Dear Bulletin Board,
After some headbanging (Refmac5 had helpfully created gap records for all
insertions and deletions present in the structure), I got refmac5 running with
the TWIN option. Refmac5 also found the k,h,-l domain and rejected the other
possible domains because they were too
I have found PDB_REDO is an efficient way of tweaking structure solutions.
Among other things, it sorts through various MATRIX and BFAC weights and
tests effectiveness of TLS if not used already. It usually improves typical
final structure solutions for our group by about 1% or so Rfree and
At your resolution that seems to me a reasonable gap between R and Rfree?
Eleanor
On 21 Jun 2013, at 12:28, herman.schreu...@sanofi.com wrote:
Dear Bulletin Board,
After some headbanging (Refmac5 had helpfully created gap records for all
insertions and deletions present in the structure),
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] AW: Twinning problem - almost solved.
At your resolution that seems to me a reasonable gap between R and Rfree?
Eleanor
On 21 Jun 2013, at 12:28, herman.schreu...@sanofi.com wrote:
Dear Bulletin Board,
After some headbanging (Refmac5 had
,
Herman
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] Im Auftrag von Robbie
Joosten
Gesendet: Freitag, 21. Juni 2013 16:21
An: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Betreff: Re: [ccp4bb] AW: Twinning problem - almost solved.
Hi Herman,
Tighter restraints typically
@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] Im Auftrag von Robbie Joosten
Gesendet: Freitag, 21. Juni 2013 16:21 An: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Betreff: Re: [ccp4bb] AW: Twinning problem - almost solved.
Hi Herman,
Tighter restraints typically close the gap between R and R-free.
This does not mean one should just tighten
-
Von: Tim Gruene [mailto:t...@shelx.uni-ac.gwdg.de]
Gesendet: Freitag, 21. Juni 2013 17:30
An: Schreuder, Herman RD/DE
Cc: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Betreff: Re: [ccp4bb] AW: [ccp4bb] AW: Twinning problem - almost solved.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Herman,
a large gap
