t of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburg
> Box 462, 40530 Göteborg, Sweden
> Tel: +46-31-786-3959 / M: +46-70-912-3309 / Fax: +46-31-786-3910
> Web: http://katonalab.eu, Email: gergely.kat...@gu.se
>
> From: CCP4 bulletin board On Behalf Of Hughes,
> Jonathan
>
Behalf Of Hughes, Jonathan
Sent: 28 May, 2021 14:49
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] AW: [ccp4bb] AW: [ccp4bb] AW: [ccp4bb] (R)MS
hi ian,
yes, that aspect was in my mind, a bit, but i wanted to keep it simple. my
point wasn't really how the "uncertainty" parameter is derived
s become exaggerated – which is another word for
"misrepresented".
cheers
j
Von: Ian Tickle
Gesendet: Freitag, 28. Mai 2021 12:10
An: Hughes, Jonathan
Cc: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Betreff: Re: [ccp4bb] AW: [ccp4bb] AW: [ccp4bb] (R)MS
Hi Jonathan
On Thu, 27 May 2021 at 18:34, Hughes, Jo
Hi Jonathan
On Thu, 27 May 2021 at 18:34, Hughes, Jonathan <
jon.hug...@bot3.bio.uni-giessen.de> wrote:
"B = 8π2 where u is the r.m.s. displacement of a scattering center,
and <...> denotes time averaging"
Neither of those statements is necessarily correct: u is the
_instantaneous_ displacemen
hey gerald,
yes, and surely it would be better than a u³ -based parameter (if it's the
dimensionality arising from a symmetric covariance matrix that's the problem).
actually, the guy on the beach was a greek-australian ex-cell biologist who now
works for a bank helping it to rake in money from f
hi gerard,
yes, but that's like saying that the height of a human being is 1.8 m +/- 0.04
m². and if (thanks to robert!*)
"B = 8π2 where u is the r.m.s. displacement of a scattering center, and
<...> denotes time averaging"
it would seem to me that we would be able to interpret things MUCH mo
