Dear Dave,
Thank you for the answer. There is only one way to first import phases in
projects — using hop-on mode or task. Hop-on task can be run in existing
projects but should be started from the top of the tree. There is a way to
replace already existing phases with Import & Replace task,
f Shawn R
<a7787de0adf6-dmarc-requ...@jiscmail.ac.uk>
Sent: 09 July 2023 05:02
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] BUSTER on CCP4 Cloud
External Sender: Use caution.
Dear All,
I would like to run Buster refinement using CCP4 Cloud. However, the task says
I am missing a s
Dear All,
I would like to run Buster refinement using CCP4 Cloud. However, the task says
I am missing a structure revision. This is despite having generated the
structure revision using the Asymmetric Unit Content task. I can see the output
of AU Content task is the structure revision, so I am
Dear Xavier,
I am very sorry that I didn't respond instantly to your query about
this strange observation at the beginning of the month. After that, it was
sitting rather invisibly in my mailbox, given that its subject line said
Re: [ccp4bb] Dehydration treatments :-) .
We are just
Dear All
Thank you all a lot for your answers, and sorry for the trouble that my
question has generated.
Gerard B. : Thanks a lot to you and your colleagues for releasing, in the
forthcoming time, an OSX version of BUSTER-TNT.
Best from LA
Jacques
2008/10/28 Pete Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Clemens Vonrhein schrieb:
...
A nice task would be to compare different integration/scaling packages
at various stages: for finding the sites e.g. in SHELXD and separately
(using known sites) for giving best phases e.g. in SHARP. there could
be differences.
Yes, maybe it is finally time to
Hi Folks,
The idea of comparing different data reduction packages is an
interesting one. It is not however without challenges as alluded to by
Kay. As far as I can see there are two main challenges - the first is
that different users when given the same tools will do different things
- in
Gerard,
Thank you very much for clearing that up. It's always good to hear that
there's one less things I need to worry about.
Pete
Gerard Bricogne wrote:
Dear Pete,
Thank you for your message. I can confirm that you need not worry about
this clause: it is meant to prohibit the
Dear Bill,,
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 07:18:05PM -0700, William G. Scott wrote:
I'm actually one of those whom has struggled unsuccessfully to install
Sharp. I can't even remember why, and I am certain it was entirely my
fault, but this did get me wondering...
I guess this is often a more
I would like to add my comments that Sharp autoSharp are great
programs that produce excellent phases, and that installation isn't
too hard (even though the whole setup does seem unnecessarily
complicated :-) )
I would also like to say that the Global Phasing people, in particular
Yikes!
Apologies if that was over the top. I guess the chisanbop comment did
not properly convey the hyperbole, and hence humor, I was trying to
achieve. Hopefully my comments can still be taken as the constructive
criticism they were intended to be.
James
On Oct 26, 2008, at 4:57 PM,
Dear Jacques-Philippe,
Sorry to have been distracted into responding to comments on your
question rather than answering your question itself.
We will shortly be announcing an academic release of a new version of
BUSTER-TNT, which contains several major improvements over the previous
, October 27, 2008 5:03 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] buster-tnt on OSX ?
Yikes!
Apologies if that was over the top. I guess the chisanbop comment did
not properly convey the hyperbole, and hence humor, I was trying to
achieve. Hopefully my comments can still be taken
@all,
we've been comparing various programs during our SGPP times (that was
about 2 years ago) Sharp, Shelx, bp3, mlphare, SnB (BnP). If I
remember it correctly at that time Sharp was the winner, although the
site finding was the major bottleneck/problem. What we ended doing was
finding
Hi everydoby,
I`d like to know if there is a version of BUSTER-TNT available on
MacOSX ?
Anyone knows ?
*
Dr. Jacques-Philippe Colletier
UCLA / DOE Institute for Genomics and Proteomics
90095 Los Angeles, CA, USA
The info at
http://www.globalphasing.com/buster/installation/index.html#requirements
will give you some hints about whether it will be successful on OS X.
As per the Global Phasing modus operandi, any instruction involving
installation of their software is muddled in riddle and ambiguity.
Having solved a few structures using AutoSHARP, I feel compelled to
comment on the CCP4BB that I really like the software, never had a
major problem installing or using it, feel extremely grateful to the
guys at Global Phasing for making this available to us all, and for
(in my case at
Dear Gerard et al:
I'm actually one of those whom has struggled unsuccessfully to install
Sharp. I can't even remember why, and I am certain it was entirely my
fault, but this did get me wondering...
mlphare and MIR/MAD phasing seems to me the weak point in the ccp4
distribution. (I've
I heartily agree with Ash and Gerald - Autosharp (which we routinely use for
experimental phasing) is free for academics and in my opinion is an outstanding
package. Further, we have always found the people at Global Phasing are always
extremely helpful with all sorts of phasing questions not
19 matches
Mail list logo
