This is reminder that the registration for the upcoming CCP4/APS school
will close in two days (1/31/2023). If you plan to attend, please submit
your application asap.
Thanks.
Charles, Andrey, Garib and Qingping
On 1/23/23 14:43, Qingping Xu wrote:
This is a reminder for students interested
A postdoctoral research position is available in the laboratory of Yunsun Nam
Ph.D., in the Department of Biochemistry at the University of Texas
Southwestern Medical Center, to study the mechanisms underlying RNA-protein
complexes important for gene regulation. Our laboratory works on exciting
My (limited) experience of the Diffraction Methods GRC suggests that the most
valuable part of these meetings is when people get together outside the talks -
so independent of the session chairs (apart from the people that they invite)
and of any instructions given to speakers.
Just my two
Whether cross-pollination happens depends on the session chairs, and the
remit they're given, and the instructions given to the speakers: if
early on everybody sets the tone, to inform as much as advertise, then
it could be a rip-roaringly interesting meeting.
At least, I've never
Hi all,
I'm a big believer in cross-pollination between disciplines. I think there
could be room for a multidisciplinary methods meeting (MMM) provided the right
topics are chosen. If these are things that concern NMR-ists, X-ray-ans and
cryo-EM-ers equally you might get the right mix of
Hi, everybody, hi, Nukri and Pavel !
I fully agree with Pavel that, if the speakers are not exceptional, if they are
(as usually) concentrated on their specific and narrow problems,
cross-discipline meetings make us lost quite fast, they are annoying and
useless. Richard Feynmann had the same
Hi All
One of the joys of this meeting to me is that it is *not* about the science
results and instead explicitly about how you get to those results. I worry that
any meeting focussed on complimentary methods would inevitably coalesce around
the common themes - science results - and become yet
