Met- media. But if not, could you
not use DMEM media with FBS, then deplete with DMEM with no glutamine, no
methionine, no cysteine (thermos fisher 21013024) but supplemented with
glutamax and cystine?
The following paper describes it in the large
Dear ccp4 community,
I am in my last 3 months of my PhD, working at the Structural Biology Unit
at IBMB-CSIC in Barcelona. As my experimental phasing trials using various
heavy metals failed so far, we ordered two months ago Expi 293 (Met-)
expression medium for selenomethionine labeling (see the
It's a Wiki so anyone can edit it. I think you just have to create an
account here:
https://dictionary.iucr.org/index.php?title=Special:CreateAccount=Real-space+correlation+coefficient
Note that you must have an entry in the World Directory of
Crystallographers, otherwise your Username will be
Dear Gerhard,
By clicking on the "Actions" button, I discovered that the contribution comes
from Brian McMahon. Maybe you could contact him about this?
Best regards,
Herman
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: CCP4 bulletin board Im Auftrag von Gerard Bricogne
Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. März
Exiting postdoc positions for structural biologists to study new trug targets
for Alzheimers and other neurodegenerative disease. Part of a large
international consortium funded by the NIH, you will study the structure and
function of diverse proteins, working in close cooperation with
Dear all,
While we are all discussing how to "push the frontiers" of our field,
there seem to be some dark and dusty corners in the documentation of some
basic notions. For instance the formula for the real-space correlation
coefficient given at
Thanks! Sorry for bringing up something that was already discussed recently,
but yes, that does still seem to do the trick (and in the process, after
re-installing Xquartz, XDS is working as well).
Thanks again,
Oriana
---
Oriana S. Fisher
Assistant Professor of Chemistry
Lehigh
I'd say that it depends on your state of knowledge, and on their I and sigma.
- if you know the space group for sure before you do the measurement of the
systematic absences, their I and sigma don't matter to you (because they don't
influence your mental model of the experiment), so their
