Re: [ccp4bb] **Possible spam**cryoprotetant for 35% Dioxane

2010-10-21 Thread Edward Snell
! -Original Message- From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:ccp...@jiscmail.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Eric Larson Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 12:14 PM To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] **Possible spam**cryoprotetant for 35% Dioxane Hi Jerry, A great reference for initial

Re: [ccp4bb] **Possible spam**cryoprotetant for 35% Dioxane

2010-10-21 Thread Jürgen Bosch
Telepathy: 42.2 GHz Heisenberg was probably here! -Original Message- From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:ccp...@jiscmail.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Eric Larson Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 12:14 PM To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] **Possible spam**cryoprotetant for 35

[ccp4bb] **Possible spam**cryoprotetant for 35% Dioxane

2010-10-20 Thread Jerry McCully
Dear All; We just got some crystals from 35% (v/v) Dioxane. We are going to collect some data soon. Does anyone have the experience with the cryoprotectant in this condition? Thanks a lot, Jerry McCully